I found a copy of Sex and the Single Girl in my mid-twenties,and I renjoyed it- for what its worth, she was offering women who had not taken, or been able to achieve, an orthodox path to wifey-town, a vision of another way to live; independently and kind of rebelliously. again, in context of the era it was kind of rad- read it!
Between the comments on this post & the ones on the Debra Dickerson post, I'm suffering from serious choosing my choice whiplash. Then again, that Emerson dude did say that consistency is the bonerkilling hobgoblin of little minds.
@greengrey: Did you just make an actual judgement or imply that there should be limits to what can be defined as feminism? Get out of here with your girl-on-girl crime.
You don't have to agree with HGB's various philosophies or lifestyle...but if one of the basic tenets of feminism is that women should define themselves and their sexuality by their own standards and without being denied the same rights, respect and access to power as a man (right?) then I agree she was a paragon of feminism.
A man, like Larry Flynt, like Howard Stern, can be as objectionable and outrageous as he wants to be in his personal life and his private life. He doesn't have to speak for and on behalf of all other men to be respected or successful. In fact, the more a man is willing to be a "maverick" the more he is respected (until Sarah Palin comes into the picture).
HGB was certainly a maverick, perhaps a bit of a megalomaniac. But whether you agree with her agenda or not, she paved the way for the rest of us to say "Eff you Patriarchy, this is my".
@nakedscience: But it was her choice...and it certainly wasn't the traditional missionary-style, sex-for-his-pleasure-when-he-wants-it-otherwise-only-to-make-babies standard. That she was straight or felt empowered in her ability to seduce men and get gifts/attention for it doesn't make her less of a feminist IMO.
I mean, if feminists aren't allowed to define their sexuality as it relates to men then what, we have to be lesbians (that doesn't feed into negative stereotypes or anything)? We're all doomed to masturbation? Why can't someone be a Gurley-girl and still be a feminist? Isn't is about freedom of choice and expression?
Why is it any better to let the Doyennes of Feminism tell me who I have to be than to let The Patriarchy tell me who I have to be?
@MizJenkins: excellent point, I often feel like being a sensual, sexual creature forfeits being a proper feminist, because I might actually have some conflicting idealogies, that makes me human, not a bad feminist.
@bebedamour: That is not what anyone's saying. Being a sensual, sexual creature, and exploring what you like and what pleases you, is awesome. THAT IS NOT WHAT HGB WAS ABOUT. She was about molding yourself to MEN'S ideal of what women should look like and act like in bed, and she slapped the "empowerment" label on it.
@Understater: I read an article years ago about modern Russia, and one of the profiles they did was of a young group of friends who would all hang out in the sauna, drinking, and then the guys would ejaculate on the girl's faces. The girls all talked about how marvelous it is for your skin. It was just so weird to me. Like, there was no sexy times involved, the guys just jerked off to provide their friends with semen to rub on their faces. On a science-y note, I trained as an aesthetician, and one of the things I remember is that egg white masks are fabulous for your face, something about the protein. I can see where semen might work similarly.
@Treeless: Yeah...I HATE the fucking "feminist-enough" argument. HATE IT. She was promoting freedom of sexuality for women in a time when it was taboo...how does that not further the feminist cause?
People need to take things in context. What might seem like something that is the norm now, in her time, she was being completely radical.
@HoooooooT: No she was not promoting freedom of sexuality. She was promoting exploiting one's sexuality to gain favor with the boys. She was not about saying "yes" on one's own terms; she was about performing the sexuality men wanted from women.
@HoooooooT: Here's the problem. Decades on, she still doesn't see anything wrong with things like the "scuttling" described above. I can buy that she was a product of her times, but that doesn't excuse the fact that her views haven't evolved.
@SarahMC: Yeah, I think the problem is that using sexuality to exploit men actually reinscribes sexual mores on someone else's terms. You can't embrace sex on your terms if all of the ways in which you can be sexy have to do with its impact on someone else.
If anything, her legacy is a whole mess of magazines that just try and carve those tendencies even deeper.
@SarahMC: Or, she was promoting exploiting one's sexuality to gain power from the men (if they can't call us girls, we can't call them boys)? Which was the only way to gain power back then? I'm just thinking out loud here...
If there's only one bridge across the river and it's 'male only,' I suppose you could swim across, but it might be easier to sneak underneath and crawl across the substructure.
@tomboygirl: Using her sexuality was FAR FROM the only way a woman could gain power in the past. Myra Bradwell started the "Chicago Legal News" in 1868 and was successful without using her sexuality. And that's just one example in publishing 100 years before HGB took over Cosmo. And taking the easy way across that metaphorical river is not going to gain my respect, not when "the easy way" extols thinness and sexually pleasing and manipulating men as top priorities.
@tomboygirl: But this was manifestly not the only way to gain power--the other way was to push for equal-rights legislation, to organize and protest and educate, the way everyone else did (does).
The problem is that exploiting your sexuality to gain power isn't really empowering, because the power is actually sourced in another person. Sexual exploitation just offers the illusion of power, while simultaneously supporting the system as it stands.
@SarahMC: Very well put. In her world, either you were a no-fun housefrau or a swinging single girl. How is that not perpetuating the damn madonna/whore dichotomy?
A product of her times? No, I don't buy that crap. How come she is hailed as a trailblazer? I'm thinking more like Mary Wollenstonecraft as a trailblazer. Product of her times my ass.
From Time: "Writing in the Wall Street Journal last week, Brown fondly recalled working at a Los Angeles radio station during the late 1940s and early '50s. Her male co-workers, wrote Brown, played a "dandy game called 'Scuttle' . . . they would select a secretary, chase her down the halls . . . catch her and take her panties off. Nothing wicked ever happened."
According to the author, everyone enjoyed the pursuit and "no scuttler was ever reported to the front office. Au contraire, the girls wore their prettiest panties to work . . . Alas, I was never scuttled." Brown professed shock that modern girls would disagree with her notions of what constitutes a playful professional pastime.
If she considers herself a feminist, I don't have the authority to determine who may and who may not use the label, but I do think we need to stop trying to affix it to people's words and actions just to make ourselves feel better for liking them or acknowledging whatever contributions they might have made to the world. That's not necessarily directed at anyone in particular, but a general statement about a thing that often happens when people look up to someone who's status as a feminist icon is debatable. It's kind of like people needing to add all these qualifiers to why they like something that's considered a guilty pleasure. Just be honest.
As for whether we should measure her by today's standards or as a product of the times, I wouldn't judge her actions as harshly as I might if she were someone of my generation. But using a different standard to determine whether she deserves to be considered an icon is unfair to women who have gone against the grain throughout history despite the risk of being ostracized or what have you.
@sarah.of.a.lesser.god (aka Mrs. BrutallyHonestHobbit): While highly inappropriate for work, I think I shall introduce scuttling to the games mr.toast and I play around the apartment - in addition to "throw the cat at someone who's not looking" and "hey look SILLY STRING IN YOUR FACE"
@robot ninja spy is back... for now. weather: you are on not...: In case it's not clear, I'm making a distinction between feminist and feminist icon. I'll concede that she's a feminist if she chooses to call herself one because I'm not in the habit of telling people how to define themselves, but I would withhold the icon label.
@tomboygirl: Fantasies, fine. I'm not about to say a fantasy or consensual bedroom behavior makes you unfeminist. But what about women who don't have these fantasies and have this happen to them? It's assault.
@robot ninja spy is back... for now. weather: you are on notice.: I would pay to see you kick the shit out of them! Yes, she definitely took risks and I'm not denying that. And she promoted some frank discussions on sexuality that were valuable. But the overall message that she has sent has been one that is more girl-on-girl than we might be here for daring to say she's not a feminist icon. Anyone who says "Husbands are a source of supply. I never feel guilt about the wife, if she can't keep him at home." when referring to sleeping with a married man just doesn't cut it in my book. Agree or disagree that's fine, but I just can't call her a feminist icon. A publishing icon? Sure.
@toastandlove: YES! YES! YES! i want to friend you all over again!
mr. birmingham and i are also big fans of "if i pop that zip on your back then you have to pop this one on my ass- then i fart in your face- GOT YOU" and "fucking with you while you're sleeping"
@tomboygirl: But exploiting one's sexuality to gain power from men is what women have been doing, to some degree, from the beginning of time. IMO feminism is about making the world so that we don't have to do that. So that women can succeed because they are good at they do. It isn't about doing what's easier. In that case, it's easier just to resign oneself to the status quo.
Again, I know she doesn't live for my approval and if she was content to take that route to success, that was her choice, but there's not much iconic about taking the easy way out.
@birminghamdrunk: Yes, but my point is not that "they didn't rape her, they just sexually assaulted her" is not a good thing. It's fucked up and evil, too.
@Cimorene: i thought we were all in agreement about that. and in my orginal comment i didn't imply that it wasn't fucked up and evil- i was simply commenting on one sentence from the excerpt. i do apologize if i wasn't clear.
I don't think she should be judged because of her choices (I agree that she was constrained by the times) but I also wouldn't call her a feminist icon. That she was smart enough to tap into a specific market and appeal to certain women doesn't mean she's a feminist either. Just sayin.
@greengrey: Yeah that made me do a double-take, too.
It's wrong to judge people because they have big noses or wear too-small pants. It's appropriate to judge people for their ideas and the things they say.
I hope our daughters look at us and say what old fuddy duddies, they were still attached to heterosexuality as the norm (or whatever the new big feminist thing is). Isn't it nice to have perfect hindsight? Fact is she was pretty progressive for her age. If we go around tossing out too many acts as not 'feminist' or not feminist enough we can really thin the ranks of 'perfect' feminists. I'd rather take the self selected feminists as they are (not that I can't ask them for change, but I will still call them feminists) and work towards a more equal future together.
Helen Gurley Brown is interesting for her cultural contributions and her entrepreneurship. Her magazine played a major role in why some magazines so readily talk about sex today.
But since the magazine she created and its ilk are something feminists fight against on a regular basis (see Cover Lies, etc. on this very site) enshrining her as a feminist icon makes me very uncomfortable.
@thatsrealbutter: that's to prevent the fatties. Myself, if I want hot buttered rum, it's going to have dark rum, lots of real butter, and more sugar products than you can shake a stick at - a stick I tell you!
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
A man, like Larry Flynt, like Howard Stern, can be as objectionable and outrageous as he wants to be in his personal life and his private life. He doesn't have to speak for and on behalf of all other men to be respected or successful. In fact, the more a man is willing to be a "maverick" the more he is respected (until Sarah Palin comes into the picture).
HGB was certainly a maverick, perhaps a bit of a megalomaniac. But whether you agree with her agenda or not, she paved the way for the rest of us to say "Eff you Patriarchy, this is my".
WIN.
04/10/09
04/10/09
But she didn't. She defined her sexuality by men. Period.
04/10/09
I mean, if feminists aren't allowed to define their sexuality as it relates to men then what, we have to be lesbians (that doesn't feed into negative stereotypes or anything)? We're all doomed to masturbation? Why can't someone be a Gurley-girl and still be a feminist? Isn't is about freedom of choice and expression?
Why is it any better to let the Doyennes of Feminism tell me who I have to be than to let The Patriarchy tell me who I have to be?
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
On a science-y note, I trained as an aesthetician, and one of the things I remember is that egg white masks are fabulous for your face, something about the protein. I can see where semen might work similarly.
04/10/09
There is too much emphasis on relentless, scary perfection in feminism. It's girl-on-girl crime.
04/10/09
04/10/09
People need to take things in context. What might seem like something that is the norm now, in her time, she was being completely radical.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
If anything, her legacy is a whole mess of magazines that just try and carve those tendencies even deeper.
04/10/09
If there's only one bridge across the river and it's 'male only,' I suppose you could swim across, but it might be easier to sneak underneath and crawl across the substructure.
04/10/09
04/10/09
The problem is that exploiting your sexuality to gain power isn't really empowering, because the power is actually sourced in another person. Sexual exploitation just offers the illusion of power, while simultaneously supporting the system as it stands.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
According to the author, everyone enjoyed the pursuit and "no scuttler was ever reported to the front office. Au contraire, the girls wore their prettiest panties to work . . . Alas, I was never scuttled." Brown professed shock that modern girls would disagree with her notions of what constitutes a playful professional pastime.
Feminist icon my ass.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
EPIC FAIL
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
If she considers herself a feminist, I don't have the authority to determine who may and who may not use the label, but I do think we need to stop trying to affix it to people's words and actions just to make ourselves feel better for liking them or acknowledging whatever contributions they might have made to the world. That's not necessarily directed at anyone in particular, but a general statement about a thing that often happens when people look up to someone who's status as a feminist icon is debatable. It's kind of like people needing to add all these qualifiers to why they like something that's considered a guilty pleasure. Just be honest.
As for whether we should measure her by today's standards or as a product of the times, I wouldn't judge her actions as harshly as I might if she were someone of my generation. But using a different standard to determine whether she deserves to be considered an icon is unfair to women who have gone against the grain throughout history despite the risk of being ostracized or what have you.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
@robot ninja spy is back... for now. weather: you are on notice.: I would pay to see you kick the shit out of them! Yes, she definitely took risks and I'm not denying that. And she promoted some frank discussions on sexuality that were valuable. But the overall message that she has sent has been one that is more girl-on-girl than we might be here for daring to say she's not a feminist icon. Anyone who says "Husbands are a source of supply. I never feel guilt about the wife, if she can't keep him at home." when referring to sleeping with a married man just doesn't cut it in my book. Agree or disagree that's fine, but I just can't call her a feminist icon. A publishing icon? Sure.
04/10/09
mr. birmingham and i are also big fans of "if i pop that zip on your back then you have to pop this one on my ass- then i fart in your face- GOT YOU" and "fucking with you while you're sleeping"
04/10/09
so what'd they do? pull her panties down, then everyone just walks back to their desks and resumes normal work atmosphere? wtf? not buying it.
04/10/09
@tomboygirl: But exploiting one's sexuality to gain power from men is what women have been doing, to some degree, from the beginning of time. IMO feminism is about making the world so that we don't have to do that. So that women can succeed because they are good at they do. It isn't about doing what's easier. In that case, it's easier just to resign oneself to the status quo.
Again, I know she doesn't live for my approval and if she was content to take that route to success, that was her choice, but there's not much iconic about taking the easy way out.
04/10/09
04/10/09
they would select a secretary, chase her down the halls . . . catch her and take her panties off. Nothing wicked ever happened."
"wicked" i believe, was used in the context of- anything worse, like rape,- that's what i was getting at.
04/11/09
04/11/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
Why? What should we judge people based on then? I don't think every single choice should be respected just because it's a "choice".
04/10/09
It's wrong to judge people because they have big noses or wear too-small pants.
It's appropriate to judge people for their ideas and the things they say.
04/10/09
Lady GaGa, I'm looking at you. And judging.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09
But since the magazine she created and its ilk are something feminists fight against on a regular basis (see Cover Lies, etc. on this very site) enshrining her as a feminist icon makes me very uncomfortable.
04/10/09
04/10/09
04/10/09