<![CDATA[Jezebel: Breasts]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: Breasts]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/breasts http://jezebel.com/tag/breasts <![CDATA[ The Rack Is Always Greener ]]> I appreciate that stars like Keira Knightley are refusing to bend to Hollywood standards of beauty, I really do. I admire anyone who's comfortable in her own skin and understands that a variety of body types are beautiful. But it baffles me when I see stories like the Post's "Flat and Happy" - "sometimes bigger isn't better!" — because, while, sure, men might like the busty pin-up, I and lots of the other breast-possessing women I know would prefer a chest like Keira's. Breasts may still equate to sex appeal, but for a lot of us that's not a great thing. Breast-centric attention, after all, is not the kind most women crave.

Then too, it's a reality that any such supposed sex appeal is at the expense of style. Clothes are not designed for breasts, especially for the past few seasons. And anyone with an above-average chest can attest to the ability of a bosom to turn even the most demure and elegant of ensembles into an unintentionally sexy exercise in blowsiness. Bras are a pain in the neck — literally — and less pretty in more generous sizes. Plus we live with the knowledge of the breasts' ultimate descent.

Don't get me wrong, I like my figure and am a confident sort of naked person. In the right threads, there's no denying that breasts denote a certain bombshell appeal. But sometimes it seems like there's a fiction that because of those inexplicable creatures who crave implants, there's a general conspiracy against small breasts, when to many of us they just equate to chicness and ease.

Flat and Happy [New York Post]

]]>
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:00:00 EDT Sadie Stein http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033293&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 4 Things I Hate About <i>Esquire</i>'s "10 Things You Don't Know About Women" ]]> Women's magazines are full of tips about understanding the male gender via heavily edited anecdotes from a handful of highly mainstream twentysomethings. August's Cosmo, for instance, offers insight into "males' deepest sex secrets" — and then delivers a dude named Jim telling you not to kiss his chest. However, this kind of bullshitty inductive reasoning is not solely the province of the ladymag — Esquire does it too, in their "10 Things You Don't Know About Women" feature. We know Step Brothers Actress Andrea Savage is trying to be fun and funny in this month's list, but we're really not amused.

First things first:

"1. Wedding rings need to be sparkly to remind us not to have sex with other people."

I'm not married, but my boyfriend keeps me in line with eye jewelry. I can't see other men, and when they see me, they run away retching. Seriously, plenty of women manage not to cheat despite having neither a ring nor a marriage. Also, way to spread the notion that what keeps women happy and committed is diamonds, as opposed to, like, a healthy relationship.

2. Completely shaving your genitals does not make them look bigger. It just makes you look gayer.

Ew, gay!

4. Murdering someone because he snores should be admissible in a court of law.

What should be the penalty for regurgitating annoying relationship clichés, Andrea?

And finally:

8. We don’t understand your fascination with boobs, but we’re happy you have it.

Really? Many women I know find boobs — and the female body in general — beautiful and fascinating. Items two and eight speak to a sexual rigidity and that's all over women's magazines too. This don't-kiss-my-chest-don't-shave-your-genitals rhetoric isn't just prudish, it's also really damaging, because it perpetuates the idea that all men are the same, all women are the same, and men and women are totally different from each other. And that if you want to know what a woman thinks you should read a magazine instead of, you know, asking her.

10 Things You Don't Know About Women: Andrea Savage [Esquire]

]]>
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:30:00 EDT Intern Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031157&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ For Some Women, Big Boobs Are A Pain In The Butt (And Back And Neck) ]]> We often hear about women who are unhappy with their breast size, but it's usually those with smaller breasts who wish they were bigger. The BBC documentary My Big Breasts and Me explores the flip side of the coin: Women with very large, natural breasts who suffer both physical and psychological repercussions from such their "heavy" burdens. One of the women featured is 23-year-old Jodi, who is 5'1 with a bra size of 28K. She says it's difficult to find a bra that fits her well, and studying to be a musician, she also says that her breasts get in the way when she plays piano. Her back hurts often, and she said that it's nearly impossible to run. For 19-year-old Maddy, who wears a size F, the problem is more about fashion. She finds that her breasts limit her wardrobe options (I feel her on that one; so sick of sack dresses), and she feels the need to wear large blousy tops that hide her boobs, and make her look less like "a porn star." Clip above.

]]>
Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:00:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012463&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ At What Age Is A Kid Too Old To Breastfeed? ]]> Extraordinary Breastfeeding is a documentary that aired in England a few years ago and focused on the country's discomfort with breastfeeding. Issues raised in the film included the right to breastfeed in public, breastfeeding adopted children, and at what age children should be weaned off breast milk. (The average age around the world is four years old, and the World Health Organization recommends that children be breastfed until they are at least two and a half years old.) One woman in the documentary, Veronica, believes that children should decide for themselves when they want to stop. Her daughter is about to turn eight, still breastfeeds, and has absolutely no plans of stopping. Clip — which is somewhat NSFW — above.


Related: Little Britain: Meeting The Parents [YouTube]

]]>
Mon, 12 May 2008 19:00:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389626&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cleavage At Work: Yay Or Nay? ]]> SALMAcleavage050808.jpgCan we talk about cleavage? Specifically in a work-related context? A piece by Christina Brinkley in today's Wall Street Journal has a quote from Gail Graham, executive vice president of marketing for Fidelity Investments, who recounts how respected co-worker showed up at a business dinner in a "practically" backless dress that showed cleavage. Male colleagues were talking about it days later. Graham states: "It became the story about her. You want the story to be about you and your accomplishments. There's no greater crime [for a businesswoman] than to show cleavage." Surely Angela Merkel would disagree! But seriously: Is it possible to maintain an air of professionalism and earn respect at work when your boobs are on display?


As a chick with a big rack I'm divided (heh) on this issue. On one hand, fuck a mothertrucker who can't concentrate and look you in the eye just because you're wearing a scoopneck shirt. Any modern woman knows that getting dressed for work is hard enough. Guys have interchangeable suits and ties; we have skirts, cardigans, blouses, shirts, tanks, camis, trousers, pantsuts, skirt suits and dress suits. And if your chest is large, finding a jacket or button down shirt that will contain the twins without pulling or buckling is pretty damn tough. So the more scooped out and open a garment is in the bosom area, the better. My old job was pretty casual and I'd rock some cleavage now and then. My attitude was "If I'm comfortable, then I'm getting work done, and that's all that matters." Just because my cups runneth over doesn't mean I have to cover 'em up like a nun. Also, I can't just put them away in a drawer and pull them out on Friday night. It doesn't work that way.

That said, I'm not a lawyer or an international bond trader. Salma Hayek might be able to wear low-cut stuff every day of the week, but, as Jonathan Fitzgarrald, director of marketing for a Los Angeles law firm tells the Journal, "If my attorney bills out at $1,000 an hour, I want them to look like a lawyer, not a celebrity." Because, yeah, on the other hand: Cleavage can look downright trashy. Sometimes it looks sloppy, like you're in need of some support, like your clothes are ill-fitting. And also, it reminds one of, oh, I dunno, Loni Anderson, Pam Anderson, Chrissie from Three's Company and other women not known for their smarts. Maybe the patriarchy did this to me. Maybe if bond traders, scientists, lawyers and doctors wore low-cut tops then cleavage would seem like no big deal. Maybe if Americans didn't only think of boobs as sexual objects but as just a regular part of a woman's anatomy actually intended for feeding infants, then cleavage would seem like no big deal. The truth is, I don't even really like cleavage all that much. As some comedienne once said, I don't need my bra to lift and separate; I need it to divide and conquer.

Risky Business: Décolletage At A Work Dinner [Wall Street Journal]

Earlier: New Bra Makes Women "Flawless" By Erasing Their Nipples
"Contour" Bras: Holding Us Up, Or Holding Us Back?
With Great Breast Size Comes Great Responsibility
German Titocracy
Do Bouncy Breasts Make Women Skip Workouts?

]]>
Thu, 08 May 2008 13:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breast Intentions ]]> hollymadison0326.jpgMore not-surprising news from the fashion overlords: Boobs are "out" this season. Which is fine and dandy if you're a gay man who dresses (and hates) women but, uh, good luck successfully shilling that message to the ladies! [Telegraph]

]]>
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:45:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breast Intentions ]]> kellykellykelly030608.jpgAs previously seen and reported, Kelly Rowland has implants now. In the new issue of People, Rowland claims, "I simply went from an A-cup to a B-cup. I didn't want double Ds and be a little bitty size 2. That would look nuts." She explains why she upgraded: She really wanted to wear "this one really hot House of Dereon top — I just wanted to fill that out!" The article later alludes back to that hot top, ending triumphantly: "And that House of Dereon top? "I put it on and I looked SO good!" she says with a laugh. "I'm so happy. I feel complete." [Much Music, Dark Hat]

]]>
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:20:00 EST Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364743&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Big Bust = Big Bucks ]]> vintagebra012808.jpgAs those whose cups runneth over may know, the bigger a bra, the more it costs. But good news for shoppers at Asda, a British retailer owned by Wal-Mart. The store carries a brand called George, and, says brand director Fiona Lambert in a statement, "From now on, all bras at George will be exactly the same price from A cup through to F cup." Ladies with big racks rejoice! And treat yourself to a shoulder massage. [Reuters]

]]>
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:30:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349685&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fake Titstimonials: We Asked, You Answered ]]> heidi11708.jpgToday's New York Times Thursday Styles follows up its story about possibly narcissistic kids with one about narcissistic women, or rather, how breast implants, unlike diamonds, won't last forever. (Yes, we know that not all breast implant recipients are narcissists.) Dr. Linda Huang, a Denver plastic surgeon, charges $5,000 to remove implants and roughly $7,500 to replace old ones and snarks, "If they would rather spend their money on a trip to Paris than on me, then I recommend they do not have breast augmentation to begin with." The Times story reminded us of a post from the other day, on which many readers admitted to riding the silicone wave. "I got fake tits last year to correct their asymmetry [and] I feel heaps better now that I am symmetrical. I have silicone gel implants and while they are harder than natural, they aren't rocks. Just 'firm,'" said one commenter. Said another: "I had that condition where your boobs are more long than round (my Dr. said aprox 20% of women have it) and part of getting it corrected entailed getting fake boobs put in. Did wonders for my self esteem & body image, no regrets whatsoever."



And not all of you breasty babes got implants because of "conditions" or "asymmetries." "I'm 5'11 190lbs and they are 38D from a 38AA. They are proportioned and look swell," said one enthusiast. "They feel great. I Love 'em. He loves 'em. That is all." But it's not all sunshine and lollipops for women with under the skin strap-ons!

I got mine courtesy of an abusive ex boyfriend who REALLY wanted me to have them. I was against them and had previously made fun of people with them, but at the time he had me feeling about one-inch tall and also had me under the impression that he was my only friend in the world. After 4 months of mentioning it to me daily, I agreed to go to a consult just to get him to shut up about it. The doctor (also Dolly Parton & Cher's doc), was really nice, but also convinced me that I had (previously un-noticed) assymetry by an entire cup size. Long story short, the ex wanted them so bad he agreed to pay for them if I would get them - I agreed because at the time I would have done anything to make him happy (what was WRONG with me!?), and now I have fake tits. They're not so bad. If I had a ton of money, I would remove them just because of the horrible person who's suggestion this was for me to have them. But overall, they're not bad. I was blown away (horrified) by the difference in positive attention I started getting from men from the second I got my new boobs.
Oh c'mon, we're sure the attention wasn't just because of the new tatters! We bet dudes just loved gazing at you because of your great, big, round personality.

Do My Breast Implants Have A Warranty? [New York Times]

Earlier: Heidi Montag Explains What It's Really Like Having Breast Implants

]]>
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:40:00 EST Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346133&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Now up on Cosmopolitan's website: "Have you ... ]]> cosmo122807.jpgNow up on Cosmopolitan's website: "Have you ever been embarrassed by your breasts?" Love that Cosmo! Always so adept at creating insecurities women didn't know they were supposed to have! [Cosmopolitan]

]]>
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:45:00 EST Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338398&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Contour" Bras: Holding Us Up, Or Holding Us Back? ]]> dkny-cotton-cool-plunge-contour-bra.jpgDo you find it torturous to go bra shopping because 95% of what's available falls into the "contoured" bra category? As in: the bras that are supposed to be "lined" when really, they're just padded, unyielding cups? For some of us with larger breasts, it is torturous, because contour bras can make it even more difficult to button our shirts. But more importantly, these bras make it impossible for those of us who wish to use our nipples to our advantage, since the cups are designed to hide them. A story on the New York Observer's website today reports on the troubling trend that makes finding a sexy bra such a chore.
'I always try and push them, because it gives a better lift and you don't see the nipples peeking through,' said Heather, a young lingerie saleswomen in mod makeup, a black mini-dress and furry boots who was working at Saks Fifth Avenue's lingerie department the other day, holding a hanger with two silky but sturdy cups dangling from straps.

Her colleague, Carolina, concurred: 'A lot of women have problems with their'—and here her voice dropped to a whisper—'nipples showing.'
Good god, are we always gonna have to hide our femininity in order to be taken seriously?

Not that I would know what that's like: I work at this job all day in a muumuu and no bra, and my previous job was in an all-female environment. So I guess I've been afforded the luxury of actually liking my nipples, or at least, not feeling the need to hid them.

Recently, I bought one of those "T-shirt" bras from The Gap for an event I had to go to. It was my only option, since it was all they had (and since I've completely given up on Victoria's Secret). Problem was, my tits kept falling out of it. And it's not like I bought the wrong size. My boobs just do not want to conform to that cup shape, and they particularly are adverse to being pushed together, as they seem to be sticking to this whole divide-and-conquer theme.

A bra I bought at Agent Provocateur however, was not only cute, it was devoid of annoying padding, with a layer of thin, comfortable fabric that actually let my nipples be, you know, nipples. But that shit cost me like a bajillion dollars. (Real price: $160). I guess what it comes down to is that nowadays, you have to pay an obscene amount of money to look "obscene."


Pad Girls! Attack of the 21st-Century Falsies
[NY Observer]

]]>
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:00:00 EST Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335162&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ With Great Breast Size Comes Great Responsibility ]]> boobs121007.jpgIn an essay from today's Salon, staffer Sarah Hepola laments the tyranny of her enormous ta tas, a size which she calls "34 ridiculous". "I am embarrassed by my knockers," Hepola writes. "And the fact that something I am embarrassed about is the first thing people notice about me? Well, that kinda sucks. I feel like I could save a baby from a burning building, I could cure cancer with glitter alone, and I would still be referred to as 'Sarah, you know, the short one with the big tits.'"

Sadly, Hepola is so terrified to go bra shopping that she puts it off for years. And although her trips to NYC bra meccas Town Shop and Orchard Corset were successful in that she found bras that fit, they didn't exactly make her feel like a sex goddess — most of the bras looked like they could be used to "parachute out of a plane."

Hepola also wonders if her self-loathing is cultural as she "grew up in an all-white town full of skinny, flat-chested white girls with straight blond hair, girls who were praying (literally praying) for their periods in seventh grade while I was crying over my frizzy hair and hiding my sanitary napkins at sleepovers."

Though her bras might not be pretty, Hepola can take solace in the fact that new technology is being designed to make her boulder holders more supportive. Scientists have developed an "intelligent fabric," which, according to the Telegraph, uses sensors to test the movement of breasts during exercise. This study of breasts in motion will hopefully lead to improvements in bra construction, as big breasted women are currently "at risk of long-term injury because much of the support is given by the straps that bear down on their shoulders."

Maybe once the physical weight of her breasts is off her shoulders, the mental weight of Sarah's breasts will dissipate? For her sake, we hope so.

Busting Out [Salon]
Scientists Develop 'Intelligent Bra' With Sensors [Telegraph]
Earlier: British Women Have Enormous Breasts

]]>
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:30:00 EST Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331885&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ British Women Have Enormous Breasts ]]> jordan111607.jpgBritish department store Marks & Spencer is rolling out a J-cup bra, and it has newspapers all over England tittering about the increasing size of the average woman's breasts. The Mirror insists that the average bra size in the UK is 34DD/34E, while the Daily Mail says the median breast size in England is a mere 36C, up from a 34B a generation ago. Regardless, both papers discuss the reasons behind the growth of women's breasts in the past ten years. They tend to attribute the increased bustiness to a combination of weight gain, birth-control pills and possibly artificial hormones in the food supply.

67-year-old granny Barbara Haywood tells the Daily Mail, "In my day it was only old, stout ladies who had big bosoms - the sort who might lean over the garden fence and talk to the neighbours. But today it's young women, such as my granddaughter Miranda, who seem to wear the biggest bra sizes."

The Mail also wonders if the national increase in bra size can be explained through the popularity of implants (cough Jordan cough). 10,000 breast implant surgeries are performed each year in the UK.

Why ARE Women's Figures Getting So Much Fuller? [The Daily Mail]
Storm In A J-cup [The Mirror]

]]>
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:30:00 EST Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323577&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Judith & Liz Care About Your Breasts ]]> 14%20judith%20nathan.jpgTomorrow, the Dartmouth-Hitchcock's Norris Cotton Cancer Center and the Vermont-New Hampshire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure are hosting a Leadership Summit on Breast Cancer, and who do you think their special guests are? Why, two potential first ladies! That's right, Judith "Crazy Eye" Nathan Giuliani and Elizabeth Kucinich will be special guest speakers to let everyone know what their husbands' policies on breast cancer will be if they will. I'm guessing it'll be pretty much the same: breast cancer is bad. Other things I'm sure about:

  • This has nothing to do with it being in New Hampshire
  • This has nothing to do with Crazy Eyes polling poorly among women voters.
  • Crazy Eyes suddenly using only her married name has nothing to do with Hillary Rodham Clinton
  • This also has nothing to do with Rudi [sic] polling poorly among women voters because he left his wife to marry Crazy Eyes after announcing their affair on TV.
  • This has everything to do with breast cancer.
  • Everyone there would rather talk to/ get their picture taken with Elizabeth.
]]>
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:30:00 EST mcarpentier http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318952&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Short Girls With Large Tits: "Experts" Would Rather You Looked Fat Than Slutty ]]> karen.jpgAs I have said on at least one previous occasion, I used to think that, for a heterosexual woman, I spend a lot of time thinking about (usually my) breasts. However, come to find out, I'm not alone! We all wonder how that most visible sign of our sexuality makes us look in the eyes of others! The advice of "experts" comes down to this: put 'em away, ladies, because no one takes us seriously if they're big and/or exposed.

Today, HuffPo blogger/self-help book author/owner of the far-from-poorly- displayed breasts seen here, Karen Salmansohn, appeared on the Today show (below) and blogged about cleavage in the workplace.

Cleavage at the office: Inappropriate?
Cleavage at the office: Inappropriate?

Her initial point is that all us ladies "know" when we're showing off too much cleavage. To a degree, yes, she's right. I know what shirts are office-appropriate and which are decidedly not, based on a cursory examination in the mirror. However, it has also come to my attention that, as a rather short person, what my boobs look like from where my eyes sit and from where the eyes of a much taller man sit are two starkly different things. Having seen pictures from certain angles, I can guarantee that I had no idea when I left the house that there was not only some cleavage but actual curvature showing (which is probably the office-appropriate line in my profession). So, despite Karen's assertion, you really don't always know (and, you may never know unless someone tells you).

In addition, she says that covering them up as much as possible while still being feminine is the best option, which sounds good on the surface. However, it's a little harder in practice. Let's try, say, turtlenecks? Wearing a turtleneck doesn't do anything to minimize one's ability to notice my breasts, believe me, plus everyone then thinks I have a hickey. High-necked shirts tend to make me look prissy and/or frumpy and, if they hang straight down from my breasts (rather than angling in), I look heavier and/or pregnant. I'm short, so there's not a lot of space between my collar bone and my cleavage, making it difficult, at best, to buy something in the middle. I have tried every single minimizing strategy with little success (besides buying one of the horrific contraptions that bind them down and keep them from moving) and the end results were: everyone still knew I had big knockers, more people thought I was uncomfortable with them, some people overestimated my weight, and I hated every piece of clothing I owned because I felt like I was trying to hide my body, rather than clothe it. Plus, how many times have you heard a more masculinely-attired or covered-up woman get called a "dyke" or something similar? It's a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't scenario, and everybody knows that.

Even worse, Karen also cites "research" that those of us rather decidedly "blessed" with big ones automatically get taken less seriously by men. And, to this, my response is, um, assholes? The size of my breasts are not at all a determinant of my level of intelligence or my ability to do my job. The fat cells in my chest have no bearing whatsoever on my intellectual capabilities, I promise, though they may well affect my archery skills and ability to pitch in baseball games.

So, I guess I wonder: when we're running around castigating and judging other women (or men) for the appropriateness of their bodies (whether that be weight, or breast size, clothing choices or hairstyles) and scheduling TV segments and writing blog posts about how women ought to dress to fit preconceived notions about what one's sexuality (or race, or clothing choices) says about one's intelligence, can we maybe try having one person on who says that it's time to start talking about why we have these preconceived notions and how to stop? I mean, rather than just discussing what people can do to satisfy better those preconceived notions? Kthxbai.

]]>
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:30:35 EDT mcarpentier http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316480&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ What Does It Take For A 32A To Get Hired By Hooters? ]]> Did you hear? It's National Breast Cancer Awareness Month! And interestingly — creepily? — just three days into the titular celebration, the breasts 'n wings restaurant chain Hooters held a big blowout to celebrate the 10th anniversary of its first Manhattan outpost. A Hooters virgin until then (and a woman with the upper torso of a five-year-old [Stop bragging. -Ed.]), it took all the courage I could muster to face the room of bigger breasts I was certain to encounter. Luckily, I had surrogate brother/cleavage connoisseur Nikola Tamindzic by my side, and he helped me quiz the well-endowed women in attendance about what it takes (besides big tits!) to get hired as a down-home Hooters girl. Their responses, and a gallery from the party, after the jump.


(Begin viewing gallery by clicking on any image above)


Janae, NYC Hooters employee:
Okay, well, there are some different questions here. Are you asking about the New York City Hooters or any other one? [Me: Uh, both?] Okay, well at any other Hooters, you need really big boobs. Really big. But in New York you don't need to. They don't care what you look like here. And you're pretty! I bet they would make you head Hooters girl, even though you have small boobs. Seriously, the only requirements to work here are be really peppy and, uh, be a girl.

Jasmine, NYC Hooters employee: You have to be really good at multi-tasking. You know, doing lots of different things at the same time? And you have to always be happy. When they're hiring, they're looking for girls who are good on their feet. There is no certain look. I know people say you have to look a certain way, but it's not true. Look around — all the girls here look different.

Jessica, Toledo, OH: Miss January: Oh you just have to be really personable! It's so much fun working at Hooters — really! Because at most jobs, if you're a waitress, you're just doing one thing. But here you're being a waitress and you're interacting with the table. The only trick is to just go out there and have fun, definitely. You're totally cute - I bet they would hire you right away. By the way, this is my first time in New York and tomorrow I want to go shopping; I'm looking for cheap bags. Where do you go for those? Somebody told me Chinatown?

Briane, Newnan, GA: Miss June: I've been working at Hooters for 4 years and this is my 3rd year in the calendar. The only trick is to go in and just start working hard — you just have to get used to how hard the work is, because you have to worry about so many things at once and entertain your tables. You have to have fun with customers and work. But like seriously, can I give you some advice? Don't let people make you feel bad about yourself because you work at Hooters. If you enjoy it, you enjoy. And when you start working here, there are people that are going to give you some pretty funny looks when they ask you what you do and you tell them. Don't let other people put you down. And I really do enjoy! And I have a full schedule to go back to next week — I have so many shifts next week because I am missing some this week to promote the calendar. But I'm not planning on leaving anytime soon; I'm working my way through college. Oh and can I give you one other piece of advice to tell girls? When you're getting dressed, either show leg or show cleavage. Not both. Don't show both if you want to look classy.

Becky, Nashville, TN: Miss October: Just come in and apply! That's really all you have to do if you want to work at Hooters. Apply and be confident. Oh, and put your makeup on. It's really not that hard.

Shawna, St. Petersberg, Fl: Miss April: You just need to get the application and then go and start trying out for the calendar right away! And keep trying to be in the calendar! Even if you don't make it at first, you eventually will.

Jennifer, Ft. Myers, Fl:
Miss September: Expect to have lots of fun, lots of opportunities, and make lots of new friends! They're looking for the all-American cheerleader. You know, like the girl next door? You have to have that look to work here. You need to look like a cheerleader. And you totally do.


]]>
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:00:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307020&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ First Woman With Breast Implants Still In Agony After All These Years ]]> timmiejean100107.jpgIn 1962, Texan Timmie Jean Lindsey became the first woman to receive breast implants. Timmie Jean, who is now a 75-year-old great-grandmother, granted an interview to the Daily Mail and, though she was really a guinea pig, says she is a "pioneer" who is proud of what she's done. Still, her journey has been long and difficult. When she was 15, she married a carpenter, and had six kids in nine years. She left him when she was 26 and started dating a Mexican immigrant named Fred Reyes, who persuaded her to have red roses tattooed on each of her breasts. She regretted the decision and went to visit a charity clinic, where a young plastic surgeon, Frank Gerow, offered to remove the tattoos using dermabrasion. And when she came back for a follow-up visit, Dr. Gerow suggested Timmie Jean test out his new procedure for sagging breasts: The silicone implant. Timmie Jean was surprised. "It wasn't my breasts that bothered me, it was my ears," she says. "I told Dr Gerow I'd do the new breasts if he would fix my ears."



Although doctors had previously injected silicone directly into women's breasts (resulting in massive inflammatory reactions, ugh), Timmie Jean became the first woman ever to have silicone-filled bags implanted into her chest cavity. At first, her breasts "looked beautiful," Timmie Jean says. But ten years after the operation, Timmie Jean's breasts began to harden, she began to experience shooting pains and then "hurting everywhere." Still, her sister-in law and one of her daughters also opted for implants. And when a class-action lawsuit was filed against implant manufacturer Dow Corning, Timmie Jean testified that she had no complaints. (She admits she was paid "a minimal amount" by Dow.) Now, 45 years after her operation, Timmie Jean is afraid to have her implants removed, even though one of them has a small tear in the shell and she experiences pains in her chest that can last for weeks and feel like she's broken a rib.

'I'm a sissy now, she said. 'I'm afraid of what might happen if I go under.'

'I Had The World's First Breast Job - And Endured Years Of Misery,' Says Texan Great-Grandmother [Daily Mail]

]]>
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305615&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breasts & Buffalo Wings: There's Now A Hooters In Beijing ]]> chinesehooters091907.jpgHey, remember how China sent us Dora The Explorer toys covered in lead? You know what might make up for it? The 435th branch of Hooters just opened in Beijing, reports ABC News. (This is actually the fourth Hooters in China; the first Hooters was in "more cosmopolitan" Shanghai.) Beijing — known for the Forbidden City, Tiananmen Square and the Great Wall — has always been more conservative. But the 2008 Summer Olympic Games are 11 months away and the city is preparing — with hot wings and beer!

This kind of globalization isn't complete without the requisite corporate brainwashing. "I like Hooters," said one waitress in an interview with ABC News. "It's very happy. It is enthusiastic and energetic. I love Hooters." You can almost hear the panic in her voice, imagining the kind of shame speaking out against orange short-shorts would bring upon her family.



Anyway, in Beijing, "Hooters" simply means "owl," but that doesn't mean the message gets lost. In fact, the point of the Alabama-based restaurant seems to be universal:

When one Hooters patron was asked whether he preferred the food or the waitstaff, he answered, "The girls better than the food."
Wow, we are so proud to be American!

Globalization Gone Wild: Hooters Opens in China [ABC News]

]]>
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:30:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301630&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breasts And Older Broads: Going, Going, Gone ]]> saggyboob.jpgWe're aware that our breasts will sag as we get older, but we didn't know that they'd deflate completely. But that's what apparently happens, as detailed in a funny piece on Salon written by internist R. Jan Gurley. Dr. Gurley explains that, although there is a medically-recognized timeline of the five stages of breast development called the "Tanner scale" (named for pediatrician Dr. James Mourilyan Tanner), anything charting the shrinkage of breast tissue has been, for the most part, completely ignored by the medical community. Says Gurley:
I mean, why is the growth of breasts named after a man? And what the heck happened to the stages of breast regression? My friends and I want to talk about all the stuff happening to our own bodies as we cruise toward menopause, but we don't have anything like the Tanner stages to use as code. I'm guessing guys have been more interested in describing breast expansion than regression.
Eager to take the matter of breasts into her own hands, Dr. Gurley came up with her own phases of breast regression, which she named, naturally, after herself.

Gurley Stage I: Cup Wrinkle
Also known, among those with more support, as air cups, this stage sneaks up on women in their late 30s and describes when the breast no longer fills out the cup (as though the bra was stretched out, or you've lost a bit of weight).

Gurley Stage II: Loss Recognition
When a woman consciously realizes that her breasts are shrinking; usually occurs during the early to late 40s, coinciding with the onset of random chin hair. [Random chin hair? I started getting those in my early 20s! -Ed.]

Gurley Stage III: The Folds
The stage in which the breasts shrink to the point where there is only a fold of skin lying on the chest. Sets in around the late 40s, early 50s, occurring in the two years prior to the loss of all periods, during the perimenopausal stage.

Gurley Stage IV: The Pressed Flower

Post-menopause. The opposite of the first stage of breast development (the "bud") in which the breasts resemble a pressed flower.

Honey, I Shrunk My Breasts! [Salon]

]]>
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:30:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300882&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Frustrated because you have small breasts ... ]]> Frustrated because you have small breasts and no money with which to augment them? Join the Australian Navy! Apparently, women with small breasts in the Aussie Navy say that their lack of a big rack is impairing their self-confidence so the Navy, concerned with the psychological well-being of its members, is giving the ladies bigger breasts. Is this what they mean by making the military a safer place for women? [Telegraph]

]]>
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:45:00 EDT Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Facebook: Boobs Are For Body-Shots, Not Baby-Feeding ]]> gyllenhaal090707.jpgFacebook has began taking down pictures of women breastfeeding their children and in some cases, even banning users for putting the photos up in the first place. The claim is that such imagery is "obscene content." Okay, we think that women posting pictures of their babies sucking on their boobs is a little weird and maybe even a bit obnoxious, but nothing about it is obscene. 'Cause isn't breastfeeding the whole point of breasts? The Lactivists (an activist group who strive to normalize breastfeeding in public) are all up in arms about the situation, but they're also questioning the logic behind Facebook's no-suckling policy, as the images that were removed contained no nipples. In an official statement, Facebook said that they're not actually opposed to the titty-sucking as much as the actual flesh:
Photos containing an exposed breast do violate our Terms and are removed.

Now, we're not really hippies, and we're certainly not mothers (other than to our dogs and cats), but Christ, just let these people up their mother-child bonding shots if it's so important to them! Where the lines of obscenity are drawn here are just so completely arbitrary and retarded. And so are the Lactivists, actually. They're encouraging people to join their new Facebook group "Hey, Facebook, breastfeeding is not obscene!", which currently has over 7000 members.

Breast Isn't Best On Facebook [TechCrunch]

]]>
Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297412&view=rss&microfeed=true