I love how a thread about acceptance of fat people and ending discrimination is 50% discussion of how fat people make flying so uncomfortable for everyone else. Seriously, why does every thread about fatness devolve into that topic? Are people really that traumatized by their flight experiences?
@thesciencegirl: True. I commented on the first one I saw, and then scrolled down and saw that several commenters had also complained about fat people on planes. Weird.
@NellMood: Yes, because if we're not allowed to say that fat people gross us out, we need to complain about how they inconvenience us! It's buses! And planes! And healthcare costs! But we're still really committed to Fat Acceptance. We just don't accept your fatness when you're sitting next to us.
what i find most irritating about the calories in/ calories out weight debate is that the argument becomes
3500 calories is a pound, no matter how you slice it, just don't eat as much
vs.
i eat (x) per day and work out (x) per day and i'm overweight so then what???
i hate it because it means that people are cars and weight exists in a vacuum. bring up correlations with poverty, and the argument is well, you can buy (x) food for (x) dollars and that's cheaper than mcdonalds. mention emotional correlates of eating and its well, sorry for you, but you're still eating over 2000 calories a day and i've had trauma and i deal with it.
on these threads, it's easy to talk about moderation and balance and if it were as easy as it is for you, you don't think everyone would be into it? an easy example is ADHD - the dopamine in your system is low and food cravings can be unbelievable. or what if when you were little, whenever you were sad mom didn't know how to talk to you and the only way to quiet the emotions was food? or what if, god forbid, you have a busy, active life and you get pleasure from a mcchicken?
i hate the moral garbage about your taxpayers money paying for fat people's health. do we yell at people who hate math to take math so they can become engineers and improve society? do we freak out when people do high level athletics and then we have to pay for their injuries? or when people don't have time to go to the family doc and the blood in their stool is colon cancer and you have to pay for chemo and not just surgery?
I like the Health At Every Size movement (HAES) but I have a problem with some aspects of the FA movement. The thing is, body size can be changed for some people. Even if someone is sickly, has disordered eating, nearly kills themselves, they will know for however long they can do that what it is to not be fat. To not be "other"ed. There is no measure I can go to to become straight, to become white. I understand that some people feel their body size is inalienable to their identities and identify as fat as I do black, but that difference in permanence makes me waffle on the FA movement. I also take offense to the charges of this being the last bastion of acceptable prejudice. I know the article isn't implying that, but it is something that some big name FA people like to say. I like that there is more publicity for any marginalized group but honestly don't know if I'll ever feel completely in line with FA.
@Chivone: I think there is another sticking point that just undermines the ability for FA to be accepted/successful. The dubious notion that there is no correlation between obesity and health problems. It's always countered with "You can be a healthy overweight person, and you can be an unhealthy thin person though! Q.E.D." Of course. The same way a lot of smokers don't get cancer and some non-smokers do. But, on the whole, without casting any angry aspersions towards smokers, the data reveal that there IS a correlation. To ignore that with anecdotal evidence to the contrary is ridiculous.
@schweppes: I agree, and appoint you my further answerer for this post today. (Sorry, not so much as a name plaque w/the job.) This is what I've been trying to put my finger on, but in a sufficiently gentle way.
The thing about being overweight is that it gets to be this terrible cycle of self-hate and more fat.
I honestly can't think of any physical activity that I have EVER found "fun". I hate hiking, I hate swimming, I hate getting on a bike. I want to like these things. If I had fun at them, maybe I wouldn't be so fucking fat.
But I am fucking fat, and I hate being fucking fat, and being fucking fat makes exercise even less fun, so I don't do it at all.
World: we know we're fat. We don't need you staring. We don't need your comments. We don't need your snickers. And you know what? Even if we AREN'T healthy - and some fat people are - we STILL deserve respect. That's basic human decency.
why can't we just accept people for who they are and stop passing judgment? with acceptance and understanding come compassion and kindness.
/Buddhist ideals
OK, referencing my comment below (that FA is the bomb, unless it involves southern states, in which case they need to lay off the chicken and sweet tea after church), and also this Jezebel post Increased Growth In The Bible Belt aren't we here at Jezebel a pretty good example of why FA isn't gaining much ground? (No pun intended.) Also, look at the tags on that post versus the tags on this post.
What if both "sides" accepted that there is a middle ground. Because as it stands, we can't talk about any of it without a shitstorm ensuing. (peers downthread) It's like you can only pick black or white, and to wander into the gray territory puts you smack-dab back into the HATERS! camp.
But somewhere, there is a middle ground, right? I mean, most of us agree that type 2 diabetes isn't cool for anyone to get because of their diet, much less kids. (It's called type 2 because type 1 - aka Juvenile Onset Diabetes was pretty much unseen in older youth/young people, usually showing up in persons over 40 - source is the CDC.)
I'm pretty sure we can also agree that you can be "overweight" (whatever that is, these days) and be healthy.
But for either side to take an either/or-neithor/nor stance isn't helping anyone.
@labeled: Smartest thing I've heard all day. You SHOULD be able to say that society should make a concerted effort to lower the incidence of obesity in this country without it being construed as "So, you want to get rid of me and other people like me because you hate me?" You shouldn't, though, be able to speak to (or about) an individual who is overweight in a hateful, rude way. HOWEVER, a lot of times, people are very sensitive because when you talk about "obesity" as a problem that needs to be solved, they automatically take it as a personal attack, which it isn't.
@schweppes: Agreed. I think it's because our society is so fat phobic at this point, it's difficult for people who aren't thin to not feel attacked. Because they generally are, all the time. And the distinction is rarely made.
It's absolutely okay to say, we should make access to healthy foods and exercise easier for everyone, and lower the risks of diabetes and heart disease. And that if you personally are having health problems related to weight, there are probably steps that can be taken to reduce them.
Unfortunately, a lot of people approach this issue with a "thin is healthy" mentality because it's so much simpler than realized that it's individual. It's why the diet industry is so successful, but ultimately harmful and ineffective.
@labeled: I hear you, but I think the problem is this: what solutions are you offering in this land of compromise with your "reasonable middle way" that is different from the diet culture side? Do you really know a fat acceptance person who doesn't want poor kids to get fresh fruit or more open space to play?
What exactly do you think we should be doing that Fat Acceptance types are preventing? Could you accept it if we wiped out Type II diabetes and increased average activity but nobody got that much thinner?
Collective action is needed: we deserve better access to quality food, the time to make it, and the ability to shop for it without being trapped in a car, no matter what our race and class. We deserve full access to low-cost single-payer health care. I am on-board with all of those things. But I don't care if obesity rates do not decrease significantly because of them. I want less type II diabetes, but I don't think weight loss is going to lead to less type II diabetes or heart disease. I think more exercise would make us all healthier, but I don't expect the world to lose twenty pounds each when we reached the promised land and walk, bike, and take the bus 80% of the time in mixed-use walkable urban developments.
I am okay with that. Are the reasonable compromisers okay with that?
@jeninmotion:After giving this a lot of thought today, here's what I'm offering - I've already offered it: Be polite, society.
My body is not yours to comment upon. Period. I'll give you the exact same respect. Extend to my family, thanks.
Same goes for:
My choice to go on or off of Atkins, whether you think I'm fat or not, or it's healthy or not.
My choice to eat nachos at a ballgame. (And hot dogs. And beer. And everything else.)
Here it gets tricky. By and large, I really don't care about you, much. In an abstract way, yes, but the general "you"... yeah, I've got my own problems, which include my own health, budget, family. I'm a nice woman, but I'm at a breaking point for being mind-fucked everytime someone gets a bee in their bonnet and wants me to UNDERSTAND where they're coming from.
The FA movement and ED-culture both fall into this category - please quit acting as if my right to exist depends entirely upon understanding your right to be accepted as a fat or Healthy with a capital H. Because not only do I accept you as you are, I just... don't care all that much. That isn't said in a bitchy way, apathy would be closer to it.
I'm not saying any of this in a don't ask/don't tell kind of way, either - I'm just saying... please quit yelling at the world and say thank you, excuse me, and pardon me a little more.
Then we can probably just, yk, talk about issues that affect us all. Like healthcare, or access to affordable healthy foods, or access to a school lunch program that doesn't put our kids at risk for type 2 diabetes by the time they're 10.
I have absolutely no interest in policing other peoples' bodies and judging their food choices/lifestyles/weight/whatever. It's not my business and I probably don't give enough consideration to what I put in my body to warrant telling other people they should "eat healthy." The only time I'd worry about someone's eating habits is if they appeared to have an ED. Basically, I'm pro acceptance of fat people, skinny people, people in general.
That said, I appreciate the rule that airlines have passed on having obese people buy 2 tickets. It's better for everyone if people can fit into their seats comfortably.
@EarlyGrey: If it's better for everyone that people can fit into their seats comfortably, then maybe you should call out the airlines for their increasingly cramped seating. It's hard to fly comfortably not only for fat people but tall people, and many others. I don't know anyone who can afford to buy two tickets on a plane, but sometimes you have to fly somewhere. It's a shitty policy.
@EarlyGrey: I'm ready for airlines to pass a policy requiring that guys who spread their legs as far apart as possible must buy two tickets. I don't want your knee crossing the line into my space.
Airplanes are uncomfortable for almost everyone. The rule that obese people must buy two tickets seems unnecessarily discriminatory when people of all shapes and sizes routinely invade everyone else's space.
@NellMood: I don't think the rule is applied arbitrarily, though, is it? I think there are cases when it goes beyond "invading space" and people are actually 2 seats wide. If you are the size of 2 seats, it would actually be impossible to fit into one. It doesn't seem fair to be given an extra seat for free if you require one in order to fit on a plane.
@EarlyGrey: Maybe someone who has had personal experience with this can step in and comment, because I really don't know how the rule is applied.
I've sat next to extremely tall people who spread their legs all the way into my space- why shouldn't they have to get two seats? What about people who take the arm rest and cross over into your space with their elbows? Should they pay for 1/4 of your seat? I just don't understand why obese people are singled out.
@precipice: People are getting larger and taller, and they make the seats smaller and smaller -- something's gottta give! Please, cram less seats into a plane. I'm sick and tired of leg cramp and possible danger of deep vein trombosis.
And NellMood, I got into a fight last year with a guy because he kept crowding my space -- I was using half of my seat, and he was using the other half (not because he was large but because he was a man and needs to air his balls or sth). It took me 5 hours to muster up the courage to ask him nicely to keep his arms and legs to himself. And then of course he started to yell at ME.
@EarlyGrey: I honestly hope you never have to learn first-hand how painful it is to fly when you're fat. Not only are people staring and actually talking about you when you can hear them, but you might be embarrassed in front of a hundred people when the flight attendant tells you to buy another seat because the thinner person next to you complains that your "disgusting fat" is overflowing into their seat. You might never fly again. Especially if you'd have to pay for two seats that the airline should really have made more comfortable in general.
@EarlyGrey: Here's the problem with the policy, though: It is arbitrary, the person at the ticket counter decides as you walk up to check in. Also, it doesn't mean you get an extra seat, it means you PAY for an extra seat. I read an article about this where an overweight man was told he had to buy the extra seat, but then still had to sit in a full row because the plane was full. Not only did he have to pay double at the every last minute because, again it was the check in agent who enforced this as he arrived at the airport, but he didn't even get to use the "extra" seat he paid for. It isn't about comfort, it's about money.
@precipice: That sounds horrible and as I said, I don't know how this rule is applied. I assumed that it was only used in cases when a person would actually have to be moved from a seat in order to accommodate the larger person. Discomfort is a fact of traveling, and if airlines are making people buy an extra seat just because the person next to them is uncomfortable, that's another thing altogether and I don't think it's right. I was working under the assumption that the rule was only applied when someone required 2 empty seats.
@NellMood: I'm going to see if I can find it, I honestly don't remember, it was a wile ago when the policy was first announced. I'm going to test my Google-fu though and see if I can dig it up.
My mother and I had a huge fight about this yesterday. She HATES fat people. Hates them. Makes fun of a every fat person she sees, and claims it's fine because she's not doing it to his or her face.
In fairness to her, her mother was obese for 40 years, never did anything but complain about it, and died from medical issues that her doctor said were a direct result of obesity. Her sister seems to be going the same way. So I do understand that those situations are horribly frustrating for her.
But she just doesn't believe fat or obesity can be caused by anything other than overeating. I told her you can't know how healthy someone is by looking at them, but she claims all fat people are horribly unhealthy. I said fine, why do you care? Because "we're paying for it", which just lead to a whole other argument about universal health care (we're Canadian).
But it was just for frustrating and hurtful to me. I had a friend in high school who ran, danced, and was on a strict diet planned out by her doctor, and I used to find her crying because she didn't know why she was still so fat. I told this to my mother, in an attempt to argue that no, it's not "as simple as burning more than you take in". Her response? "Maybe she ate healthy around you, but at home she was stuffing her face with doughnuts while complaining about being fat."
This came out much longer than intended...sorry! But I just don't understand why some people care so much about what other people look like. I hate going for a drive with my mom and hearing her bully every fat person she sees, even if it isn't to their face...
@memphreblues: I think "fat phobia" is probably caused by a few things. Our media has over-hyped this issue, and terms like "obesity epidemic" don't help, since they equate body fat with some kind of plague.
The other is that, unlike a lot of other forms of discrimination, because this one is viewed as a "choice" (unlike being born black or a woman etc) people feel they have permission to discriminate and harangue. Because this is something they believe the person can/should change, or that it's an indicator of character, will power, gluttony, etc. It isn't, obviously, but people really like to judge others because it usually makes them feel superior.
@tiredfairy: That's definitely a big part of it. My mom is a health nut, and she loves being able to say, "Ugh, how can that person be so fat? I work out X hours a week and look great! What's wrong with them?" It's as if other people being fat makes her skinnier in some way.
@memphreblues: She sounds really invested in the health and appearance of others. Which seems to be a relatively common problem for a lot of folks. It becomes a character issue for them, a way to feel safe in judging. And it says way more about the person juding on appearance than the one who isn't.
I'm really torn on this one. I'm generally a live and let live kind of guy. Still, it is pretty obvious that other people's choices can and do effect all of us. You have no right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater, and your right to swing your fists freely ends at the tip of my nose. But does your right to be obese end when you try to ease your bulk into the pathetically narrow (thanks airline industry!) seat next to me on the red-eye to NYC? That's a much tougher one.
Is being obese a choice? I don't know, but I suspect most obese people would choose another body type if the whole choosing thing was really a viable option. This discussion probably leads back to the whole nature vs. nurture line of inquiry.
Are you really making an analogy between being obese and violence?
It's kind of amazing to me that you would question whether someone has a "right" to take up space. I mean, what are you going to do? Pass a law where people can't get beyond a certain size, and if they do, they mus immediately cease to exist?
@cocktail bun: With all due respect, you'll have to help me understand your logic on that one. If somebody pays full freight for a full seat on an airline, why should they be expected or forced to share a portion of that seat with somebody who is obese? Shouldn't the person who is obese be the one buying 2 seats, if, in fact, they take up more than one seat?
@alaskanbrownbear: If "most obese people would choose another body type if the whole choosing thing was really a viable option," that desire is highly shaped by exclusionary and inherently shaming aspects of the culture around us, not just in the rhetoric and pop culture (mis)representations, but in the difficulty finding fashionable, affordable clothing that fits well, the discomfort of airplane seats and desk chairs and a variety of other quotidian pieces of material culture that are built without the vast variety of body shapes in mind, and so on. No one is born with an instinctual assumption about what physical size is most desirable - that's a social construct.
@alaskanbrownbear:
But in this case, it's a matter of possibly effecting your comfort level in an already uncomfortable space. That's not the same as infringing on, say, any of your actual rights as a person. Sure, I don't like being crowded on a plane or subway...but that happens regardless of anyone's size.
Meanwhile, fat discrimination limits people's life choices like getting work or being promoted, and has led to all kinds of other issues that don't help anything. To me, that's way more serious than whether I'm comfortable in an airline seat.
@alaskanbrownbear: I think the meat of your argument lies in the questions of whether or not someone has the "right to be obese"
Yelling "fire" in a crowded theater and swinging your fists at someone's face is action. Being obese is a state. As soon as we start taking away the rights of citizens to exist in a natural state (and yes, I do consider obesity to be natural) than what is to stop us from denying people the right to be blonde, or tall or ....
@NellMood: I'm the first to admit I don't have all the answers on this issue. I think it's more complicated and nuanced than simply saying somebody chooses to be obese or not. See andBegorrah's interesting comment above, for instance.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: I also think it should be said that those actions are actions with the intent to hurt others. Someone else's body type does not harm me. Someone touching me on an airplane does not harm me; someone trying to cause a riot in my movie theater or hit me in the face does. I really don't get the comparison.
@NellMood: I think what alaskanbrownbear is getting at is that there is a genetic component to obesity, but there are actions people take to make it worse. Some people are just naturally larger than others and it's a situation that they can do little to control. People who are genetically pre-disposed to being larger will likely never be rail thin. In that sense, it's not a choice. But there are actions, such as choosing to eat at McDonalds with frequency as opposed to hitting the gym, that might exacerbate a natural condition. In that sense, it is a choice. I'm all for a healthy body at any size, so long as the person is actually healthy. That's what we all should strive for, regardless of size.
While I'm very lucky to have skinny genes, I am unlucky enough to have the dreaded acne gene. Acne isn't a choice for me (or anyone, lord knows) but there are things that I could do (not wash my face for days, sleep in heavy makeup) that would cause my acne to get significantly worse.
I do not, however, think that society needs to grant anyone the "right" to be fat, alaskanbrownbear. An obese person should not be forced to buy two tickets anywhere, just like society doesn't force me to put a paper bag on my head during a nasty hormonal breakout... it's just how it goes.
Why does it matter if someone else's lifestyle is unhealthy? Why should you care? Someone in a wheelchair never has to apologize and say 'oh sorry, I was born this way; I swear I never attempted any dangerous activities that paralyzed me or anything.'
If I were several hundred pounds, did nothing but sit on the couch all day like a caricature of what people think fat people do, and I only moved to hooveround to the kitchen to get more over processed junk food, then so what? Why shouldn't I? If it is my body, then it is my choice, and no one else should shame me for the way I live my life.
Should the government and companies find more ways to make a healthy lifestyle more attainable? Absolutely. Should individuals be shamed for their bodies? Of course not.
I wish haters and critics would just take the time to listen to What activists like Marianne and Kate Harding have to say. When I first heard of the Fat/Size acceptance movement I though it was the most ridiculous thing ever. I am thin/average and the daughter of a Dietitian so I was basically brought up in the complete opposite school of thought, ie food & fat = EVIL! I began reading Shapely prose though and it completely changed my outlook on the movement. I think it's wonderful and I think there is so much people of all sizes can take away from it. Educating myself on the SA/FA movement has really changed the way I think about food and size and honestly has made me a happier, more satisfied person.
I'm a "live and let live" kinda gal in general. You do you, I do me, etc.
It's when the twain meet that gives me pause.
Travelling on a trans-Atlantic flight in coach class with a very very heavy man sitting next to me, and taking up a portion of my own seat was uncomfortable at first and then by hour 7 I was angry.
I don't agree that obese people should have to pay for two seats because that's discrimination, but just accepting that you're going to be cramped for many hours is not fair to anyone either.
That's really the airline's fault though. I am very petite, so am comfortable in airline seats. My boyfriend, who is average weight and tall, finds flying to be agony. They're just not made for normal people, because the airline wants to make a profit by fitting as many people on the plane as possible.
@SharonTaint: I hate flying already, but sitting next to someone who takes up half of my seat as well as his/her own is torture. If you're big enough to fit in two seats, buy two seats.
My mom and I are both average-sized women, and we fit quite comfortably in our seats (She was actually using part of mine thanks to the overweight man next to her).
I feel for people with long legs, but not for people who can make themselves/others around them more comfortably by buying two seats.
@precipice: By extension, those people who are obese and who cannot occupy just one BUS seat may very well be required to purchase two fares, if the logic follows.
@precipice: This is an issue of compassion. We make special accommodations for disabled people, regardless of how they became disabled- because as a society we have compassion for them.
For example, we don't tell somebody who is paraplegic as a result of their own drunk driving that they can't use handicapped parking spots.
I know. Obesity isn't usually considered a disability because it usually isn't a permanent condition like paralysis. Still a person who is temporarily disabled can apply for a temporary disabled placard.
I don't see why similar accommodations can't be made for very large people. Maybe it's the economics of it all, if there are more obese people that require two seats than disabled people. (I think that is the case, but I'd have to look it up to be sure.) But that is pretty cold, IMO.
We have a lot of overweight in this country, that's just a fact we have to deal with now. We aren't going to instantly fix the problem by making people pay for two seats, or shaming them in public. Any fixes are going to have to involve better healthcare and nutrition education...and it is going to take time.
@precipice: I like Southwest's system more than any other. If you can't fit in a seat, they ask you to buy two seats, but if the plane isn't full, they refund you for one.
When we buy plane tickets, we pay X for Y amount of space. Is it cheap for someone who will use more than Y to need to pay 2Y? No. But it's not fair for anyone else to pay full price and get half a seat because their neighbor is pressing them up against the window.
@SharonTaint: What you are saying is that, since I am fat (due to PCOS and not any "life choice" that I have conscientiously made) and since I can not afford to buy two seats I should not be able to visit other places on an airplane. BUT since you are thin, you should be able to. How is that fair in the slightest? How can you even say that with a straight face?
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: You know, a lot of people cannot fly because of medical conditions that cannot be accommodated by a commercial airline. No one has a constitutional right to fly. I'm not saying that I think the airline policies are right, but I don't think the "fairness" argument holds much water.
@schweppes: You are absolutely right. There is not "right" to fly. My "fairness" argument is in reponse to the idea that it is not "fair" to infringe on someone's space on an airline. You actually proved my point for me, so thanks!
@Peppermint: You are not paying for space, you are paying for passage. This is why a child has the pay the same amount as a grown up. This is why a tall man has to pay the same price as a short woman. The idea of paying for space means genetics would determine the price scheme and I think a lot of MEN (being that they are bigger) would have a problem with that.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Maybe. But, if I'm reading you correctly, you're saying that the fact that a person's medical condition might result in unfair things in the world, then other people shouldn't be able to complain when another person's medical condition treats them unfairly. That's a different issue. In general, an individual bears the "cost" of him or herself, medical conditions and all, but we're not compelled to bear the costs of their medical conditions.
@schweppes: Ex: In some states, an epileptic cannot drive legally. That's unfair, because of a medical condition they have no control over, they have less mobility. But, in those states where they can, if they have a seizure and crash their car into someone else, the person who bears the costs of that crash is the epileptic, even though it was due to a medical condition.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: But a child that is a "lap baby" does not pay full steerage, so to speak. Because they do not take up a seat.
Perhaps we should be pushing for larger seats for obese people?
Also, what is your solution? And haven't you been in the position of having to "give" part of your seat to a larger person? I'm a pretty friendly chick, really, but I do have my limits, and I just happen to fucking hate sharing skin-on-skin time with strangers.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: But you do pay for space. A coach seat is x size and y dollars. A first class seat is z size and q dollars. Or you pick an airline based on their seat sizes, as it varies, and pay whatever their price is
@schweppes: No, what I am saying is that "fairness" really has no point in the conversation at all. We make accommodation for disabilities all the time. I may not like the fact that the elderly, incapacitated and those with small children get to board an airplane before I do but I make an accommodation for them because I believe it is in the best interest of society to protect it's elderly, young and infirm. The original poster may not like the fact that I am fat and therefore must touch them when I sit in a seat next to them but it is no less fair that I am taking up a portion of their seat, than it is for them to require me to buy two seats due to a genetic condition. We are at an impasse.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Because I paid for a seat, and got only half. Because the man next to me paid for a seat and got a seat and a half.
And I could turn it around and ask where the fairness in that is, but what's the point?
@schweppes: This anology really does not have any bearing on situation the OP is discussing. Any party that drives and carries insurance (healthy or not) agrees to obey the laws of the road. They agree that should they be unable to drive safely (for whatever reason) and they cause damage, they will be responsible for it.
At no point do passengers agree before they board an airplane, that they will not infringe or otherwise impose on their fellow passengers. If this were the case no one with heavy perfume, a loud voice, or a child would be able to fly.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: But they DO agree to comply with airline policies and procedures. which may or may not being required to buy a second seat
@labeled: My solution is to make obesity a disability. The airlines would be lawfully required to accommodate those people who are too large to fit into a standard airline seat, at no expense to the passenger, just like they are obligated to accommodate those who are in a wheelchair or those who can't hear.
Yes, the extremely young are not required to pay for a seat not because they are not using the seat, but because they are not inccuring any of the additional costs associated with passage (i.e. they do not have luggage, do not need to be scanned at security, do not require a ticket, ect.) They also don't have the safety devices that a given to paying passengers. Taking a lap child is more akin to an extra piece of baggage.
@colormeroutine: Except it is a well known fact that couch seat sizes vary depending on where in the plane they are located. I can pay the same coach fare as you get an extra inch of room if I sit in the first row of seats. I can get an extra 2 inches if I sit in a safety row. When you pay coach you are getting a standard passage including safety precautions, food and drink and use of the facilities. If you were just paying for space you would not get any of these things.
When you pay for 1st class you are getting an upgraded passage. This does include larger seats, but it also includes better food, faster check-in and a more attentive staff (among other things)
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: But how can you simultaneously argue, as the FA movement usually does, that being overweight is not detrimental to your health, while also saying it's a disability?
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Not true. Airlines lately have been charging extra for the seats by the emergency exits that have extra leg room
@colormeroutine: Some airlines have been charging extra, but not all. And should those seats not be sold they do sell them at the normal seat price, which means my argument is still true.
@colormeroutine: ADD is not detrimental to your health. Neither is being blind. It does however require different accommodations in order to insure that a blind person or one with ADD has the ability to enjoy the same experience that a a person without a disability can get. Whether or not I believe being overweight to be a health risk, it doesn't change the fact that being extremely obese requires certain accommodations in order to be comfortable.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: If the only reason an epileptic is responsible for a car accident is because of a "contract" to drive safely, a person makes is subject to the same agreement when they choose to buy a single seat.
@schweppes: No, purchasing PASSAGE on an airline does not subject me to an agreement to only take up X amount of space. Again, many an average weight tall man or big boned woman would have an issue with that argument. Also, again, that has no relevance to whether or not an epeleptic person is responsible for damages caused while suffering a seizure when driving. I am not causing any damages when riding in an airplane while being fat.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: You are buying a seat. You are not buying "passage." You get a seat number on your ticket. It's not some conceptual ticket or seat. The "damages" are you are causing are for exceeding the bounds of the space you purchased to the discomfort of others.
@schweppes: You buy passage on an airline, Schweppes. If you were buying a specific seat then you wouldn't be able to be bumped from a plane for overcrowding. This is why you aren't given a seat number when you purchase the ticket, only when you get your boarding pass.
I'm damaging someone because I am making them uncomfortable? I'm sorry but legally that doesn't hold water. I can't sue for damages because you made me feel uncomfortable.
Bottom line is that airlines do not currently run on the "you purchase space" system. If they did than a 100lb woman would pay less than a 225lb linebacker and a 6 year old would pay less than a 40 year old. You can't hold me to a rule that no one else is being held too.
Edited by Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny. at 07/31/09 4:46 PM
Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny. was starred
Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny. was unstarred
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Airlines run on a purchase of a seat, Vive. Whether the 225lb linebacker OR a 3 yo toddler is sitting in it. No matter how many times you say that isn't so, it is.
And if someone does not fit into that seat, another seat may be purchased.
I'm not being shitty here, I'm just saying - no matter how many times you try to put it differently, that's how it goes. It's why lap babies aren't charged - because they are not taking up a seat. If you want to bring that same baby in a car seat, you must purchase an airline seat in which to place it.
What you are arguing is comfort - the linebacker is less comfortable in that seat than a toddler, which is a bummer, but it doesn't change how the seat was sold.
eta: :::passes stick back to Vive::: Commence with poking. (We both know better, why are we here again?)
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: You purchase a seat. It doesn't matter when you get the seat assignment, you get a seat. It's not a subway where you can just cram more people in (that's why you get bumped, because they ran out of seats). You buy seats. Period. The fact that a little kid pays as much as an adult is because they both fit in the seat. The seat that they bought. The same way you don't get a discount (on airlines that don't charge for the 1st bag) if you don't check luggage, or check a tiny piece of luggage, but you DO get charged if you have to check more luggage or very heavy luggage.
@labeled: So you "happen to fucking hate sharing skin-on-skin time with strangers." Perhaps, since you have this issue, you shouldn't fly. After all, it's not as though you have some right. Perhaps your bloated sense of personal space is a sort of disability? Can't you take a theater class and work off some of that excessive personal space or something? Instead of making it other people's problem?
@labeled: You are thinking about this much to concretely. When I go online and purchase an airplane ticket to Colorado Southwest is entering into a contract to fly me (and my luggage) to Colorado on their airplane. My fare purchases a seat, yes, but not just a seat. It also purchases amenities, safety protocol and staff to assist me with my needs and most importantly it purchases the promise that Southwest will transport me from point A to point B. Should Southwest decide that they want to take every single seat out of their airplanes and make each passenger stand for the duration of their flights, it wouldn't matter as long as they fulfilled their obligation to get me to Colorado. (which is why someone bumped from 1st class is eligible for a partial but not a full refund, the airline still fulfilled it's obligation of transportation)
If airlines truly charged for space (as you claim they do) than customers would know, when they bought the ticket, exactly how many square feet their dollar bought and how many square feet they were entitled to take up. A 6 year old would purchase less square feet than a 40 year old. Which is fine, if that's the way they are going to do it. This is not, however, the way airlines are currently run.
@Glaven: Well, telling me that is no different than telling someone to lose weight or stay home and deal with your issues. Er, not so nicely played. Really, what's different?
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: I know II already said this before, but apparently you didn't read it: the reason why a four year old and a 45 year old pay the same price is because they both fit into A seat. If someone didn't need a seat (lap baby) they wouldn't have to pay for a ticket, even though they also get amenities, safety protocol and staff. You pay for a seat. My WORD, you pay for a seat on an airline. Not that complicated.
@labeled: Look, I have made every effort to have an intelligent conversation with you on this point. I have done this because I respect you. I get that the concept I'm arguing may be difficult to grasp. I have tried very hard to respond to your argument with well thought out examples and reasoning. I get that you may have a different opinion than mine and I respect that. However, for you to respond to my opinion with are a reply that basically amounts to "You wish" is silly and frankly beneath you Labeled and it is pissing me off.
I am a lot of things but I do not fabricate ideas simply because they bolster my opinion. I truly believe that one pays for passage on an airplane. If you are going to attempt to disprove my point at least respond to the allegations instead of accusing me of blatant stupidity.
@schweppes: Actually, Schwepps, it is you who didn't read my comment. Lap babies do not get the same amenities, safety protocol and staff. Tey don't require a boarding pass, they don't get to bring luggage, they don't need to be scanned through security, they don't get an oxygen mask and they don't get a flotation device, among other things.
@Vivelafat says Sweep the leg, Johnny.: Yes they do! They get an oxygen mask, they get a flotation device. Absolutely. That's why more oxygen masks fall from the ceiling than there are seats and any flight with babies mention additional life vests available up front. You are incorrect, madam. If there were an emergency, a flight attendant would be bound by her job to help the infant too. They DO go through security, just as any other person. There is not a special bin to put a baby through unscreened. You are simply mistaken with this misguided notion of "passage"
Other people's bodies are none of your business. You don't ask why somebody got a clit piercing or dyed their hair blond. You don't ask people why or how they are fat or skinny. Taking care of yourself properly is a big enough job, and chances are you're not doing it right if you're overly concerned with everyone else's choices.
@BlondeGoddess: I don't know... I think it's a joke, you know, making light of a situation that involves hurtful discrimination. I don't think that kind of t-shirt is really at the root of the tools used by the fat acceptance community.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
Sigh.
07/31/09
08/01/09
07/31/09
3500 calories is a pound, no matter how you slice it, just don't eat as much
vs.
i eat (x) per day and work out (x) per day and i'm overweight so then what???
i hate it because it means that people are cars and weight exists in a vacuum. bring up correlations with poverty, and the argument is well, you can buy (x) food for (x) dollars and that's cheaper than mcdonalds. mention emotional correlates of eating and its well, sorry for you, but you're still eating over 2000 calories a day and i've had trauma and i deal with it.
on these threads, it's easy to talk about moderation and balance and if it were as easy as it is for you, you don't think everyone would be into it? an easy example is ADHD - the dopamine in your system is low and food cravings can be unbelievable. or what if when you were little, whenever you were sad mom didn't know how to talk to you and the only way to quiet the emotions was food? or what if, god forbid, you have a busy, active life and you get pleasure from a mcchicken?
i hate the moral garbage about your taxpayers money paying for fat people's health. do we yell at people who hate math to take math so they can become engineers and improve society? do we freak out when people do high level athletics and then we have to pay for their injuries? or when people don't have time to go to the family doc and the blood in their stool is colon cancer and you have to pay for chemo and not just surgery?
gah.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
I honestly can't think of any physical activity that I have EVER found "fun". I hate hiking, I hate swimming, I hate getting on a bike. I want to like these things. If I had fun at them, maybe I wouldn't be so fucking fat.
But I am fucking fat, and I hate being fucking fat, and being fucking fat makes exercise even less fun, so I don't do it at all.
World: we know we're fat. We don't need you staring. We don't need your comments. We don't need your snickers. And you know what? Even if we AREN'T healthy - and some fat people are - we STILL deserve respect. That's basic human decency.
07/31/09
/Buddhist ideals
07/31/09
07/31/09
What if both "sides" accepted that there is a middle ground. Because as it stands, we can't talk about any of it without a shitstorm ensuing. (peers downthread) It's like you can only pick black or white, and to wander into the gray territory puts you smack-dab back into the HATERS! camp.
But somewhere, there is a middle ground, right? I mean, most of us agree that type 2 diabetes isn't cool for anyone to get because of their diet, much less kids. (It's called type 2 because type 1 - aka Juvenile Onset Diabetes was pretty much unseen in older youth/young people, usually showing up in persons over 40 - source is the CDC.)
I'm pretty sure we can also agree that you can be "overweight" (whatever that is, these days) and be healthy.
But for either side to take an either/or-neithor/nor stance isn't helping anyone.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
It's absolutely okay to say, we should make access to healthy foods and exercise easier for everyone, and lower the risks of diabetes and heart disease. And that if you personally are having health problems related to weight, there are probably steps that can be taken to reduce them.
Unfortunately, a lot of people approach this issue with a "thin is healthy" mentality because it's so much simpler than realized that it's individual. It's why the diet industry is so successful, but ultimately harmful and ineffective.
07/31/09
What exactly do you think we should be doing that Fat Acceptance types are preventing? Could you accept it if we wiped out Type II diabetes and increased average activity but nobody got that much thinner?
Collective action is needed: we deserve better access to quality food, the time to make it, and the ability to shop for it without being trapped in a car, no matter what our race and class. We deserve full access to low-cost single-payer health care. I am on-board with all of those things. But I don't care if obesity rates do not decrease significantly because of them. I want less type II diabetes, but I don't think weight loss is going to lead to less type II diabetes or heart disease. I think more exercise would make us all healthier, but I don't expect the world to lose twenty pounds each when we reached the promised land and walk, bike, and take the bus 80% of the time in mixed-use walkable urban developments.
I am okay with that. Are the reasonable compromisers okay with that?
07/31/09
ETA: Interesting to note that you automatically assumed I was on the "diet culture" side. Why?
07/31/09
My body is not yours to comment upon. Period. I'll give you the exact same respect. Extend to my family, thanks.
Same goes for:
My choice to go on or off of Atkins, whether you think I'm fat or not, or it's healthy or not.
My choice to eat nachos at a ballgame. (And hot dogs. And beer. And everything else.)
Here it gets tricky. By and large, I really don't care about you, much. In an abstract way, yes, but the general "you"... yeah, I've got my own problems, which include my own health, budget, family. I'm a nice woman, but I'm at a breaking point for being mind-fucked everytime someone gets a bee in their bonnet and wants me to UNDERSTAND where they're coming from.
The FA movement and ED-culture both fall into this category - please quit acting as if my right to exist depends entirely upon understanding your right to be accepted as a fat or Healthy with a capital H. Because not only do I accept you as you are, I just... don't care all that much. That isn't said in a bitchy way, apathy would be closer to it.
I'm not saying any of this in a don't ask/don't tell kind of way, either - I'm just saying... please quit yelling at the world and say thank you, excuse me, and pardon me a little more.
Then we can probably just, yk, talk about issues that affect us all. Like healthcare, or access to affordable healthy foods, or access to a school lunch program that doesn't put our kids at risk for type 2 diabetes by the time they're 10.
07/31/09
That said, I appreciate the rule that airlines have passed on having obese people buy 2 tickets. It's better for everyone if people can fit into their seats comfortably.
07/31/09
07/31/09
Airplanes are uncomfortable for almost everyone. The rule that obese people must buy two tickets seems unnecessarily discriminatory when people of all shapes and sizes routinely invade everyone else's space.
07/31/09
07/31/09
I've sat next to extremely tall people who spread their legs all the way into my space- why shouldn't they have to get two seats? What about people who take the arm rest and cross over into your space with their elbows? Should they pay for 1/4 of your seat? I just don't understand why obese people are singled out.
07/31/09
And NellMood, I got into a fight last year with a guy because he kept crowding my space -- I was using half of my seat, and he was using the other half (not because he was large but because he was a man and needs to air his balls or sth). It took me 5 hours to muster up the courage to ask him nicely to keep his arms and legs to himself. And then of course he started to yell at ME.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
In fairness to her, her mother was obese for 40 years, never did anything but complain about it, and died from medical issues that her doctor said were a direct result of obesity. Her sister seems to be going the same way. So I do understand that those situations are horribly frustrating for her.
But she just doesn't believe fat or obesity can be caused by anything other than overeating. I told her you can't know how healthy someone is by looking at them, but she claims all fat people are horribly unhealthy. I said fine, why do you care? Because "we're paying for it", which just lead to a whole other argument about universal health care (we're Canadian).
But it was just for frustrating and hurtful to me. I had a friend in high school who ran, danced, and was on a strict diet planned out by her doctor, and I used to find her crying because she didn't know why she was still so fat. I told this to my mother, in an attempt to argue that no, it's not "as simple as burning more than you take in". Her response? "Maybe she ate healthy around you, but at home she was stuffing her face with doughnuts while complaining about being fat."
This came out much longer than intended...sorry! But I just don't understand why some people care so much about what other people look like. I hate going for a drive with my mom and hearing her bully every fat person she sees, even if it isn't to their face...
07/31/09
The other is that, unlike a lot of other forms of discrimination, because this one is viewed as a "choice" (unlike being born black or a woman etc) people feel they have permission to discriminate and harangue. Because this is something they believe the person can/should change, or that it's an indicator of character, will power, gluttony, etc. It isn't, obviously, but people really like to judge others because it usually makes them feel superior.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
Is being obese a choice? I don't know, but I suspect most obese people would choose another body type if the whole choosing thing was really a viable option. This discussion probably leads back to the whole nature vs. nurture line of inquiry.
07/31/09
Are you really making an analogy between being obese and violence?
It's kind of amazing to me that you would question whether someone has a "right" to take up space. I mean, what are you going to do? Pass a law where people can't get beyond a certain size, and if they do, they mus immediately cease to exist?
07/31/09
I know it sucks when someone spills into your seat, but the problem really isn't with the person next to you, it's with the tiny airline seats!
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
But in this case, it's a matter of possibly effecting your comfort level in an already uncomfortable space. That's not the same as infringing on, say, any of your actual rights as a person. Sure, I don't like being crowded on a plane or subway...but that happens regardless of anyone's size.
Meanwhile, fat discrimination limits people's life choices like getting work or being promoted, and has led to all kinds of other issues that don't help anything. To me, that's way more serious than whether I'm comfortable in an airline seat.
07/31/09
Yelling "fire" in a crowded theater and swinging your fists at someone's face is action. Being obese is a state. As soon as we start taking away the rights of citizens to exist in a natural state (and yes, I do consider obesity to be natural) than what is to stop us from denying people the right to be blonde, or tall or ....
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
While I'm very lucky to have skinny genes, I am unlucky enough to have the dreaded acne gene. Acne isn't a choice for me (or anyone, lord knows) but there are things that I could do (not wash my face for days, sleep in heavy makeup) that would cause my acne to get significantly worse.
I do not, however, think that society needs to grant anyone the "right" to be fat, alaskanbrownbear. An obese person should not be forced to buy two tickets anywhere, just like society doesn't force me to put a paper bag on my head during a nasty hormonal breakout... it's just how it goes.
07/31/09
If I were several hundred pounds, did nothing but sit on the couch all day like a caricature of what people think fat people do, and I only moved to hooveround to the kitchen to get more over processed junk food, then so what? Why shouldn't I? If it is my body, then it is my choice, and no one else should shame me for the way I live my life.
Should the government and companies find more ways to make a healthy lifestyle more attainable? Absolutely. Should individuals be shamed for their bodies? Of course not.
07/31/09
07/31/09
Wait, that means that me hanging out at the mall, chasing down all the skinny girls and shoving Big Macs down their throats is bad?
Now what am I supposed to do with all these Big Macs!
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
It's when the twain meet that gives me pause.
Travelling on a trans-Atlantic flight in coach class with a very very heavy man sitting next to me, and taking up a portion of my own seat was uncomfortable at first and then by hour 7 I was angry.
I don't agree that obese people should have to pay for two seats because that's discrimination, but just accepting that you're going to be cramped for many hours is not fair to anyone either.
07/31/09
That's really the airline's fault though. I am very petite, so am comfortable in airline seats. My boyfriend, who is average weight and tall, finds flying to be agony. They're just not made for normal people, because the airline wants to make a profit by fitting as many people on the plane as possible.
07/31/09
My mom and I are both average-sized women, and we fit quite comfortably in our seats (She was actually using part of mine thanks to the overweight man next to her).
I feel for people with long legs, but not for people who can make themselves/others around them more comfortably by buying two seats.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
For example, we don't tell somebody who is paraplegic as a result of their own drunk driving that they can't use handicapped parking spots.
I know. Obesity isn't usually considered a disability because it usually isn't a permanent condition like paralysis. Still a person who is temporarily disabled can apply for a temporary disabled placard.
I don't see why similar accommodations can't be made for very large people. Maybe it's the economics of it all, if there are more obese people that require two seats than disabled people. (I think that is the case, but I'd have to look it up to be sure.) But that is pretty cold, IMO.
We have a lot of overweight in this country, that's just a fact we have to deal with now. We aren't going to instantly fix the problem by making people pay for two seats, or shaming them in public. Any fixes are going to have to involve better healthcare and nutrition education...and it is going to take time.
In the meantime? Compassion, people. Compassion.
07/31/09
When we buy plane tickets, we pay X for Y amount of space. Is it cheap for someone who will use more than Y to need to pay 2Y? No. But it's not fair for anyone else to pay full price and get half a seat because their neighbor is pressing them up against the window.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
Perhaps we should be pushing for larger seats for obese people?
Also, what is your solution? And haven't you been in the position of having to "give" part of your seat to a larger person? I'm a pretty friendly chick, really, but I do have my limits, and I just happen to fucking hate sharing skin-on-skin time with strangers.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
And I could turn it around and ask where the fairness in that is, but what's the point?
In the end, it's two people suffering.
07/31/09
At no point do passengers agree before they board an airplane, that they will not infringe or otherwise impose on their fellow passengers. If this were the case no one with heavy perfume, a loud voice, or a child would be able to fly.
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
Yes, the extremely young are not required to pay for a seat not because they are not using the seat, but because they are not inccuring any of the additional costs associated with passage (i.e. they do not have luggage, do not need to be scanned at security, do not require a ticket, ect.) They also don't have the safety devices that a given to paying passengers. Taking a lap child is more akin to an extra piece of baggage.
07/31/09
When you pay for 1st class you are getting an upgraded passage. This does include larger seats, but it also includes better food, faster check-in and a more attentive staff (among other things)
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
I'm damaging someone because I am making them uncomfortable? I'm sorry but legally that doesn't hold water. I can't sue for damages because you made me feel uncomfortable.
Bottom line is that airlines do not currently run on the "you purchase space" system. If they did than a 100lb woman would pay less than a 225lb linebacker and a 6 year old would pay less than a 40 year old. You can't hold me to a rule that no one else is being held too.
07/31/09
And if someone does not fit into that seat, another seat may be purchased.
I'm not being shitty here, I'm just saying - no matter how many times you try to put it differently, that's how it goes. It's why lap babies aren't charged - because they are not taking up a seat. If you want to bring that same baby in a car seat, you must purchase an airline seat in which to place it.
What you are arguing is comfort - the linebacker is less comfortable in that seat than a toddler, which is a bummer, but it doesn't change how the seat was sold.
eta: :::passes stick back to Vive::: Commence with poking. (We both know better, why are we here again?)
07/31/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
If airlines truly charged for space (as you claim they do) than customers would know, when they bought the ticket, exactly how many square feet their dollar bought and how many square feet they were entitled to take up. A 6 year old would purchase less square feet than a 40 year old. Which is fine, if that's the way they are going to do it. This is not, however, the way airlines are currently run.
08/01/09
08/01/09
08/03/09
08/04/09
I am a lot of things but I do not fabricate ideas simply because they bolster my opinion. I truly believe that one pays for passage on an airplane. If you are going to attempt to disprove my point at least respond to the allegations instead of accusing me of blatant stupidity.
08/05/09
08/05/09
07/31/09
07/31/09
"You got your hair cut in layers...why?"
07/31/09
07/31/09