I'm going to go to the can and dry heave for a while.

 Reply

I'm glad that there are places like Jezebel where we can discuss our bodies and sex in honest detail. This book, however, sounds like it's a bull's-eye for one of my pet peeves. When will "artists" of various types finally figure out that there is nothing new or edgy about shit, piss, sex, or innards?

[research.uvu.edu]

"I haue etun a dyschfull of curdys, / Ande I haue schetun yowr mowth full of turdys."

" Yt ys wretyn wyth a colle, yt ys wretyn wyth a colle,/ He þat schytyth wyth hys hoyll, he þat schytyth wyth hys hoyll,/ But he wyppe hys ars clen, but he wyppe hys ars clen,/ On hys breche yt xall be sen, on hys breche yt xall be sen"

I'm getting more and more tempted to buy one of those replica medieval pilgrimage badges with the walking vulva wearing a hat.

[www.medievalbadges.org]

 Reply

First of all, I'm not accepting the "this is not art, this is shock schlock" from anyone who hasn't read the novel. I haven't read it. I'll decide if it's well-written if and when I do, and I don't plan to do that totally based on the content.

Now back to how gross the author should have gotten. I mean, why do your standards have to apply? Sure, you wouldn't wipe your vadge all over a public restroom. The limits of your gross behaviors aren't the rule, you know. I'm sure some people do it. Personally, I'd rather hear that story than read about someone who daintily lays TP all over the bowl before sitting.

And let's not pretend we haven't all done some weird shit (probably in our teens) just because we could, in privacy. And no, I'm not sharing which, if any, of Helen's exploits I've shared :)

 Reply

There is a plot, albeit one which needed a lot more exploring and could have been very interesting were it not for the totally gross descriptions every 2 seconds. In fact the subplot deals with divorce, abandonment, growing up, all sorts of interesting things. It's a shame Roche didn't make the writing in her book smaller, and the story larger because it could be a real stand out work.

Also there are grosser bits. Seriously. One moment made me, someone who reads about serial killers and STDs when they are bored, wince so much and then gag. Gag so hard I tasted sick. Honest. It crossed the line of everything and I felt horrified.

And finally the ending (WHICH I WILL NOT GIVE AWAY) was SO completely, 100% un-feminist that personally I think it negates any of the 'power' of the book. Think being rescued by a knight in shining white armour. Yeah.

 Reply

GET OFF J.D. SALINGER'S LAWN!!!1111!!11!

 Reply

And that's just it. Being a woman involves a lot of stuff that hitherto was seen as "weird" because "nice girls" don't talk about "down there." Vaginas need to be written about. They need to be seen as normal. They produce fluids and smells. That's what they do: they're vaginas. But Moe and Sadie weren't actively trying to fuck their shit up. They were dealing with forgotten tampons and yeast infection cures; they were trying to rectify situations in which something WASN'T the norm.

I think that's why Moe and Sadie's pieces resonated a lot more with me. They were writing about their experiences because they had a forum in which it was possible for women to share their embarrassing/harrowing vagina scare stories, and laugh it off and feel better about it all. Wetlands seems to only exist to be gross.

I'm not sure where I'm going with this. Just pontificating. Again. As usual.

 Reply