Jezebel 
Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #cscotthemphill more → 
9/11 Truther Nabs Fancy Perfume Campaign
New York, 12:49 AM
Sat Dec 19
73 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan Morrissey
| Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter
Reporter:
Irin Carmon
| Twitter
Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter
Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Latoya Peterson
Email
Jenna Sauers
Lizzie Skurnick
Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter
Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter
| posts about #cscotthemphill more → |
9/11 Truther Nabs Fancy Perfume Campaign |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
05/14/09
05/14/09
Nah, just some of 'em.
(Sorry. I'll stop now.)
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
"It was very clumsy of me to bring up a subject as important as 9/11 in a TV Show. It was neither the topic nor the place for it. And I?m far from being a suitable person to talk about it. But I never claimed - as it was written and said - that the insurance companies destroyed the towers. I only explained that I don't believe everything the government and media are telling us. My words were taken out of their original context and misinterpreted. Who am I to have an explanation? Nevertheless, I think there remain many mysteries in the official explanation. Numerous American citizens are asking for the re-opening of the investigation. An investigation deserving of that name. This event changed many things in the world, so asking oneself questions when there?s such a lack of clarity appears to me legitimate."
05/14/09
Thousands of people died on that day. How are her remarks -- "Numerous American citizens are asking for the re-opening of the investigation" -- any different than, say, arguing that there are "mysteries in the official explanation" of the Holocaust?
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
The only thing it seems to me that COULD be copyrighted without a shadow of a doubt is exact pattern layouts (thus preventing other makers from simply ripping apart one designer's product and copying it straight out), names and logos. Anything other than that seems to run completely contrary to the viral nature of fashion itself.
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
@LvV: @Merkin: exactly. I have no idea how they could properly enforce this it seems like all it would do was run smaller design houses right out of business with a mountain of legal bills.
05/14/09
In other news, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy once again proves to the world that she is not just like them and never will be. Her fabulousness knows no bounds, and now where she lives will be more fab too. SUCK IT, GISELLE.
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
And yeah, I would pay Aldo's prices if their shoes seemed nice, but they don't.
05/14/09
good point about the different perspectives on costs. if a $700 skirt is normal, of course a $300 one sounds sweet. i think hard about a $30 skirt.
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
Not even after one wash, after one WEARING. Free People is disgustingly bad quality, and I say this as someone who worked in a boutique that sold a lot of it!
It's made of fluff and held together with prayers and silly string.
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
05/14/09
[urbncounterfeiters.blogspot.com]
05/14/09
05/14/09