Did anyone actually read Twilight? It practically is a Christian vampire story. Edward worries that he has no soul, that's half the reason he won't turn Bella into a vampire. Edward's worried about Bella committing a sin, so he won't have sex before marriage. Yeah, there are no actual churches involved, but the underlying Christian themes aren't exactly far below the surface.
@Adah: Actually, I have an internet-friend who makes the case that Twilight is based heavily on LDS folklore and theology. I read her take on it, it's pretty convincing.
@whynotshesaid: "Twilight" pretty much IS Mormon propaganda. that whole "we will get married (right out of high school, no less) and be together for all eternity" thing? Yeah. Stephanie Meyer went to BYU, and obviously A) is very familiar with the theology b) very familiar with Utah (particularly Utah County) Mormon culture and c) lacking the imagination to come up with any ideas of her own.
@Adah: This is EXACTLY what I was thinking. It may be a bit more allegorical, but it definitely lays out a traditionalistic Christian view of love, marriage, family, good vs. evil and the like.
I have no specific interest in vampires, even the stories and characters that balance sexy/scary enough to become interested in ("Interview with a Vampire" or "True Blood", instead of this "Twilight" bullshit).
So, sorry to threadjack but from the first time I saw that damn "Twilight" poster and remember Cedric Diggory, I absolutely understood why Robert Pattinson was chosen to play beautiful teen bloodsucking Byron....the photo used for this post only reinforces that. I pity him a little because of the rabid fans(seriously? How the fuck do people not understand that actors =/= their characters?), some unfortunate potential typecasting, the drawbacks of playing this character, and the fact that the poster looks (gratingly) like another shitty fashion ad, but his face is beautiful here (taking into account that at least SOME of that must be air-brushing). Those pouting lips! He certainly looks the part inhumanly beautiful, undead Adonis.
When he cleans up, indeed, he really is studly/pretty, and he seems like a nice enough guy in interviews...or at least no more of an asshole than any of his heartthrob peers.
@Hana Maru: in Twilight, their skin glitters when in direct sunlight, as opposed to disappearing in a poof of smoke, a la Nosferatu.
On a side note, Joan Acocella and the New Yorker out loud have a podcast edition where she deconstructs the appeal of vampire fiction over the time, interesting stuff. http://www.newyorker.com/online/2009/03/16/090316on_audio_acocella
@notheretomakefriends: further reading for the high-brow liberal in you: http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/03/16/090316crat_atlarge_acocella
So werewolves are going to be the new vampires, which were the new zombies, which were the new pirates, which were the new ninjas, which were the new cowboys, which were the new werewolves? And so the cycle of life continues.
I have to say, I'm kind of liking this development. When I was younger it seemed like all the Christians I knew would freak out at the mention of something ungodly, like a vampire, and I think now a lot of them have mellowed. (My parents, for one, are actually okay with Harry Potter now, which is kind of amazing.)
I guess I think this is a good thing for Christian culture, though a bad thing for vampire culture.
@CGirl: yes indeed, and is responsible for several hours lost reading old articles. That stuff is worse than wikipedia and tvtropes put together (worse for my laundry duties that is)
07/19/09
Oh, ouch. That's right, I went there.
07/19/09
07/19/09
07/19/09
07/19/09
07/18/09
So, sorry to threadjack but from the first time I saw that damn "Twilight" poster and remember Cedric Diggory, I absolutely understood why Robert Pattinson was chosen to play beautiful teen bloodsucking Byron....the photo used for this post only reinforces that. I pity him a little because of the rabid fans(seriously? How the fuck do people not understand that actors =/= their characters?), some unfortunate potential typecasting, the drawbacks of playing this character, and the fact that the poster looks (gratingly) like another shitty fashion ad, but his face is beautiful here (taking into account that at least SOME of that must be air-brushing). Those pouting lips! He certainly looks the part inhumanly beautiful, undead Adonis.
When he cleans up, indeed, he really is studly/pretty, and he seems like a nice enough guy in interviews...or at least no more of an asshole than any of his heartthrob peers.
07/18/09
07/19/09
On a side note, Joan Acocella and the New Yorker out loud have a podcast edition where she deconstructs the appeal of vampire fiction over the time, interesting stuff. http://www.newyorker.com/online/2009/03/16/090316on_audio_acocella
07/19/09
07/20/09
07/18/09
(Also: Fascination With Werewolves = Dude, THRILLER! You know I'm right.)
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/19/09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZwM3GvaTRM
07/19/09
07/18/09
Not a surprise, really. The Bible itself, with its undead messiah and all, pioneered the genre of Christian zombie fic.
07/19/09
"Jesus rose from the dead."
"So Jesus was the first vampire?" Thank you, Jason Stackhouse.
"Jesus is the only person that should rise from the dead."
"Actually, Jesus made Lazarus rise from the dead..."
I think that this is both hilarious and heartily mocks people who hypocritically use the bible. Don't eat shell fish.
07/18/09
07/18/09
07/18/09
I guess people nowadays will read any crap.
07/18/09
I guess I think this is a good thing for Christian culture, though a bad thing for vampire culture.
07/18/09
Tremendous!
07/18/09
07/19/09