@amowls: Whoooa wait. That's who this guy is? That man should be dragged out into the street and shot with an overly-decorated gun. And here I never thought I'd ever take a Beckham's side.
When they are 112, I will still buy Vogues if they grace the covers. One because they are fab, two to annoy all the designers who hired those faceless models after them as backlash.
(If your clothes can't stand up to the fabulousness of the model, don't blame the model - go back and do your work again. Vivienne and the Versaces seem to understand.)
But mostly because they are fab.
I agree with Patricia about Kristin's figure. There's some cultural mess going on there, and I do like A-line skirts, but I don't have the strength to do the whole argument today. *sniffle*
Love the idea of that anti-pap handbag, but I bet some photographer sues from a flash in the eye.
I can't imagine a Bettie Page look actually working for Charlotte, personally. For Kristin Davis, sure, but Charlotte was as WASPy and conventional as they come. Ralph Lauren and A-line skirts suited her.
@Ratinski: So I guess the argument is, was Kristin arguing b/c the clothes better suited the character, or was she arguing because she didn't like her own body? Because frankly, I'm not feeling the former so much.
@Rooo sez BISH PLZ: Oh, I'm sure she was at least PARTIALLY arguing because she didn't like her ass, but the "Ralph Lauren" part of the statement makes me think that at least part of it was also for the character.
Yeah, if only the economy were better, I'd totally be buying the shit out of some $70,000 couture dresses. IF ONLY! I guess I'll just have to sit here and wait the business cycle out.
Shane Ritchie forgets to mention that a person discriminated against in the workplace on the grounds of their disability, can potentially seek substantial punitive damages. Being turned down because you don't look like a supermodel is just hard cheese. Abercrombie and Fitch were stupid to allow such a flagrant breach of the relevant Disability Duscrimination Act.
Oh Mr. Blahnik, platforms aren't that bad. Sometimes a platform is the only thing keeping me from getting my pants hemmed properly. (Really it's just because I am too lazy and it isn't the easiest to find the right length pants.)
@nyc-caribbean-ragazza: These women are phenomenally beautiful. And who wouldn't rather see professional models rocking amazing photo shoots on magazine covers over celebs with their windblown hair, fake smiley "this is part of my press junket" best, I mean worst?
(I don't know how to do the cross out/line through)
@nyc-caribbean-ragazza: Absolutely. If Naomi and Linda are rocking it, I'm probably going to break my head to try to look good in a downmarket version of it too, whatever it is.
(And probably the real Kenneth Lane jewelry or whatever if I can find it on sale. And whatever lipstick those girls are selling, whenever.)
@wealhtheow: I have a deer necklace that I wear every day. But I don't change it, or take it off ever. I paid the princely sum of 96 dollars for it, and will take it with me to my grave. Screw my (hypothetical) descendants.
"I never pay attention to costs - it's not attractive to speak about numbers. Why can't we just focus on the beauty of an object? I don't know anything about the financial crisis."
@Zombie MissSkittles is not your kind of lady: When I read the original snippet, I imagined Cavalli wth his fingers in his ears, la la laing away as his Finance Director tried to drum some sense into him.
New Yorkers can cease being envious of our hetwave. At the moment it is bucketing down in London.(just after I spent an hour watering the garden of course).
@Zombie MissSkittles is not your kind of lady: No thanks. I have come out with an angry scarlet heat rash across my torso and only cooler weather will cure it. But I imagine Houston must be airconditioned in the main to cope with such temperatures.
""The Modern Pinup" seems, in its postmodern obliviousness, to take what it wanted of the era and conveniently forget the rest."
And this is a problem, because...?
Jezebel, always focusing on what they can complain about. It seems that the brand of feminism touted here is NOT okay with women doing whatever they want, but here to supply yet another snark-tinged set of ideals by which to judge one's own and others lives.
Just because a certain aesthetic appeals to people doesn't mean they are completely ignorant of history.
@Bunny Themelis: Feminism is not about everyone doing whatever the fuck they want. I suggest you read some of the well-thought out comments in this thread before making such an ignorant statement.
'"The Modern Pinup" seems, in its postmodern obliviousness, to take what it wanted of the era and conveniently forget the rest.'
THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT!
Romanticizing the past for fun isn't a crime against feminism.
Sorry to say it, but I'm finding Jezebel content growing less and less poignant/relevant by the day. It's bordering on blather and I'm starting to get pissed. Not to mention bored.
Step it up a notch ladies. We're not brain dead and we're not lady haters. Stop talking to us like you're our pretentious freshman Womyn Studies tutor.
@nacho_supreme: Wow. I know I'm not brain-dead or lady-hating, thanks. I will continue to use my brain to be critical of trends relevant to my gender, if that's ok with you.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
When they are 112, I will still buy Vogues if they grace the covers. One because they are fab, two to annoy all the designers who hired those faceless models after them as backlash.
(If your clothes can't stand up to the fabulousness of the model, don't blame the model - go back and do your work again. Vivienne and the Versaces seem to understand.)
But mostly because they are fab.
I agree with Patricia about Kristin's figure. There's some cultural mess going on there, and I do like A-line skirts, but I don't have the strength to do the whole argument today. *sniffle*
Love the idea of that anti-pap handbag, but I bet some photographer sues from a flash in the eye.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Jezzies, bets on who takes the win?
07/06/09
Personally I think it's weird to see a 16 year old model a $1500 suit or anything actually, in magazines that are marketed to women.
07/06/09
(I don't know how to do the cross out/line through)
07/06/09
(And probably the real Kenneth Lane jewelry or whatever if I can find it on sale. And whatever lipstick those girls are selling, whenever.)
Some 14-y-o person? Not so much.
07/06/09
I am completely on board for all these women making a strong resurgence in their 40's.
How awesome would it be to be revered for being over 40 as opposed to what has been the case.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Who on earth wears jewels? Or wears jewels EVERY DAY? Omg what.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Urge to kill...rising!
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
04/28/09
And this is a problem, because...?
Jezebel, always focusing on what they can complain about. It seems that the brand of feminism touted here is NOT okay with women doing whatever they want, but here to supply yet another snark-tinged set of ideals by which to judge one's own and others lives.
Just because a certain aesthetic appeals to people doesn't mean they are completely ignorant of history.
04/28/09
04/28/09
'"The Modern Pinup" seems, in its postmodern obliviousness, to take what it wanted of the era and conveniently forget the rest.'
THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT!
Romanticizing the past for fun isn't a crime against feminism.
Sorry to say it, but I'm finding Jezebel content growing less and less poignant/relevant by the day. It's bordering on blather and I'm starting to get pissed. Not to mention bored.
Step it up a notch ladies. We're not brain dead and we're not lady haters. Stop talking to us like you're our pretentious freshman Womyn Studies tutor.
04/28/09