Bikes - Jezebel

posts about #bikes more →
Vogue's Eco Economics
Oh, The Womanity
Women Avoid Cycling Due To "Helmet Hair" • Ex-Mormon Gives $1M To Support Gay Marriage
Miley Cyrus & Her Dad Are On A Roll
Patriotic Nudists
Hey Ladies, Let's Talk About Our Cycles

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

hfree
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
This doesn't bug me because the last page of this magazine is always used to show off some rediculously priced item. This is no worse than showing a pair of shoes for the same price (or higher). I always think of the last page as a bit of Vogue satire. In fact, if A Dubs want that $25,000 sparkly dress so bad, she should put it on the last page and not feel bad about it.
Reply

hfree was starred hfree was unstarred

katie.scarlett.o'hara
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
Also? Their new "Steal of the Month" thing? It's one page where each item is less than $500. Really, what a bargain.
Reply

SomeAuthorGirl
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
I was only just saying to myself how useful an unwieldy, decorative mini steamer trunk would be. And lo! this one is detatchable, which makes it so easy to lug around! Where is my checkbook?!
Reply

SomeAuthorGirl was starred SomeAuthorGirl was unstarred

vamusical
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
I want to know how much waste is produced creating "green" products. Hey consumers, wanna be eco-friendly? Reuse something you already own. The carbon footprint will be ZERO!
Reply

vamusical was starred vamusical was unstarred

kapoosta
06/12/09

@vamusical: Yup. In many cases, it's actually better for the environment if you just throw something away rather than recycling it because of all the energy it takes to go through the recycling process. Recycling =/= reusing.
Reply

kapoosta was starred kapoosta was unstarred

nessalicious
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
You know what this kind of shit pisses me off so bad. I ride a bike and it's one of the few things I'm evangelical about.

It is a cost effective solution to spending almost £100 on public transport a month to get to work and it's making my body healthier. However bikes like this mean that 'normal' bike manufacturers think it's ok to charge £250+ for a basic bike. It took MONTHS to find something that wasn't made entirely of rusty tin to ride to work on, and what I bought has had to have around £80 spent on it in repairs in the last few months, not to mention the 7 punctures I've had to fix.

If people want us to stop using cars and public transport they should stop encouraging ridiculous things like stupid ugly Fendi bikes and baskets and build proper safe non-pot hole filled cycle lanes while they're at it. And get cab drivers and bus drivers to not drive insanely and shout at me.

/end rant
Reply

nessalicious was starred nessalicious was unstarred

gangey
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
Ugh. If I'm spending nearly six grand on bikes I'll take a top of the line full suspension mountain bike AND a top of the line ultralight roadbike, please.
Reply

gangey was starred gangey was unstarred

slowpoke.r
06/12/09

@gangey: Where do you live that you could get two top-of-the-line bikes for under 6K? My decent Italian road bike and decent Trek mt. bike cost about 4K combined, and both frames were used and my partner is a pro who gets deep discounts on all components.

Maybe our definitions of top of the line are different, though.
Reply

slowpoke.r was starred slowpoke.r was unstarred

gangey
06/12/09

@slowpoke.r: I live in a tiny podunk town in Utah, and the best bikes at our local bike shop run around $2500-$3000. I know that super fancy ones cost way more, but in my world a $3000 bike is crazy nice. My hardtail was $500 and does the job great (though I'm an intermediate mtn biker at best).

But yeah, you are right. Bikes can get way more expensive than that!
Reply

gangey was starred gangey was unstarred

SpasticFurchild
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
I want to know how much Cameron's outfit costs.
Reply

SpasticFurchild was starred SpasticFurchild was unstarred

Dodai
06/12/09

@SpasticFurchild: blouse $695, Stella McCartney. Pants, $240; bracelets, $160 each; cow leather belt $235.
Reply

Dodai was starred Dodai was unstarred

lucystrawberry: Tier 2 is the new black
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
Whatever. I want Vogue to feature things I will never be able to afford. It's fantasy. I like looking at pretty things.
Reply

morninggloria
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
That bike comes with an attached treasure chest. It must be for pirates only.
Reply

morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred

BrutallyHonestBabes (aka Mrs. Sarah.of.a.Lesser.Hobbit)
06/12/09

@morninggloria: Yeah, but cycling with an eye patch and peg leg can lead to some bad collisions, yar.
Reply

morninggloria
06/12/09

@BrutallyHonestBabes (aka Mrs. Sarah.of.a.Lesser.Hobbit): You must need to buy a special pedal for a peg leg. And a hook adaptable handlebar.

Those extras is where they really pillage ye.
Reply

morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred

kapoosta
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
Who has $5,900 to risk buying something that is so easy to steal?
Reply

kapoosta was starred kapoosta was unstarred

morninggloria
06/12/09

@kapoosta: That's exactly why I refused to spend more than $100 on my bike.

I also got a word bike lock and made "TURD" the combination. Anyone clever and hilarious enough to guess that "TURD" is my combo deserves a new bike for free. Here, take mine.
Reply

morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred

KittyKittyCat
06/12/09

@kapoosta: I personally keep my $1300 bike inside at all times. Plus it is insured. People who are serious about their bikes don't leave them out in the elements.
Reply

KittyKittyCat was starred KittyKittyCat was unstarred

slowpoke.r
06/12/09

@kapoosta: Serious cyclists. Road bikes can cost tens of thousands of dollars when you include wheels, components, etc. Though I doubt a serious cyclist would be interested in buying that particular bike.
Reply

slowpoke.r was starred slowpoke.r was unstarred

kapoosta
06/12/09

@slowpoke.r: Exactly. What would you be doing with a beautiful pirate chest bike as a serious cyclist? @morninggloria: hmmm...good to know. Where do you live?
Reply

kapoosta was starred kapoosta was unstarred

morninggloria
06/12/09

@kapoosta: Your mom's house.
Reply

morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred

slowpoke.r
06/12/09

@kapoosta: It's like when Design Within Reach came out with a skateboard. The deck had some super special graphics by some designer (which would end up covered anyway) and the thing cost like $600. So silly; who is the target audience for this stuff???
Reply

slowpoke.r was starred slowpoke.r was unstarred

kapoosta
06/12/09

@slowpoke.r: I see things like this as sculptures. They are beautiful, unusable, and rich people can afford them. Often, shoes fall into this category as well.
Reply

kapoosta was starred kapoosta was unstarred

chancentrate
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
Not gonna lie though, that 'basket' is sick. I would LOVE that on my bike. Even though I imagine it ways about 10 pounds meaning my already heavy cruiser would become practically immobile...But it would look great!
Reply

chancentrate was starred chancentrate was unstarred

bangers
06/12/09

@chancentrate: exactly what i was thinking! my little wirey basket already weighs my cruiser down about ten pounds...that basket would tip me over, i image. though it is beautiful.
Reply

bangers was starred bangers was unstarred

andBegorrah
06/12/09

In reply to Vogue's Eco Economics
That's okay. Fat-bottomed girls want nothing to do with Vogue either.
Reply

andBegorrah was starred andBegorrah was unstarred

ImproperDancing
06/08/09

In reply to Oh, The Womanity
Promo girls saved my life once.

I was at a bar for my friend's 21st when some drunk motherfucker PUKED on my shoulder.

Jameson girls gave me a t-shirt.

I <3 you Jameson girls!
Reply

ImproperDancing was starred ImproperDancing was unstarred

tscheese
06/08/09

In reply to Oh, The Womanity
If it wasn't bad enough that the patriarchy already runs everything, they also get an Isle named after them? DAMNIT.
Reply

tscheese was starred tscheese was unstarred

ellaesther
06/08/09

@tscheese: And the cats! Oh, no wait, those are Manx.
Reply

ellaesther was starred ellaesther was unstarred

That-Dude
06/08/09

In reply to Oh, The Womanity
Not sure of the outrage here -- most people are "visual creatures" and most of those people like pleasant sights. Now, if its an argument on types of beauty, I can understand that, but as long as humans are concerned with aesthetics, promo girls and Matthew McConaughey will stay employed (and probably both groups will remain topless, yes MM is a group all to himself).
Reply

That-Dude was starred That-Dude was unstarred

DangerMouse
06/08/09

@That-Dude: You're kidding, right?

1. Objectification of women. Seriously, COMPLETE objectification. They stand there like objects with bare midriffs. They appear to serve no other purpose.

2. Why is this necessary for a motorbike race?

I don't see shirtless men schilling things all over the place to appeal to my "visual creature"ness. Sorry. I'll let you know first when I start seeing scantily clad "Bud Light" GUYS at the bars instead of women.
Reply

DangerMouse was starred DangerMouse was unstarred

Evie Havok
06/08/09

@DangerMouse: They're willing participants in the "objectification." So, I don't really see the problem as long as they get paid to do what they were hired for.
Reply

Evie Havok was starred Evie Havok was unstarred

Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment