<![CDATA[Jezebel: camilla parker-bowles]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: camilla parker-bowles]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/camillaparkerbowles http://jezebel.com/tag/camillaparkerbowles <![CDATA[Bowles Tackles Knowles]]> Camilla vs. Beyonce: It's on. [UPI]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5414073&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hats Off At Ascot]]> The array of whimsical toppers at Ascot's Opening Day, the Oscars of Hats, led us to inaugurate the first annual Arbitrary Hat Awards, cause who doesn't like being gratuitously judgey?



Pippi Longstocking Memorial Award for Excellence in Braiding.


Lifetime Achievement Award


The Creationist Award for Excellence in Literalism


The Edgard Allen Poe Memorial Award


The Gamfield Award in Chimney Sweeping Possibilities


The Frank Lloyd Wright Award for Excellence in Form and Function


The Martha Stewart Award for Excellence in Ribbon-Curling.


The Alice Waters Award in Locavore Excellence


The Ray Krok Convenience in Snacking Award


The Pulitzer Award for Hard-Hitting Timeliness in Chapeaux


The Obligatory Award For All Royal Cousins in a Position to Introduce People to Princes, Even If That's Not as Exciting as That Used to Be Award


The Clark Kent Award fro Excellence in Crappy Disguises


The Inbred Talent for Looking Natural in Top Hat Award


The Henry Higgins' Mother Award for Wearing a Pink Hat to Ascot.


[Images via Getty]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5295742&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Camilla Is The Only One Amused By Her Hat]]>

[London, England, June 13. Image via Getty.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5289570&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mel Gibson's Divorce Is In Conflict With His Catholicism]]> Frances Kissling with Salon has an idea what lesson über-Catholic Mel Gibson's divorce should teach (other than don't grow this goatee). She thinks Mel is why the Pope ought to allow divorce.

If you haven't been paying attention, Mel's wife of 28 years, Robyn Moore, filed for divorce amid rumors of Gibson's infidelity. Gibson, whose theology is slightly behind the Vatican's (example: he believes that his Episcopalian wife is ineligible for entry into heaven), would not be allowed to remarry within the Church once the civil divorce is complete, unless he seeks to annul the nearly three-decade union and allow his children to be declared bastards by the Church — in fact, if he gets married again at all, his second marriage would be considered tantamount to adultery in the eyes of the Vatican (not that, if the rumors are true, he's necessarily got an issue with being considered an adulterer). Kissling thinks that, even for Mel Gibson, this sucks — and, after all, it's not like the Church hasn't changed its mind before.

Women, especially, feel like the church is telling them they were having illicit sex and their kids are illegitimate. The feisty ones appeal to the Vatican. Sheila Rauch Kennedy appealed the 1996 Boston Diocese tribunal's decision to grant her husband Joseph Kennedy, the son of Robert Kennedy, an annulment on the grounds they were immature. She said it wasn't true. In 2007, the Vatican agreed with Rauch Kennedy and reversed the annulment.

No one, even Mel Gibson, should need to go through such hypocrisy. If the church could figure out a way to redefine "outside the church there is no salvation," to forgive Galileo, to abolish limbo, it can certainly find a way to recognize that valid marriages fail and let people move on to new relationships with dignity.

Maybe they can get on that whole "birth control" thing next?

Over at The Daily Beast, Barbie Latza Nadeau does see signs that the Vatican might be softening to the idea of divorce, given the Pope's recent tête-à-tête with Prince Charles and Camilla, who is herself divorced from a Catholic (yes, that matters, too).

While neither she nor Charles are Catholic, Lady Camilla was married to one and as such is seen as an "unforgiven" in the church. The fact that she was granted a private audience, according to many Vatican watchers, may signal an easing of the church's intransigent opposition to divorce, especially given the timing of the visit. The meeting comes just days after the 500th anniversary of Henry VIII's break with the Roman Catholic church over his own divorce, which led to the creation of the Church of England.

So, if a sign of the Vatican softening on divorce is its willingness to have its leader photographed with a non-Catholic who was divorced 500 years after a predecessor of her new husband created his own church in order to get divorced, I'm thinking Mel Gibson might have to wait on a Catholic second wife, or his kids might have to get used to being born out of wedlock.

Mel Gibson's Family Values [Salon]
Is The Pope Softening On Divorce? [The Daily Beast]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5229946&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Camilla Parker Bowles Wishes You A Beary Merry Christmas]]>

[Tetbury, England, December 22. Image via Getty.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5117650&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bruni & Sarkozy Bid "Bonjour" To Camilla & Charles]]>

[Paris, November 10. Image via Splash.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083064&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The New England Historic Genealogical Society...]]> The New England Historic Genealogical Society decided to delve deep into the family trees of the current democratic primary candidates, and boy, did they find out some weird shit. In addition to Dick Cheney, Barack Obama is distantly related to Brad Pitt, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Lyndon Johnson, Harry S. Truman, James Madison, Winston Churchill, and General Robert E. Lee. Hillary Clinton is distantly related to Angelina Jolie, Madonna, Celine Dion, Alanis Morissette, Jack Kerouac and Camilla Parker-Bowles. According to the Genealogical Society, "Pitt and Obama are ninth cousins, linked by Edwin Hickman, who died in Virginia in 1769 [and] Clinton and Jolie are ninth cousins, twice removed, both related to Jean Cusson who died in St. Sulpice, Quebec, in 1718." [AP]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372061&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Prince Charles And Camilla: In It For The Latkes]]>

[London, December 12. Image via INF.]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334867&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Not only are real-life women being forced...]]> Not only are real-life women being forced into impossible standards of thinness, but so are fakes! At the unveiling of her wax figure at Madame Tussaud's, attendees were shocked to see a newfound slimness around the hips in the faux Camilla Parker Bowles. Madame Tussaud's, of course, insists that wax Bowles' proportions are the same as real Bowles'. Question: If plastic surgery is done on wax, is it still called plastic surgery? [NY Post]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305582&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Some Feminists Not Feeling Bag Maker's Date Rape/Prom Nostalgia]]> Are we the only ones who failed to lose our virginity at our high school prom? Even Camilla Parker-Bowles got some at her teenage "coming out" party, says Page Six. According to the gossip column, a British documentary airing tomorrow will report that Camilla "lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante ball" in 1954. But back on task! We'd been hearing that nostalgia for the old cherry-puncturing dress-up fests was, like, hot right now (we've even been invited to a few "80s prom" parties, but didn't attend because we don't drink Sparks), so it was probably inevitable that the trend would manifest itself in mainstream advertising sooner or later. Less inevitable, at least to us, was the subsequent backlash from feminists over the use of the words "stole" in close proximity to "virginity" in this ad. After the jump, the ad itself, and our Moe's thoughts for the feminists and the ad agency.

Timbuk2.jpg

Moeranter: wait, ok, so this ad is basically saying..
Moeranter: this bag will not last!
Moeranter: who makes up that copy?
Moeranter: i had to read like 3 times to understand that the BAG not LASTING was actually intended to create DEMAND for said bag...
Moeranter: cause generally, you think of a bag not lasting...and you think
Moeranter: yeah, because my foundation bottle broke and there are tiny flesh-colored shards of glass embedded everywhere.
Moeranter: or because the strap broke
Moeranter: which BTW happened with a kenneth cole backpack i bought like two months ago.
Moeranter: ok, another thought.
Moeranter: it is better to be novicely terrible at both drinking and sex
Moeranter: than old and experienced and good
Moeranter: nothing was as fun as getting drunk in high school
Moeranter: and nothing ever will be.
Moeranter: wait, also...
Moeranter: that ad is supposed to be like really offensive?
Moeranter: ???
annabananas: according to the feminist?
annabananas: yes
annabananas: not so much to me
Moeranter: that is like the least offensive ad ever
annabananas: i mean it's a little iffy but not enough to get all crazeee over
Moeranter: I mean who doesn't appreciate a rape joke now and then
Moeranter: as long as it isn't this DUMB??
[Kidding! —Ed.]

Rape: Both Marketable And Hilarious [Women In Media & News, via NowPublic]
Royal Servant [NYPost]

]]>
http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264757&view=rss&microfeed=true