ohh!!! "Call Girl" about a sweet country girl who was a big deal in her home town for her hog calling skillz who moves to the big city and trys to find a job that she can adapt her unique gifts to.
Um, is it wrong that I have absolutely no problem with this title? Hasn't the word "bitch" already been reclaimed by us feminist types? I'll wait and see the show before judging. But trying to cast this as a sign that Fox hates women is a very knee-jerk reaction for a website named "Jezebel."
I, and anyone else who has watched at least 2 movies ever, predict the first storyline: One of our bitch quartet is in love, but she's afraid to let the man know who she really is.
I suppose it's too much to hope for that it will be as clever as Ginger Snaps.
@Your Screenplay Sucks: Also, what's interesting about using werewolves (flowing body hair, grotesque transformations from human to beast, excessive slobber) rather than, say, vampires or witches is that werewolves are not sexy and perhaps the opposite of the female beauty ideal. We also know that it is against Fox policy to feature unsexy women as TV leads.
@Your Screenplay Sucks: I was thinking the same thing re: werewolves being uglier than other "dark creatures." I wonder if Fox will attempt to sexify the female werewolf?!
I can't imagine this show will take itself too seriously. And I will cling to that thought in order to live in my optimistic little world where TV executives aren't women-hating jerks. Lalala.
It's not enough that I have to completely lock down my TV after 6 pm so my kids can't see anything inappropriate that slips through the ratings lock ("unrated" Girls Next Door, I'm looking at you!). Now we get to have teh swearing right in the TV guide titles?
Thank you Fox, on behalf of the children of America.
@umamimama: Soon people like my aunt and uncle will be considered normal: our tv might has well have been locked on PBS, my aunt was so fed up with trying to figure this stuff out.
As someone named Twat, I can't really have a problem with the show's name, and I don't. Now why would a site named Jezebel have a problem with it? The word Jezebel has been used to insult women since before the English language was invented! If one can be reclaimed, why not the other?
Kinda thought the same thing. Especially since it's not just about high powered ladies - it's about high powered ladies who actually turn into dogs at night.
@Kilotwat: Well, let's put a swatiska on the bible and see if it can be reclaimed. Some things are beyond hope. (To cue you in, the swatiska does not have a 'bad' meaning, it simple has a bad connotation, like that of "bitch".)
@Kilotwat: I'm thinking it's kinda like the N-word -- As women, we can call ourselves bitches, but a bunch of (presumably male) TV execs better not use that word!
I dunno. I don't have a problem with the title as much as the entire premise for the show, which sounds ridiculous.
@TheGirlWithTheGoldenEyes: And with Miles Davis' "Bitch's Brew" a classic album, Elton John's "The Bitch is Back" as a golden oldie, and Meredith Brooks' "Bitch" fast approaching that status, is bitch even that shocking a word? As a Twat, I totally make fun of Bitch at the Convention of Offensive Words, "ha ha, you're on adult contemporary stations!"
@Cole23: The original Jezebel wound up being eaten by, well, bitches. That was how contemptible she was. The word Jezebel has been used as an insult by far more cultures and for a far longer time than the word bitch.
On the other hand, the Swastika has been used as a symbol of good luck and blessing for most of its existence by quite a few civilizations. If anything, it was Hitler who claimed the Swastika and changed its connotations in some cultures.
Symbols and words are fluid in meaning. And once a word, like bitch, gets used on easy listening stations, I have a hard time taking it seriously as a slur.
@Kilotwat: I agree. I guess maybe it's because bitch sounds...harsher? To some people. I'd personally prefer being called a bitch over a jezebel, though.
@: Kinda rude way of insinuating someone doesn't already know about swastikas and their origins. And kind of a bad example since the Nazi swastika isn't the same as a good luck swastika.
@Kivrin: I thought it was going to be a rip off of Bear City (Bear! Bear City!) I don't even like that sketch. But I look forward to Joel McHale skewering this.
12/23/08
So you cancel Arrested Development but this sounds like a super idea?
Fuck you too.
love,
laurasaurus
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
I suppose it's too much to hope for that it will be as clever as Ginger Snaps.
12/23/08
How, oh how, will this conundrum be resolved?
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
Ex:
Anything is possible.
Also that commercial TERRIFIES me.
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
Thank you Fox, on behalf of the children of America.
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
Kinda thought the same thing. Especially since it's not just about high powered ladies - it's about high powered ladies who actually turn into dogs at night.
12/23/08
12/23/08
I dunno. I don't have a problem with the title as much as the entire premise for the show, which sounds ridiculous.
12/23/08
12/23/08
On the other hand, the Swastika has been used as a symbol of good luck and blessing for most of its existence by quite a few civilizations. If anything, it was Hitler who claimed the Swastika and changed its connotations in some cultures.
Symbols and words are fluid in meaning. And once a word, like bitch, gets used on easy listening stations, I have a hard time taking it seriously as a slur.
12/23/08
12/23/08
@: Kinda rude way of insinuating someone doesn't already know about swastikas and their origins. And kind of a bad example since the Nazi swastika isn't the same as a good luck swastika.
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08