<![CDATA[Jezebel: consumerism]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: consumerism]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/consumerism http://jezebel.com/tag/consumerism <![CDATA[All Hail The Department Store]]> There are very few places on earth quite like an old school department store. They are retro wonders, throwbacks to a time when shopping was an all-day experience: an entire world captured under one roof.

Susan Hill of The Guardian writes about the golden age of department stores, noting that visiting one now carries "a sense of an age gone by and offer a third way between the misery of trudging the cold, wet high street and purgatorial shopping malls." And I, like Hill, share a similar nostalgia for the grand stores of old, for as much as I loathe shopping, there is something sort of magical about an old school department store experience.

Perhaps it is a part of my childhood: my mother worked nights at a department store when I was a kid and my parents didn't have a great deal of money. It was her way of making an income and still being able to be there for us before and after school. My father would take us to see her, (we'd meet her on her dinner break) and as a child I remember being amazed by the cases of jewelry and the smell of 8 million perfumes at once (which now makes me sick, btw), and the way one department suddenly turned into another, something my favorite author, Steven Millhauser, captures in his short story, "The Dream of the Consortium."

With Macy's laying off7,000 workers and Wal-Mart and Target now the source for everything under the sun, the days of the department store, already in its twilight, may soon be at an end. Will you miss them if they're gone? Or will you celebrate the end of an old model and embrace the stores that have come to take their place?

In Praise Of The Department Store[Guardian]
Macy's Cuts Dividend And 7,000 Jobs [NYTimes]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5148714&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toy Story]]> In a new book, Christopher Jamison, a prominent Catholic cleric in England, has become a vocal critic of Disney and what he sees as the company's encouragement of materialism in children. While Jamison says that the Disney movies often have a moral message of good triumphing over evil, the products that go along with the movies encourage children to think that material objects will give them happiness and a place in the Disney world. Jamison says: "Where once morality and meaning were available as part of our free cultural inheritance, now corporations sell them to us as products." [Telegraph]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100250&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yes We Can...Hook Up With Strangers On Election Night]]> Apparently change came fast for plenty of opportunistic patriots last week — an unprecedented moment of national and romantic triumph! Like the sailor spontaneously sweeping a nurse into his arms in a symbolic burst of triumph on V-J Day, science teacher Jared Joiner tells the Washington Post's Monica Hesse that he was compelled to victorious face-sucking with a stranger. "It's like everybody felt they were automatically connected to everyone else. It felt like you were supposed to make out with someone when Obama won."

Unbridled joy or opportunism? Probably a little of both. The Post mentions one shy-guy who mustered the courage to ask a stranger watching the election results, "Can I have a kiss? For Obama?" And shared optimism can hardly explain the rash of November 5th "Missed Connections" seeking to recapture the ephemeral magic of the night before the morning after.

But whereas romantic ops may have been fleeting, the merch gravy train's just pulling into the station. Street vendors are selling more Obama tees, mugs, dolls, cards and pop art than ever. Obama web sites are booming, as people all over the world scramble onboard. The Los Angeles Times cites the multitude of Obama-themed books publishers are rushing through, including "The Obama Menu: Dinners With Barack Obama" and "Deciding the Next Decider: The 2008 Presidential Race in Rhyme." As one editor tells the LAT, "It's the biggest thing for publishing since Harry Potter."

If likening the president-elect to a magical boy wizard seems both worrisome and significant, well, it makes sense: evoking middle-aged politicians doesn't normally get dorks laid. Whether this bonanza can keep up when the boring business of governing takes hold is an open question: economic policy doesn't make for great t-shirts or for much of an aphrodisiac. But people can take heart from one thing: Obama's already helping the economy, and, presumably, the population: how many baby Baracks will we be seeing come early July? (Well Newsweek's on that one!)

Remember Me? The One With the 'O' Button? [Washington Post]
Americans clamoring for all things Obama [Los Angeles Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5084381&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Confessions Of A Shopaholic]]> Researchers have developed a new scale for determining if someone is a serious shopaholic — a condition that can lead to family conflicts, financial problems, and depression. Previous methods of measuring compulsive shopping tended to focus on financial distress, something that compulsive shoppers with higher incomes may not experience. The newest scale shows that compulsive consumption is linked with materialism, positive feeling about buying things, and a tendency to hide or return purchases. Researchers who developed the new scale hope that it will show others that there is a need to reduce compulsive buying and materialism and educate people about the side-effects of overspending. Maybe they can have a word with the Bush Administration? [Science Daily]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050443&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Not-So-Gay Greetings]]> Those gay marriage/commitment ceremony cards from Hallmark that the made the American Family Association take to the internets in protest are stirring up some more trouble in Idaho. Jordan's Hallmark stores, an independently-owned chain of card and gift shops in the Treasure Valley area has announced that they will not be carrying any of the gay-friendly cards in their stores. Drawing customers in with hate, not quality products, is a sad thing. [CBS News]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041900&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sob $tory]]> When Y. Euny Hong married "Leopold" a month after meeting him, some were skeptical. "My friends thought it was impetuous of me to go along with this breakneck courtship — especially since the ink was barely dry on my divorce from my first husband — but I could not be dissuaded. This was my lifelong image of what love should be like, and I was eager to start afresh," she writes in Marie Claire. And, sure enough, all was not rosy: seems what Hong interpreted as romantic quirkiness and childlike spontaneity was bipolar disorder. After Leopold's 4th suicide attempt, the couple called it quits. "Now, I am wary of overly romantic gestures, which is sad. But prudent." Yeah, well, the story of people suffering from serious illness is tragic. But hey, at least you can look as romantically melancholy as the pensive model the mag uses to illustrate "one woman's trip to the dark side and back"... dressed in "Sweater, $168, Calvin Klein; top, $78, Armani Exchange; pants, $79, Kenneth Cole Reaction." Sad — but stylish! [Marie Claire]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039432&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Living Oprah]]> This past weekend, our own Jessica Grose explored (again!) the world of consumer brand dedication with Living Oprah blogger Robyn Okrant. Though Okrant seems aware of the absurdity of her experiment, she does eventually fall prey to the seductive world of O's special type of branding. Okrant's husband observes that she has started to compare herself to people on TV and has started to worry about being "shlumpy," the subject of an Oprah episode earlier this year. While Okrant may or may not be damaging her own self-confidence by following the Oprah gospel, it is an interesting exploration of what happens when we follow the advice of magazines and TV personalities. [NY Times]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038420&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tampax has announced that it will launch...]]> Tampax has announced that it will launch a group called the "MonthlyGiftClub" (as in a menstrual period is a "monthly gift") for the tween social networking community Stardoll. For those of you over the age of, oh, 13, Stardoll is basically just a really watered-down version of Second Life, where girls can create avatars and join clubs. Anyway, the MonthlyGiftClub will provide members with white clothing (taking a "visual cue" from tampon ads that signal that a brand's products are "safe and absorbent") and members can sign up to receive free samples of Tampax Pearl tampons. Sounds okay, but maybe a better "visual cue" would be to give non-members sweatshirts to wrap around their waists and eventually have one girl run to the locker room in tears after some idiot boys point out spots on her backside? [Brand Week]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036471&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mad Men Is Stimulating Consumerism In The Midst Of A Recession]]> Each week, Mad Men has been killing me softly with its wardrobe and set design. That era of early to mid-'60s is undeniably attractive, particularly all the Eames-style furnishings and wall art. But it's the waist-cinching, curve hugging dresses that really get me. They only further prove my point that tent dresses are rags from hell. Could you imagine how those frocks would evaporate any and all of the vampy, sexiness Joan Holloway is dripping with? Anyway, I've been well aware since first viewing this show that it makes me want a cigarette in the worst —but most delightful—way. (Which kinda defeats the purpose of the Welbutrin I've been taking.) However, this week's episode really drove home for me how much Mad Men makes me want to spend my money on a whole new wardrobe and decor. The fact that it's a show about advertising makes it so meta. After the jump, stills from the most coveted possessions on this week's episode.



Let's start with my new obsession: Betty's equestrian style. It makes me regret that I have nothing saved from my horseback riding days, because I've spent upwards of 3 hours (that's not an exaggeration) on equestrian clothing sites and realized that building this look will probably cost me about $800. Howevs, I'm totally getting one of her shirts. But I would kill for this bag:

And her winter coat goes so perfectly with all of it:

As do those gloves:

And speaking of gloves, I think it's about time that we bring back opera gloves and costume jewelry.

The accompanying dress was also awesome. Other than New Year's and maybe Halloween, I can't think of an occasion to wear those where I wouldn't look like a total tool, though. Oh, and dresses! Peggy's was adorbz:

And duh, Joan's ruled, too. Now I'm thinking about investing in some serious foundation garments this fall:

Now, on to set design. Obvs this shelf is choice:

I dug this blond wood headboard:

And the matching lamps on the nightstands:

Now I need multiple silk pillows with large buttons:

And for some reason I was really drawn to this stupid framed art of a metal dog:

I also wouldn't mind a globe in my house. I suck at geography, so it would actually serve a dual purpose. I imagine that Betty went all out to make Don's office cozy and official. And smoked the whole time. Christ, I wish I could look that glamorous while chain smoking. Instead, I'm in a muumuu and my hair and face are competing for the Greasiest Surface in Brooklyn award.

Lastly, Roger Sterling's office is all kinds of awesome. I want to have that wall art.

And I wouldn't mind having him, either.

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036070&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tastes Like Slobber]]> What happens when you cross an over-saturated bottled water market with a Japanese person whose loose understanding of English isn't going to stop them from slapping it on everything? You get Pet Sweat. Mm, sounds...disgusting? Well, we can only hope that this is the result of an English mix-up for water marketed for pets and not, you know, actual bottled sweat from puppies. On second thought, who would buy bottled water for pets anyways? Surely nothing this absurd would happen in America, right? Right? (Image via WOW.) [WOW]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034278&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hey You! What Did You Spend Your Stimulus Check On?]]> Well, it looks like those stimulus checks from the government are starting to trickle in, and everyone is going crazy about what to buy! Apparently the checks are working and May's retail sales were "better than expected" (it turns out when you give people money, they spend it!). However, the May deficit for the government hit record heights thanks to all those $300-$600 checks made out to John and Jane Taxpayer, but who's complaining? (Besides some economists, Democrats, and others who think promoting intense consumerism is the last thing American needs?) Everyone loves (sort of not really) free money! The real question is: How did you spend the cash?

A new website called "How I Spent My Stimulus" is devoted to people posting pictures and stories about how they spent the free government dough. A book, based on the entries received, is to come, naturally.

Michael, from Los Angeles, spent his check on a nice little vacation to a communist country (Vietnam). Apparently the spending of American dollars in communist countries was pretty popular this year.

There were also a lot of people who wisely spent their checks on bills, school tuition, tire alignment, and other things they were in need of. One woman gave her stimulus check to her granddaughter to help the poor kid start paying back all the debt the government has acquired by borrowing money from China (and using it for stimulus checks). Fun!

Of course, there were also plenty of dumb people who spent their stimulus checks on frivolous things like luxury goods and clothes (including me, sorry mom!). One guy bought a fucking sailboat. Another guy spent his check on a pair of $330 Prada sunglasses (from the Sunglass Hut, no less). Money well spent?

You decide.

Eric, an earnest guy in Seattle, decided to spend his check on "services" because he heard they would stimulate the economy better than just buying things. He went to go see Cirque de Soleil: Corteo with his family. Do you think he enjoyed it?

Hm.

What did you all spend your stimulus check on? Did you even get it? (Many on the Jezebel staff have not! Give these women their checks, government, there is wine to be bought!) Sadie spent hers on getting someone to clean her kitchen "really, really well." I was planning on saving mine but decided to "invest" (haha) it in some adult clothes (a Helmut Lang blazer on sale and some black pumps by Marc Jacobs). Now all I need an adult situation to wear them in!

[How I Spent My Stimulus]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016239&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[If Vogue Readers Stop Shopping, How Will We Ever Cure AIDS?]]> Vogue, in case you didn't catch this, doesn't really spend much time trying to distance itself from the whole consumerism ponzi scheme. Like for instance, November's issue, aside from featuring a $4200 wood bangle bracelet and a story about this Vogue-sponsored AIDS benefit thing called, awesomely, "Shop Till AIDS Drops," contains a huge gazillion-page spread on the finalists for the Vogue/CDFA Fashion Fund awards, a competition I know about because seems to be covered relentlessly in Woman's Wear Daily, which is owned by Conde Nast, the parent company of Vogue, in which Vogue and this industry organization that is probably also owned by Conde Nast, give away $200,000 to one of ten up-and-coming fashion designers that Vogue has spent the past twelve months promoting so mercilessly that they already have their own Target collections, and therefore don't really need $200,000, but you know, it's all about generating more coverage by holding a fancy party to give fashionistas an excuse to wear the designers' clothes and, one imagines, get photographed wearing them in an upcoming issue of Vogue. So imagine my confusion when!

Right there on page 198, a story called "Why Less Is More." Less is more what? You'll wonder. Less is more AIDS? Turns out, less stuff can be more, well, less annoying?

Her, briefly, is what she has been getting by on, give or take the Courreges shift circa 1968 and a stack or two of striped matelot sweaters and tees: 1. Six navy jackets, including Balenciaga and Charles Anastase and a couple of boyish vintage blazers. 2. Ten pairs of lean jeans, dark and plain, that can pass for pants when required. 3. Four bags, with not a hint of It: black Hermes Birkin, Balenciaga brown leather saddle bag, and two Chanel gilt-chain strap classics. 4. A pile of ballet flats of varying stripe and persuasian 5. Two pendants, and a ring that belonged to her mother.
Um. Okay, to be sure, I know it is boring the way I always, like, pretend like this magazine is for serious when no one reads it or something, but this story seemed like a huge headfuck. Because if this lady's closet is minimalism, I know a few people who have a lot more acquiring to do. Like: JENNIE!]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316437&view=rss&microfeed=true