@yvanehtnioj: Unfortunately, they probably do. They don't account for massive abnormalities, every organism has the right to live according to what they believe. Sorry, I'm just a little sick of the right-to-lifers and their whole belief system. #babies
I'm revealing my ignorance here, but I had no idea that the US banned people with HIV from entering the country. This shocked me more than anything else in the post. A little googling reveals that the other 11 countries with similar bans are: Armenia, Brunei, Iraq, Libya, Moldova, Oman, Qatar, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Sudan. ([www.washingtonpost.com])
I didn't realize there was a ban on people with HIV entering the country. You must be able to get exceptions, since I can think of several people who have adopted kids with HIV from Africa.
I'm glad the ban will be reversed. Why next year, though? Does it take a long time to do something like that? #babies
@Plate2.18: You can get a waiver but it's expensive and time-consuming. Hey, it's the same for Nazis! Except there's no waiver. (As far as I know. I'm a defense lawyer and the hubs does immigration.) #babies
@Plate2.18: Oh, and it terms of "next year" it will go into affect the first few weeks of January. It's in the middle of a mandatory waiting/comment period - the process started back in June I believe (which, in terms of "acting fast" in Washington, 6 months is pretty much as good as it gets) #babies
@thebootyfaerie: To be fair, after I read an article and learned about all the anti-hate speech laws that are enacted around the world, I was pretty shocked.
Don't get me wrong- I absolutely despise the world's hatemongers- but I also hate censorship.
The only problem was that so many of these religious leaders didn't just worry that they'd be charged with crime for preaching against homosexuality- they said it would happen (when there was nothing in the bill at all saying so). #babies
@thebootyfaerie: A ridiculous fear, by the way, considering that incitement to violence is one of the hardest things to prove under First Amendment law. A dude gave a speech at a KKK rally encouraging people to seek "revengeance" and THAT speech was considered protected under the First Amendment.
The people who cry "free speech" in response to hate crimes legislation are ignorant tools. But you already knew that. #babies
@allie.homziak: Kinda ironic when you consider the nearby Ben & Jerry's HQ and Magic Hat Brewery... I visited 10 years ago - beautiful place, great cheese, maple syrup, nice people too! #babies
@lalie (apologetic mess): That's kind of what a lot of these studies feel like... "SCIENTISTS HAVE FOUND NO ONE LIKES YOU." "RESEARCHERS FOUND THAT HAVING SEX WITH YOU IS AN UNAPPEALING PROSPECT TO 98.4% OF THE PEOPLE YOU MEET."
I need a scientific study that boosts my self esteem, dammit. #babies
@lalie (apologetic mess): the upside is, sounds like you could be a model. didn't proust say something like "let's leave the obviously pretty women to men with no imagination"? or did someone just tell me that to make me feel better? nevermind, let's take it as true. #babies
Honestly, I couldn't think you're overreacting more. I simply don't understand why it's so unacceptable to people that - if all of our psychology is evolutionarily shaped (and it is) - our concept of beauty might also be.
What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that we prioritize symmetry in beauty, attractiveness, etc. (we do; studies confirm it)? What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that any factor that leads to less bonding time with infants would be selectively bred out of a species (it has: this study is about our minds' effects to breed out birth abnormalities)? What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that our social construct of beauty is derived extensively (if not exclusively) from our intellectual parsing of our biological urges?
Look, we all have physical flaws, but pretending like it's a monstrous thing for people to prefer people who are attractive over those who have physical flaws is to be unreasonable. It's as if you insist that art can never just be 'pretty', but rather must always have deep insightful meaning, even if it's unavailable to many onlookers. Sometimes it's okay to admit that attractive things are attractive. It's not always a personal attack.
What a waste of money this study was - did they really think we'd chage as we grew up? BABIES prefer symmetry in facial features - that study's been done.
10/31/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
Sad. #babies
10/30/09
I'm glad the ban will be reversed. Why next year, though? Does it take a long time to do something like that? #babies
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
So... when are they doing the "Thou Shalt Not Kill" lessons? #babies
10/30/09
Don't get me wrong- I absolutely despise the world's hatemongers- but I also hate censorship.
The only problem was that so many of these religious leaders didn't just worry that they'd be charged with crime for preaching against homosexuality- they said it would happen (when there was nothing in the bill at all saying so). #babies
10/31/09
The people who cry "free speech" in response to hate crimes legislation are ignorant tools. But you already knew that. #babies
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
Definite WTF moment of the day. #babies
10/31/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
Add that to that recently posted study that men don't like un-curvy thin women, and I'm 0 for 2 here. #babies
10/30/09
I need a scientific study that boosts my self esteem, dammit. #babies
10/30/09
10/30/09
Hasn't this been around for awhile? They made a joke about it on Glee. #babies
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
06/24/09
What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that we prioritize symmetry in beauty, attractiveness, etc. (we do; studies confirm it)? What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that any factor that leads to less bonding time with infants would be selectively bred out of a species (it has: this study is about our minds' effects to breed out birth abnormalities)? What is possibly unreasonable about suggesting that our social construct of beauty is derived extensively (if not exclusively) from our intellectual parsing of our biological urges?
Look, we all have physical flaws, but pretending like it's a monstrous thing for people to prefer people who are attractive over those who have physical flaws is to be unreasonable. It's as if you insist that art can never just be 'pretty', but rather must always have deep insightful meaning, even if it's unavailable to many onlookers. Sometimes it's okay to admit that attractive things are attractive. It's not always a personal attack.
06/24/09
06/24/09