Francesca Lia Block's books absolutely saved me in high school. I was a depressed, angry little girl who hated all the conformity and was just looking for a little solace and my place in the world. I've read her books - all of them - and they preach messages of acceptance, the importance of family and friends, the importance of being true to yourself and not changing just because you're different. These books are beautiful, wonderful works of young adult literature and I would stand up for them against anyone in the world. She makes real life seem magical and everyday struggles seem like tales where the good can triumph. For that, I will always be indebted to her.
I never understand when someone says they want to burn a book, because the concept of "book-burning" creates such a visceral reaction in me, and probably in most everyone here. The quick response is, of course, the Nazis did that but it's more than that. Books = intellectual wealth, and I don't understand a side that thinks it can win an argument by making everyone dumber.
It's not just some books. The Bible = intellectual wealth. Everybody Poops = intellectual wealth He's Just Not That Into You = intellectual wealth The Stand = intellectual wealth
Books are sacred. And even books that HAVE harmed me, are still sacred. I read a Piers Anthony book a few years ago and it was weeks before I could write again, because I was so afraid that I might be capable of drivel like that. But you know what? It was still intellectual wealth. And no one has a right to destroy it.
I was a big FLB fan as a teen, learning so much about Los Angeles (as a Long Island girl) from her, getting into more art films and punk rock because of her, and just being sucked into the Weetzie Bat/Witch Baby world. And Baby Be-Bop is an awesome book.
This is weird, but I like seeing her getting publicity even if someone wants to destroy her work. She's a true original, and one of the most influential authors on my own mind.
@beatrice2000: Mine too! She's amazing. Her books had the same influence on me as a teen, and they really hold up now that I'm an adult. I read a ton of YA, and she's among the very best.
Anyone who can write a compelling, beautiful story about incest is deserving of praise.
Let's send Weetzie, Duck, Dirk, Witch Baby, Cherokee Bat and the rest of the gang from Grandma Fifi's cottage over to the CCLU to demonstrate how civil liberties really work.
The can throw it in with the Merchant of Venice and Huckleberry Finn.
My god, these are the same people who think it's racist to even mention someone's (minority) ethnicity. Because they assume everyone considers it a flaw.
How does reading about a gay teenager or seeing the word "nigger" in print, in the context of a story, harm a child?
Beyond that, how does seeing a book on a shelf without reading it "damag[e]" the "mental and emotional well-being" of people? What ridiculous asshattery.
That said, I'm kind of glad they chose this particular book to single out, because there really is no way to justify their complaints against it. This crusade is doing more to hurt their image than it is to hurt Baby Be-Bop. This book does far more good than harm, if it does harm at all. Targeting it will only encourage others to read it, others who should read it, maybe need to read it. Reading this book as a gay teenager (and again as a gay twentysometing) made me feel loved. And comforted. How they think they can justify taking that away from someone, calling it harmful, I'll never understand. And, call me naive, but I don't think most Americans will understand either.
This sums up my opinion more eloquently that I could have...
Books won't stay banned. They won't burn. Ideas won't go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education.
Mr. Samuel Clemens had this to say about when HIS books were banned, and I think it's quite appropriate given who is attempting to do the banning of this book:
"But the truth is, that when a Library expels a book of mine and leaves an unexpurgated Bible lying around where unprotected youth and age can get hold of it, the deep unconscious irony of it delights me and doesn't anger me."
I just remember watching American History X on FX, and the words "shit" and "fuck" were censored, but "nigger" wasn't. I understand that to censor it would be to go against the point of the movie (in a way), and I guess the TV people (whoever they are) figured that words like shit and fuck served no purpose than to be vulgar (although they replaced them with "stuff," etc).
I don't know where I'm going with this, other than that there are some unpleasant truths in the world that people should know about, to be able to educate themselves to act otherwise (or at least to understand things).
One nice thing you can do to support your libraries is to purchase a swell Banned Books poster from the American Library Association. Call me Pollyanna, but books are windows to worlds that we would never be able to visit. No one has a right to slam that window down. No one.
I feel like there are certain things, when put into a historical perspective, you don't want to be associated with. Pretty sure book-burning is one of those things. Then again, that's probably one of the many reasons I'm not in the CCLU.
Never burn books, but how necessary is it to drop the N word in literature these days? I ask that every time I see a Tarantino film. What does it add to the story? What point does it try to make?
I doubt that the use of the term is the real driving force behind the CCLU's ban, since most of them probably use it behind the protection of their white hoods, but still, I don't automatically accept use of the term without context.
@embarcadero13: IIRC, it comes up during a conversation between two boys, when one of the boys tells the other one that his stepfather liked to beat him and call him the n-word. So it was used to illustrate how abusive this kid's home life was.
@Lilah: It's been a while for me, but I think you are right. Almost any time FLB uses such language, it's to demonstrate violence or abuse (and many of her characters don't have great home lives).
@weetziebat: And I will try my hardest to resist the urge to stand outside of THAT library distributing gay porn, birth control, and nips of Jack Daniels
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
It's not just some books.
The Bible = intellectual wealth.
Everybody Poops = intellectual wealth
He's Just Not That Into You = intellectual wealth
The Stand = intellectual wealth
Books are sacred. And even books that HAVE harmed me, are still sacred. I read a Piers Anthony book a few years ago and it was weeks before I could write again, because I was so afraid that I might be capable of drivel like that. But you know what? It was still intellectual wealth. And no one has a right to destroy it.
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
This is weird, but I like seeing her getting publicity even if someone wants to destroy her work. She's a true original, and one of the most influential authors on my own mind.
06/16/09
Anyone who can write a compelling, beautiful story about incest is deserving of praise.
06/16/09
Displaying it doesn't mean condoning it.
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
My god, these are the same people who think it's racist to even mention someone's (minority) ethnicity. Because they assume everyone considers it a flaw.
06/16/09
Beyond that, how does seeing a book on a shelf without reading it "damag[e]" the "mental and emotional well-being" of people? What ridiculous asshattery.
That said, I'm kind of glad they chose this particular book to single out, because there really is no way to justify their complaints against it. This crusade is doing more to hurt their image than it is to hurt Baby Be-Bop. This book does far more good than harm, if it does harm at all. Targeting it will only encourage others to read it, others who should read it, maybe need to read it. Reading this book as a gay teenager (and again as a gay twentysometing) made me feel loved. And comforted. How they think they can justify taking that away from someone, calling it harmful, I'll never understand. And, call me naive, but I don't think most Americans will understand either.
06/16/09
Books won't stay banned. They won't burn. Ideas won't go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education.
-Alfred Whitney
06/16/09
06/16/09
"But the truth is, that when a Library expels a book of mine and leaves an unexpurgated Bible lying around where unprotected youth and age can get hold of it, the deep unconscious irony of it delights me and doesn't anger me."
06/16/09
I don't know where I'm going with this, other than that there are some unpleasant truths in the world that people should know about, to be able to educate themselves to act otherwise (or at least to understand things).
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
I doubt that the use of the term is the real driving force behind the CCLU's ban, since most of them probably use it behind the protection of their white hoods, but still, I don't automatically accept use of the term without context.
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09