My parents are Silicon Valley millionaires (not that much in cash, but certainly almost double that in home equity) who don't feel rich enough because they're surrounded by people with tens of millions.
Feminista is my book. (And you don't know how happy I was to see this because I STAY on Jezebel.) But "bitch lit" was a term Publisher's Weekly used in an early review and I encouraged my pub to jump on that because we needed a selling point for this book. A lot of pubs rejected it because they didn't know what to do with this kind of atypical chick lit character and I think my current publisher is still finding their footing with this.
I think "bitch" only means what you're projecting onto it. And I think the same goes for Sydney, the heroine of FEMINISTA. Some women have said they hate her, some say they heart her...and I love that. Any visceral reaction aroused by a fictional character that was once just a figment of my imagination feels like a win for me.
@Feminista09: Hey, congratulations! I'm an aspiring author myself, and I am very impressed that you've gotten published and are getting attention for your writing. You give us unpublished, unwashed masses hope! :)
@whynotshesaid: thank you! After reading the comments here, I was thinking about contacting Media Bistro to do a talk about this with other female writers. Would you be interested in that?
Bitch lit? Who would want to date a girl who read those kind of books? I think this will only be popular with the hyper-brainy, fussy pants from the high-end colleges. No one who wants to get a date will spend much time with these things.
the reason i can't stand chick-lit is the unapologetic celebration of bourgeois lifestyles.
this quote makes it sound like this sydney character might break the mold a bit, but if you read the plot summary on amazon all hopes and dreams for something different disappear. thirty-something single woman with a f-a-b-u-l-o-u-s magazine job in NYC needs to get married before her "eggs sour." im not going to waste my time/money reading this (its a recession, people!), but i would like to know how it ends. do her eggs sour, or does Mr. Big come through after all?
@bowleserised: YES! If you have a book with an "unlikable" heroine, dust that MS/proposal off this weekend and resubmit. That's what almost every publisher said about Sydney but the women who have read the book so far are connecting with it.
@Feminista09: Yep, it was a standard rejection, because marketing always feared that lady readers couldn't cope with a heroine like, er, Scarlett O'Hara.
Maybe that's true, but I can't be the only one who cringed the whole way through the "chick lit" trend, can I? It seemed out of date at the onset, the way we singled out a whole genre of books as fluffy enough for women and only women. How condescending. Even "young adult" books have a more respectable genre name than "chick lit." Every time I hear that phrase I feel like I'm getting felt up in an elevator by some dude with a bad mustache and half a clove cigarette dangling from his mouth.
@rixatrix: You and I are in complete agreement. I felt vaguely insulted every time I saw one of those (instantly identifiable) chick lit novels in a bookstore.
@rixatrix: Funny you mention YA--I actually turned to reading it (and writing it) in my early twenties when I got SO SICK of chick lit. YA's actually an amazing genre--the one good thing about the Twilight franchise is that it's sort of legitimized it to the mainstream world.
I am in support of Bitch Lit--what it represents, anyway, rather than the semantic unfairness of descriptions of more realistic and complex characters as bitches. Although . . . I've seen better, funnier wordplay in Jezebel comments than in that sample from Feminista. (By which I mean to say: get writing.)
Variety. I love my trashy romance novels but it is hell trying to find something fun or interesting to read. Right now the aisles are filled with vampire, vampire hunter, dragon princes, werewolves, more vampires, and more vampires. Almost 40 percent of the novels are pararomance. Then there is the same old same old; the taming of the shrew, the "librian" type, the ones where she has to be taught to be a woman by some man or the questionbly virginal heriones. Gah! I read Lori Foster/ L.L. Foster but even some of hers can go a little off.You know who I liked Susan Johnson. She did three books with real, witty, fun characters: HOt Pink, Hot Spot, and HOt Legs. I'd like more of those types. [www.susanjohnsonauthor.com] [www.susanjohnsonauthor.com] [www.susanjohnsonauthor.com]
I could see this being bearable. I find a mean as sin bitch who relies on herself (not some ass in a suit) to get her material trinkets much more interesting than some quicky gal who is at the end of her financial rope and finds some rich guy (imagine that!) who saves her.
Problem is, not many people find a mean as sin bitch to be a sympathetic character.
@greengrey: Only because mean as sin bitches are rarely written with flare. I consider myself a "bitch" as do others but damnit I am funny and a whole lot of fun. Rom lit needs to have more humor and humanity in the herione. A little life.
@LowClassInk: Maybe in the first couple seasons. Not so much Carrie or Charlotte. I could watch "Samantha and Miranda take Manhattan"! They were the cool ones.
Especially Miranda.
I want great feminist science fiction or fantasy writing. I'm so over paranormal slutfi - If I see one more story about a leather-clad independent investigator with a heart of gold that falls for some Alpha beast and uses her extraordinary unique powers to save the world from evil...I'm going to explode! And not with orgasmic pulsing either!
@thatsrealbutter: I am dying for that to come out in paperback so I can read it. (I don't do hardcover, they don't fit in my purse.) I read an excerpt in the New Yorker and adored it.
09/12/09
09/12/09
I think "bitch" only means what you're projecting onto it. And I think the same goes for Sydney, the heroine of FEMINISTA. Some women have said they hate her, some say they heart her...and I love that. Any visceral reaction aroused by a fictional character that was once just a figment of my imagination feels like a win for me.
[thefeministafiles.blogspot.com]
09/13/09
09/13/09
09/12/09
09/12/09
09/12/09
09/13/09
09/11/09
this quote makes it sound like this sydney character might break the mold a bit, but if you read the plot summary on amazon all hopes and dreams for something different disappear. thirty-something single woman with a f-a-b-u-l-o-u-s magazine job in NYC needs to get married before her "eggs sour." im not going to waste my time/money reading this (its a recession, people!), but i would like to know how it ends. do her eggs sour, or does Mr. Big come through after all?
09/11/09
09/11/09
[thefeministafiles.blogspot.com]
09/12/09
09/11/09
Maybe that's true, but I can't be the only one who cringed the whole way through the "chick lit" trend, can I? It seemed out of date at the onset, the way we singled out a whole genre of books as fluffy enough for women and only women. How condescending. Even "young adult" books have a more respectable genre name than "chick lit." Every time I hear that phrase I feel like I'm getting felt up in an elevator by some dude with a bad mustache and half a clove cigarette dangling from his mouth.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
My favorite "chick lit" is Jennifer Weiner.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/12/09
09/11/09
[www.susanjohnsonauthor.com]
[www.susanjohnsonauthor.com]
[www.susanjohnsonauthor.com]
09/11/09
Problem is, not many people find a mean as sin bitch to be a sympathetic character.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Especially Miranda.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/12/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/12/09