• Jezebel
  • celebrity
  • sex
  • fashion
  • Profile logout login

#cindileive#onlystorescompanyhistoryhtml

Jezebel

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #snapjudgment,
  • #groupthink,
  • etc.

New York, 10:33 PM
Sun Dec 20
19 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter

Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan Morrissey
| Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter

Reporter:
Irin Carmon
| Twitter

Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter

Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers

Lizzie Skurnick

Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter


Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1770 Subscribers
Jezebel
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of sequined sequined
    11/17/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    This suggests to me that we could be using women who look fit and healthy at all sizes to model clothes (at least in magazines) and odds are good that no one would notice and be outraged. Because you can't even tell she's bigger than the other models! #glamourplussize
     Reply
    sequined was starred sequined was unstarred
    Image of kayleen.hartman kayleen.hartman
    11/14/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    We have reached a state where plus size literally means women whose clothing size is a positive number.

    Maths. Ur dooin it wrong.
     Reply
    Alys Brangwin can't stop the beat promoted this comment Hiroine Protagonist approved this comment kayleen.hartman was starred kayleen.hartman was unstarred
    Image of MargaretMoony MargaretMoony
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    God, this is more frustrating then "Where's Waldo?". #glamourplussize
     Reply
    MargaretMoony was starred MargaretMoony was unstarred
    Image of SanFranLefty SanFranLefty
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    I'm surprised that Glamour didn't say "We put Michelle Obama on the cover, and she's at least a Size 10! Hooray for us!"

    Hell, Michelle's gorgeously fabulous arms are probably bigger than the thighs of most of the average size 00 models! #glamourplussize
     Reply
    SanFranLefty was starred SanFranLefty was unstarred
    Image of thereisn0try thereisn0try
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    I actually think that all of the women shown in this spread look slightly more "average" than stickly; more importantly, they all look HAPPY and vivid and pleasant, rather than dead, which other posts have indicated seems to be the preferred state for women in fashion these days. The women in photo #1 are stunning. I've never really been a Glamour reader, but I have to say that these photos give me a slightly more positive impression of their magazine. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    rodmanstreet promoted this comment thereisn0try was starred thereisn0try was unstarred
    Image of Nic Fit Nic Fit
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    Yeah, and when is Jim Belushi going to be on the cover of Vogue Homme? #glamourplussize
     Reply
    Nic Fit was starred Nic Fit was unstarred
    Image of Rooo sez BISH PLZ Rooo sez BISH PLZ
    11/13/09

    @Nic Fit: Just for this, ILU very much. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    Rooo sez BISH PLZ was starred Rooo sez BISH PLZ was unstarred
    Image of lj1968 lj1968
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    A size 8 is plus size? Dear God. Wasn't a size 8 the STANDARD not that long ago? What kind of sick individual needs size 0 models for their clothes to look good? And why is this pitiful lack of talent praised rather than pointed out?

    DIAF industry #glamourplussize
     Reply
    snarkordie promoted this comment lj1968 was starred lj1968 was unstarred
    Image of snarkordie snarkordie
    11/13/09

    @lj1968: Seriously. I've been dieting for almost a year to get back to a size 8, only to learn that the fashion industry thinks of it as PLUS-SIZE?!?

    FYou, Glamour. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    snarkordie was starred snarkordie was unstarred
    Image of JessickerFletcher JessickerFletcher
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    Ha! Picture No. 2 proclaims, "Don't be tardy for the party!" I wonder if by plus-sized they mean plus-sized blonde weaves. If so, I approve. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    JessickerFletcher was starred JessickerFletcher was unstarred
    Image of sportz.star sportz.star
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    I hear the point. I've heard it 1000 times here. And I agree with it. The exceptionally gorgeous woman in the photographs does not look remotely "plus sized." But, the fact of the matter is that in her profession, she is. She's probably marginalized and has a hard time finding work, makes less money and can't do the same sort of jobs as her model peers because she's maybe a size 6 or 8 and not a 2. No, this isn't a giant leap forward where all of a sudden a lady mag is showing us the full spectrum of humanity - both in size and color - after one successful image of a woman with *gasp!* a very small belly. But, I'll give Glamour credit for beginning to try. They can't reset the business model overnight and no matter what, the available models are going to be gorgeous women. They're models. One way or another they won a genetic lottery because they are capable of making their living off of their looks. It's no different than athletes making a living off of a skill that otherwise has little social value (100 mph accurate fastballs is not a transferable skill). The criticism is valid, but I actually think Glamour deserves more praise. Baby steps maybe, but steps nonetheless. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    sportz.star was starred sportz.star was unstarred
    Image of special_boots special_boots
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    Plus size?

    ...you're reaching, Glamour. You're really reaching. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    special_boots was starred special_boots was unstarred
    Image of o-line o-line
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    I can't find the plus-sized model. But I did find Woof, Odlaw and Waldo. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    o-line was starred o-line was unstarred
    Image of dialing_footnoterphone dialing_footnoterphone
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    Okay, here's the deal. When I was 8 my nanny/2ndmom/whatever sat my chubby self down and flipped through a plus-sized catalogue with me. Unlike LB's catalogues, it was full of women of ample curve - at least sizes 12, 14, and 16 were prominent. She told me women are beautiful at all sizes, and as long as I'm healthy, I don't have to fit into small sizes. I felt empowered *then*, I felt beautiful *then*. I don't feel empowered or beautiful now, what with the models at LB modelling the smallest sizes they have and these plus sized girls frolicking around in sizes I'll never squeeze into. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    wtfox?! promoted this comment dialing_footnoterphone was starred dialing_footnoterphone was unstarred
    Image of SaraRueful SaraRueful
    11/13/09

    @dialing_footnoterphone: I used to be active on BBW forums, back when it was still alt.whatever.net. And a few women there had written letters of complaint to the Roaman's/Lane Bryant catalog people to complain about the thin models. I know I've bought "cute" things from there before that looked HORRIBLE on me because, oops, I'm not a size 8. Anyway, the women had gotten replies that basically said that their customers didn't want to see women "like that" in their catalogs. Who are these self-loathing big girls, and can I hit them, please?

    **I don't know if you mean Lane Bryant the store or the catalog, which are two separate companies entirely. Just thought I'd chime in. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    SaraRueful was starred SaraRueful was unstarred
    Image of dialing_footnoterphone dialing_footnoterphone
    11/14/09

    @SaraRueful: I mean the season preview that LB sends out. Same models they have plastered all over the walls of the stores.

    And yeah, I have gotten some adorable clothes there and then put them on and was like "OMG I'M A BLUE BOAT, HOW DID THIS HAPPEN!?" and realise, the model in the shot? Probably wearing LB's version of a sample size. Le sigh. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    dialing_footnoterphone was starred dialing_footnoterphone was unstarred
    Image of Dodgergirl Dodgergirl
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    I mean, I think it counts in that a diversification of sizes should ALSO include women like Amy Lemons. But if Glamour is serious about a commitment to diverse body types, it's not enough by itself. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    Dodgergirl was starred Dodgergirl was unstarred
    Image of sarasasa sarasasa
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    No, it doesn't count, sorry, try again later. Like one size makes that much of a difference. It might for the people actually making the clothes, but I can't visually tell the difference between a size 6 and a size 8, so to me, it makes none. I hate this fake plus sized revolution anyway, like shifting the superficial parameters by which women's value is measured to include an ever so slightly bigger amount of women into the realm of acceptability is going to make any difference for most of us.
     Reply
    Aesop's Foibles. YES. promoted this comment Edited by sarasasa at 11/13/09 4:38 PM sarasasa was starred sarasasa was unstarred
    Image of Aesop's Foibles. YES. Aesop's Foibles. YES.
    11/13/09

    @sarasasa: Bravo! #glamourplussize
     Reply
    Aesop's Foibles. YES. was starred Aesop's Foibles. YES. was unstarred
    Image of rednrowdy rednrowdy
    11/13/09

    In reply to Spot The Plus-Size Model In Glamour
    a plus size model should wear a plus size, which averages to be dress size 12-14 and up. when designers realize that plus size women want actual design and style, not a curtain or caftan with a bow sewed on it, perhaps this will change, but in the designers eye, a size 8 might as well be wearing a size 18, and that's the problem.

    there are designers that are trying to change things and make clothes, but really all anyone wants is to find something cool and flattering that's advertised in mainstream media in their size. that's all. it's not hard, but the industry makes it an epic saga. #glamourplussize
     Reply
    rednrowdy was starred rednrowdy was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Jezebel account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.