• Jezebel
  • celebrity
  • sex
  • fashion
  • Profile logout login

#annawintourdeathwatch

Jezebel

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #snapjudgment,
  • #groupthink,
  • etc.

New York, 1:12 AM
Mon Nov 9
22 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip your editors:
tips@jezebel.com

Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
Email | Twitter

Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan
Email | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Anna North
Email | Twitter
Sadie Stein
Email | Twitter

Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
Email | Twitter

Contributors:
Jenna Sauers
Email
Rich Juzwiak
Email | Twitter
Lizzie Skurnick
Email

Interns:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter


Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
Email | Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO Jezebel RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1770 Subscribers
Jezebel
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Betsy Betsy
    01/03/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    I don't know, Tatiana. Yes, the profiles with actresses are far too self-important and silly, but was the supermodel era any better? Are glamazons any more relatable? They became celebrities in their own right, as you remember, for posing for pictures.


    I liked seeing Scarlett Johansson posing for American Vogue, for instance, since she actually had a body comparable to mine - I could suddenly see that I could look great in designer clothing, too. It's arguable that actresses shouldn't be instantly granted interviews and 5-page profiles, but yeah Tatiana, unfortunately us "5-foot-nothings" need ideas on how to dress too.


    Maybe less heiresses and profiles on people we can economically relate to, as well, would be helpful. Not sure about it being a supermodel-exclusive venue, though.

     Reply
    Betsy was starred Betsy was unstarred
    Image of dreamypisces dreamypisces
    01/03/09

    @Beebs: I think whats needed is an even split. Sure some celeb profiles are fine but I CRAVE models like Crawford, Turlington, Campbell and the others. Even Moss - when there was only one like her but now that they all have no meat on them it's just become so....BORING!


    To much of any one thing is never a good thing to be had....

     Reply
    dreamypisces was starred dreamypisces was unstarred
    Image of Betsy Betsy
    01/03/09

    @dreamypisces: Agreed. That Vogue Paris editorial with Crawford was stunning, especially because it was a woman we were looking at, not a 16-year-old. What I'm asking for is precisely what you said, by way of celeb profiles.. more diverse women, not just homogenous mannequins selected as if they were being pumped out of a factory.


    I've seen Tatiana expressing views that were quite anti-diversity, unfortunately. I don't get how they fit in Jezebel, but whatever.

     Reply
    Betsy was starred Betsy was unstarred
    Image of TatianaTheAnonymousModel TatianaTheAnonymousModel
    01/04/09

    @Beebs: Anti-diversity? Excuse me? One of my biggest problems with American Vogue under Anna Wintour is the magazine's ambivalence about diversity and I never miss an opportunity to say so.
     Reply
    TatianaTheAnonymousModel was starred TatianaTheAnonymousModel was unstarred
    Image of Betsy Betsy
    01/04/09

    @TatianaTheAnonymousModel: Not racial diversity in models, diversity in terms of who can model for photoshoots in magazines. I remember you talking about "5-foot-nothings" who apparently were not good enough for their clothes as 6-foot-tall skinny glamazons. I think it's fine that you're proud of your figure and so on, but that comment was pretty offensive in my book.
     Reply
    Betsy was starred Betsy was unstarred
    Image of TatianaTheAnonymousModel TatianaTheAnonymousModel
    01/05/09

    @Beebs: Uh, sorry for pointing out that actresses are often short?
     Reply
    TatianaTheAnonymousModel was starred TatianaTheAnonymousModel was unstarred
    Image of Stabby McStabberson Stabby McStabberson
    01/03/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    (sorry to piss on another post of yours, tatiana - i love 99.99% of your work, i've been stabby mccrankypants lately because of the holidays)


    helmut newton's leda and the swan as 70's porn is ridiculous. the 70s porn aesthetic is overdone, stale, and trite, and was so even in the early 90s (see: klein, calvin) though it has some interesting formal elements.


    this is edgy:


    Artist Unknown; Jai Vilas Palace Museum in Gwalior, Northern Madhya Pradesh, India



    or this...


    copy after leonardo



    or how about this by francois boucher in 18th century france...



    suck it, helmut.

     Reply
    Stabby McStabberson was starred Stabby McStabberson was unstarred
    Image of sisepuede is the femmiest femme of them all sisepuede is the femmiest femme of them all
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Tatiana, thanx for putting up the Helmut Newton swan copulation picture. After I read the article last night I was up half the night looking for it online, gave up, and finally just crossed my fingers that Jezebel would post it today.


    Also, I look fwd to your posts with embarrasing enthusiasm. I think you are the coolest.

     Reply
    sisepuede is the femmiest femme of them all was starred sisepuede is the femmiest femme of them all was unstarred
    Image of hfree hfree
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    I have always loved that photgraph.


    I think people want Vogue to be better because it is this grand dame, we can't think of the world without it, it's the New York Time of fashion magazines. It should be the best, which is why it is so sad that it's not.


    I haven't opened the magazine in months, even though I subscribe. I was ready to let it run out, until I noticed I'm paid up through January of next year. Maybe I can reallocate the funds to the New Yorker?

     Reply
    hfree was starred hfree was unstarred
    Image of special_boots special_boots
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Gonna have to disagree with you on the Leda/swan setup. It's gross, but not even compelling gross, just sort of stiff and awkward gross. And I'm embarrassed for the model. Yuck.
     Reply
    special_boots was starred special_boots was unstarred
    Image of DangerMouse DangerMouse
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    They definitely need a wider variety of shoots to foster creativity in our responses to LOLVogue.
     Reply
    DangerMouse was starred DangerMouse was unstarred
    Image of pandorasmittens pandorasmittens
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Apparently Helmut Newton is the only person Zeus will allow to photograph him.
     Reply
    pandorasmittens was starred pandorasmittens was unstarred
    Image of VaginaWig is A Merkin VaginaWig is A Merkin
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    "For the December issue, it sent a writer off to discover the 'charms' of Wal-Mart and Target."


    This reminded me of The Simple Life episode where Paris Hilton has to go to Wal-Mart and she asks, "What is Wal-Mart? Is that where they sell walls?" Ah, to be so out of touch with middle America must be fabulous.

     Reply
    VaginaWig is A Merkin was starred VaginaWig is A Merkin was unstarred
    Image of pandorasmittens pandorasmittens
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Vogue is just as narcissistic as the socialites profiled within its pages: it has elevated itself so high that it actually believes that their fantasy will dictate reality. Trends have evolved as the magazine remains stagnant, and Vogue is reduced to a wailing Norma Desmond, forever waiting for its closeup.
     Reply
    pandorasmittens was starred pandorasmittens was unstarred
    Image of PixiePerson PixiePerson
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Leda and the Swan has always freaked me out. Seeing a picture of it.. kind of worse.
     Reply
    PixiePerson was starred PixiePerson was unstarred
    Image of Witchtit: Your low productivity advisor Witchtit: Your low productivity advisor
    01/02/09

    @PixiePerson: Yes,I cant help thinking that swans would not make gentle, considerate lovers. They would not make you breakfast in the morning either. Feathery uptight jerks.
     Reply
    Witchtit: Your low productivity advisor was starred Witchtit: Your low productivity advisor was unstarred
    Image of dcdulce dcdulce
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    you had me at "pureed into a gossipy brownie"
     Reply
    dcdulce was starred dcdulce was unstarred
    Image of TheUptightMidwesterner TheUptightMidwesterner
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    I am older than most on this board and I have to say that I buy Vogue about 3 times a year and my lasp issue was the final straw- Never again.


    It is literally reading the same issue over and over again and I feel that is is written soley for a select group of designers, staffers and Wintour circlers.


    The models even look more bored than usual.

     Reply
    TheUptightMidwesterner was starred TheUptightMidwesterner was unstarred
    Image of Penny Penny
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    Wait, also, I am not sure if Jezebel covered this, but what is up with the highlighted quote about Michelle Obama? I can't find my issue right now, but it was something along the lines of "we can't wait to see how she decorates!"
     Reply
    Penny was starred Penny was unstarred
    Image of morninggloria morninggloria
    01/02/09

    @Penny Plastic (Archetype): That's the first thing I think when I come across an Ivy League-educated female lawyer.
     Reply
    morninggloria was starred morninggloria was unstarred
    Image of bloodflower bloodflower
    01/02/09

    @Penny Plastic (Archetype): yeah because that's totally on top of her list.
     Reply
    bloodflower was starred bloodflower was unstarred
    Image of sarah.of.a.lesser.god (aka Mrs. BrutallyHonestHobbit) sarah.of.a.lesser.god (aka Mrs. BrutallyHonestHobbit)
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    They need to replace Plum Sykes with Kumquat Dykes.
     Reply
    sarah.of.a.lesser.god (aka Mrs. BrutallyHonestHobbit) was starred sarah.of.a.lesser.god (aka Mrs. BrutallyHonestHobbit) was unstarred
    Image of Eeva Eeva
    01/02/09

    In reply to New York Times Bets Against Anna Wintour, American Vogue
    I'll readily deny that the Newton photograph is beautiful. Unsettling and somewhat compelling, yes, but just because it features a gorgeous blonde and a swan doesn't mean it's beautiful.


    Now, if he had only added a unicorn and a rainbow...

     Reply
    Eeva was starred Eeva was unstarred
    Image of Mama Penguino Mama Penguino
    01/02/09

    @Eeva: Isn't this just a modern representation of Leda and the Swan?
     Reply
    Mama Penguino was starred Mama Penguino was unstarred
    Image of jenalicious jenalicious
    01/02/09

    @Eeva: yeah, i have to agree there. im not that blown away. the model looks unconscious, not sexy.
     Reply
    jenalicious was starred jenalicious was unstarred
    Image of bloodflower bloodflower
    01/02/09

    @Mama Penguino: that's what i thought. that story gives me creeps but oddly enough i like that photograph.
     Reply
    bloodflower was starred bloodflower was unstarred
    Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Jezebel account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.