Enter your username and password.
New York, 7:51 PM
Wed Nov 11
72 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
tips@jezebel.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
Email | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
Email | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
Email | Twitter
Sadie Stein
Email | Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
Email
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
Email | Twitter
Contributors:
Jenna Sauers
Email
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Lizzie Skurnick
Email
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
06/12/09
06/11/09
Middle class consumers are a huge part of the profit for luxury goods companies. Most people, even most wealthy people, cannot afford a $75k gown. But most (or at least many) people can afford a $20 lipstick, a $75 bottle of eau de parfum, or a few hundred dollars on a purse. 40% of sales at lots of the luxury stores are made "in the first room" where the small leather goods are. These are also the easiest to sell, because there is nothing to fit--you like it, you buy it. End of story. Middle class consumers want their goods splashed with logos; the truly wealthy don't want any at all.
My mom has a Coach purse from the 80's that, other than being a somewhat dated silouhette, is still highly wearable. A few years ago, she wanted to buy a new one, and we actually had a bit of trouble finding one that was (a) made of leather and (b) didn't have a gigantor logo on the flap. At the lower-rent mall near her house, they almost exclusively sell the canvas C logo ones. At the fancy schmancy mall downtown, they have nicer, logoless ones. And $1200 cashmere lap blankets. Drool.
06/11/09
06/11/09
Basically, you go into a Hermes store (preferably a smaller, more obscure one -- Tonello went all over Italy and France), drop a couple thou on scarves and belts and whatnot, then casually ask if they have any Birkins and what do you know, they inevitably do. He got hundreds of Birkins this way (he was an eBay reseller). Basically, if you are willing to pay the "entry fee," you can bypass the list, which is maintained not because the bags are indeed rare but because Hermes wants to retain its air of exclusivity.
I've always thought that the Birkin was a pretty boring-looking bag anyway. :p
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
i consider myself fairly frugal, though i still spend an inordinate amount of money at the liquor store and whole foods.
06/11/09
And another thing: last time I was in Ross, the lady behind me in the cashier line and I started to chat: She is a Frenchwoman, shares her time here in SF Bay area and in Paris. Ross is her store. She can shop in Paris, and chooses to shop at Ross. A friend of hers travels all the way from Paris to shop at Ross. That is all I needed to know!
06/11/09
I'm no shunner of bags; I have several leather Coach bags that I love, and whether it means outlets or eBay, I try to buy the best I can afford because I like things that last. But LV seems very overpriced to me. Then again, I'm relatively poor, and not generally that nosy about what other people do with their money, unless they're constantly bitching that they can't make rent.
06/11/09
06/11/09
That movie also made me want to wear couture every day. I cannot fathom the skill it takes to make even one of those gowns. Valentino said that at one point, they bought a single sewing machine for the one hundred women working in his atelier. No one ever used it. That would be worth paying for (if I had the money). What's not worth paying for is another LV bag. Whenever I see someone carrying one, I tend to just assume it's a knock-off anyway.
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
[www.monocle.com]
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
Juicy Couture is another one that comes to mind, though I have a bag of their I like that is nice with a teeny, inconspicuous logo.
06/11/09
I do really enjoy the deconstruction of "luxury" or perceived "luxury" pieces. The transition from high-end, but accessible to "luxury" item is an interesting one that goes to show just how important and manipulative marketing is.
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
At least that's my take on the high-end fashion industry.
06/11/09
For example, the homeless look: an insect infestation level of holes in t-shirts, ripped everything and so on. I see this on the street and I think "ehh... that looks like someone I would see on Fashion People" but once its on the runway it somehow earns the labels of edgy, avantgarde and a whole lot of other complimentary shit.
So yes, I agree it definitely it more of a status thing.
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09
06/11/09