Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #christinabinkley more →
Doonan Jumps To Ed Hardy's Defense; Smell Like Kate Moss For Fall
Mainstream Media Addresses Plus-Size Fashion Issue


08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
1. They got style advice from one of my favorite designers
2. They can actually afford his clothing
Bastards.
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
Yeah, even if I believed that, I don't think people like Jon Gosselin are in on the joke. They think it's edgy. So DUH right back atcha!
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
I think not. I'm pretty sure he actually believes wearing a tiger makes him look super badass and tough.
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
06/18/09
I'm probably an 7/8 and I fit fine in mainstream lines! Does she mean high fashion?
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
A lot of women have trouble because your waist is a 10 but your butt is a 14, or whatever. That's assuming you can find clothes you like in your size, of course. And THEN the sizes don't mean anything anyone, being as they are subject to creative inflation.
Why can't women's clothing be sized like men's? With measurements instead of arbitrary numbers. And to further improve it, clothes could come in different sizes in various "zones," like, pants would have butt and thigh measurements as well as waist and length.
I have this fantasy of a store where I could get clothing customized to fit my short legs, small but long waist, etc etc. And since I can't afford a tailor,a fantasy it will remain.
06/18/09
06/18/09
I actually haven't really seen them, I just love the name.
06/18/09
06/18/09
Here's another issue I have:
It seems like there have ALWAYS been plus-sized zebra-striped, or sequined, or spangled, or absurdly embroidered, or OMG CABBAGE-SIZED FLORAL PRINT-printed tunics. Some days it seems like that's all you can get at damn Lane Bryant or whatever.
However, the longer, tunic-like length is "in" currently, as well as empire waists, and forgiving knit garments, and maxi dresses.
Now, I don't love it; I like a more structured, skimming look. But I wonder if the blousy, elongated, figure-concealing juniors/misses styles are simply translating themselves into the stuff that plus sizes have ALWAYS had to endure--I wonder if that's why there's a sudden focus on "OH IT IS SO EASY* TO GET TRENDY PLUS SIZES NOW LOL".
I mean, a tunic that's meant to be oversized can fit a lot of different shapes and sizes. A stretchy knit dress can hang loosely on a small model and be more fitted on a larger model. Both garments will technically "fit" a range of sizes--which means that designers and manufacturers can throw size tags at the garments, sure, but they don't have to carefully look at rises, inseams, hems, or positioning of arm holes. It's not like the really unforgiving microfiber/midriff/ultra low rise stuff from late last decade.
It would really irk me if there was such a big brouhaha about OMG THERE ARE PLUS SIZES NOW LOL!!11 if it was just a flash in the pan based on today's hideous, figure-swallowing styles. I'm not sure if I'm making my point very well. It just seems like a cop-out for a designer to say "OKAY WE MADE THIS MASSIVE PONCHO FOR EVERYONE, THAT'S TOTALLY PLUS SIZE RITE!??! LOL".
*for extremely variable values of "easy"
06/18/09
06/18/09
Blargh. People need to remove their heads from their asses. That's all I got.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09