<![CDATA[Jezebel: American Titocracy]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: American Titocracy]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/american titocracy http://jezebel.com/tag/american titocracy <![CDATA[ Would You Get "Botox For The Résumé"? ]]> "Who would ever dream that '20-plus years of experience' would be a liability? These are strange times." That's Lisa Johnson Mandell, a journalist who lives in LA and should know better than to say something like that, but anyway she stopped getting work around her late forties, and she didn't know why, until her husband broke it to her that it was because she was old. So she strategically took the first ten years off her CV, stopped giving anyone her graduation year and had some "youthful" pictures taken. And now she has a job running a pop culture website so she told the Wall Street Journal all about it. (She's 49.) I could express sincere and unqualified horror at this trend, but as a proponent of not lying about one's age, I have to confess: the thought of looking for jobs at pop culture websites in twenty years makes me happier about the fact that pop culture websites will probably figure out a way to kill me first.

Botox For The Résumé: One Woman's Makeover [WSJ]

]]>
Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020436&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear Models Of The World: Are We All Too Busy Starving Ourselves To Form A Union Already? ]]> Modeling. I'll be honest: I didn't really give much of a shit about the plight of its willowy practitioners before I met Tatiana. Now, Tatiana's going to be okay: she's doing this to travel and learn and meet the sort of people you wouldn't meet performing the other types of slave labor to which educated young twentysomethings generally subject themselves, but the rest of them remind me of all those once-promising high school basketball players languishing in foreign club teams and living paycheck to paycheck in incredibly cramped quarters with nothing getting them up in the morning beyond the whole "Well, I've held out this long…" rationale. Which is to say, models are just like us. Except! In what other industry can your boss get away with telling an 108-pound cash cow like Coco Rocha: "We don't want you to be anorexic, we just want you to look it"? I mean, sure, it's one thing to "look" anorexic to me, an objective observer, but this is an industry, as we found out yesterday, in which the conventional wisdom holds that Karolina Kurkova is "fat"? Anyway, after last week's harrowing experience volunteering for the Plutocracy, Tatiana came up with some good ideas for reforming the business. We really do hope the agencies of the world take her advice!

It occurs to me that frequently in these columns, there is a moment where, finally alone and generally late into the night of a long day, I find myself reduced to tears by some list of knocks and slights. Perhaps this only means I need a new device; I don’t think of myself as such a sad sack figure as all that. But this week, actually the night after my spirit-crushing turn as a volunteer clotheshorse for a designer who most definitely could have afforded to pay me, my sadness metastasized not into tears, but into a rage-inflected political platform that just might transform my industry.

Well, OK, first I cried. Then I thought: models should unionize to work for better conditions and rates of pay.

It’s a common misconception that modeling is easy, safe and highly lucrative — the reality is that the girls with the million-dollar campaigns are so rare I wouldn’t believe they actually existed if I didn’t see them at night clubs during fashion week. Most models I know are lucky if they are working at all; between agency commissions (70% in Paris, 50% in Milan, 20% in New York), travel expenses, and rent in the various pricey cities in which we are required to live, your eventual wages come so garnished I’ve known plenty of models who can’t always afford food. Even the girls who are lucky enough to work every day are doing well if they break even, and can sneak off to Germany or Los Angeles or Hong Kong and make a quick buck shooting catalog jobs every once in a while.

And safe? Once I was staying with a girl from Seattle in a shitty one-bedroom (total number of models: six! Minimum in rent our agency would’ve made from the shitty one-bedroom that month, assuming a consistent model population: $5400!). We were both on option for the same editorial (daily rate: $150 and lunch). She got the job.

She returned home nine hours later, hair and body painted silver. The magazine was doing a “green” issue; this eco-conscious theme was enacted in, variously, shots in which the poor Seattle girl had a tulip plant placed in her mouth, shots in which she had to lie on top of a scratchy 8 ft. hedgerow while the photographer shot from a crane, and shots in which she closed her eyes and shards of broken glass were applied to her face. They put dirt in her mouth and glass on her eyelids and painted her silver from head to toe. My roommate showered twice and vomited once that night.

Models have incredibly short-lived careers, and our collective youth, third-world origins, and the instability of the market we work in makes our bargaining positions, individually, weak. For every 15-year-old wunderkind who stalks 40 runways a season and books $100,000 perfume campaigns for college money, there are at least a hundred girls who turn 25 with a few grand in bank at best, realize their careers are over, and that they never graduated high school.

It’s also no wonder given how close many models are to insolvency that there are areas where modeling shades into prostitution; modeling sort of prepares you — trains you, even — to see your income in your own body. And also to hang around with plenty of creepy, older, rich dudes. A + B can = C. The BBC did an exposé in 2000 that caught Milanese businessmen on hidden camera trying to buy sex from models as young as 13 in night clubs, and uncovered evidence of agency bookers acting as procurers and drug dealers. In the furor that ensued, Gérard Marie and Xavier Moreau, two top executives at the Elite agency, lost their jobs. The industry promised a clean-up. There was talk of “standards,” of girls younger than 17 being accompanied by chaperones at all times, of blacklisting clients who used or promoted drugs.

Gérard Marie — who was filmed soliciting a reporter who he thought was a model for sex — is currently back at the helm of Elite Paris. I do not know if the man who explained his desire to sleep with underaged models thusly: “We are men, we have our needs” has reformed. I do know that such episodes of revolving-door contrition and forgiveness fill me with disgust, and that one of the biggest tasks of any models’ union would be to keep its membership safe.

A union would also offer, obviously, the benefits of collective bargaining. The overwhelming counterweight of the fashion business class’s wealth give models an unacceptably weak negotiating position. A union could help insure models’ best long-term interests are served by their jobs — a union could argue for retirement benefits, and, in the USA, health insurance coverage. A union could mandate that sufficient time be given for models under 16 to attend school, without setting back their careers. A union could also serve as a voice for models’ interests in the ongoing debate over what is perhaps our biggest immediate health issue — the slightly-underweight physique we are required to maintain. A union could protest and shame under- and non-paying clients, a union could mandate that appropriate food be available at every job, and a union could ensure that conditions on the job site always meet safety standards, so nobody has to pose covered in broken glass or eat dirt ever again.

The obvious counterpoint to modeling is, of course, acting. The Screen Actors’ Guild does an admirable job of representing the interests of a workforce that is dispersed over a vast geography, and which enjoys short-term contract-based employment, when it gets employment at all. It’s ironic that one of the reasons commercial modeling — catalogs, television ads and their ilk — is so rewarding when compared with high-fashion modeling — magazine editorials, runway, etc — is because of SAG’s vigilance; commercial castings in Los Angeles are not infrequently stated union jobs. And even the ones that are non-union are pretty highly paid. I have friends who are only able to work full-time in Paris because they have commercials still airing in the U.S., and receive the appropriate checks quarterly.

Individually, we are weak, and wealthy white men manage to make an awful lot of cash off our bodies and labor. Collectively, we could hold the industry we work in to a higher standard, and perhaps even change the nature of fashion itself. I imagine the union would have an awful lot to say, for instance, about those clients who put “NO ETHNICS” on their casting notices, and those agencies who fail to notice, or care, that certain of their charges have eating disorders.

Of course there are plenty of reasons to doubt any of this will come to pass. The economy is especially dreadful right now; any moves to unionize would be viewed as a threat by the class that controls the fashion capital. Besides, every year there’s a new raft of 14-year-olds from countries with economies far shittier than ours, and these 14-year-olds are all six feet tall and very, very hungry. And, through no fault of their own, they exercise a huge deflationary force on the modeling labor market. But it occurred to me, as I was working that presentation for that designer who amuses herself by collecting Picasso, that the reason she was paying the security guards at the event and not me was because the security guards have a union. And I don’t.

I want to at least try my best to change that.

E-mail Tatiana at Tatiana.Anymodel@gmail.com

Earlier: Welcome To America, Models! Tatiana Can't Wait For The Extra Competition. It Was Almost Getting Too Easy.

Related:

Model Bosses Quit After BBC Exposé [BBC]
Girls Interrupted [NY Mag]

]]>
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:40:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019688&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Five New Job Titles That Are Corporate Code For "Hot Girl" ]]> This will shock you, but apparently some women get jobs at hedge funds solely on the basis that they are hot. “You meet these bimbos and they say, ‘Oh, I work at a hedge fund,’ and you think, What?!?” one "head of an investment bank who pals around with high net worth investors" tells W Magazine. “And then you realize, Oh, this is, like, the PR girl. And it's a wildly successful strategy." Yeah, sure, until the only women working on Wall Street are brainless bimbos because all the smart women have been driven away by the financial sector's overpowering, self-destructive atmosphere of misogyny…oh wait. Anyway, the story — while it's annoyingly absent of internal memos detailing illegal hiring practices or, for that matter, pictures of any of these hedge fund hos — reminded me how, no matter which way the economy blows, the American workforce, since the days of flight attendants in hot pants, has always found a place — and a visa! — for a sufficiently hot girl. In fact, as those hedge fund gurus are well-aware, opportunities have never been brighter!

1. Television News Anchor. Okay, so this is obvious, but topical, because surely you've found yourself in recent weeks thinking, "What would Tim Russert's female equivalent look like?" And is there a single woman of prominence who looks anything remotely like her? No.
2. Pharmaceutical sales representative. (Or really, most jobs ending in "representative" now that our call centers have all been relocated in India.) Commonly recruited from college cheerleading teams, the practice of hiring hot drug reps probably originated around the time Big Pharma realized it could sell a lot of mood-enhancing pills to people who didn't need them if they took doctors out to dinner here and there. There's been some cutbacks in this industry since the major pharmaceutical companies got so focused on building their sales forces they forgot to develop any new drugs, but I bet being a babe doesn't hurt.
3. Any kind of "Director" that is not "Managing" This is obviously a gross generalization but my sense is that, from publishing to fashion to design to advertising to basically any sector besides film or traffic, "directing" is one of those things that can be done by people with minimal actual skill and therefore they probably got hired because their boss liked looking at them. I'm pretty sure "director" was a popular title at American Apparel, though in that case I might amend that last sentence to just finish reading "naked."
4. Intern When did all female magazine interns start looking like they'd been cast for a reality show? Seriously, when?
5. Italian cabinet member. In a scene in the latest British Esquire, Silvio Berlusconi is giving a town hall meeting and a woman rises from the audience to ask a question about the economy and her career prospects. "Don't worry," he tells her. "I'm sure a woman as beautiful as you can easily find a rich man to settle down with." But wait, it's not so bleak as all that! If she's really so insistent on working, I'm sure there's a spot for her in his cabinet.

Money Honeys [W Magazine]

]]>
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:40:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019327&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A Brief History Of Stewardess Porn… ]]> Would you believe if I told you that in some regions of the world stewardesses are sort of expected to be SEX SYMBOLS? Well, Air India just grounded some flight attendants on charges of being FAT. ONLY IN INDIA, right? Wrong! As you'll learn if you click the picture, sexist policies w/r/t flight attending have a long and sordid history in this very country! But damn if those Southwest babes didn't have nice gams back in the day. [BBC]

Here international airlines are ranked on the basis of stewardess hotness. You'll note Australian airline Qantas is on the list but Qantas is totally a respectable airline, I don't think they have ever crashed and they fired that stewardess who had mile high sex with Ralph Fiennes.

Here's a picture I found from a blog post I found on the history of sexy stewardess uniforms and another blog post on the history of sexism w/r/t sexy stewardesses.

And here's an old Southwest Airlines commercial.

]]>
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014092&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ American Apparel CEO Orders Subordinate To Pleasure Herself; She Services Him With Lawsuit ]]> Perhaps you've heard enough out of American Apparel Chief Executive Onanist Dov Charney. He masturbated in front of a reporter, sleeps with his employees, promotes hot 17-year-olds to replace veterans, took himself public in one of the shadiest entries to the public markets in the history of financial engineering, told the Wall Street Journal the CFO hired to straighten up his finances was a "loser," and generally perpetuates the kind of working environment I'd vilify as the Worst Thing Ever if I didn't kind of respect that he owns the largest remaining clothing factory in the country. Okay, so…he got sued again, this time by three year company veteran Jeneleen Floyd, after going completely batshit in a Perry Edward Smith-esque fit of preordained craziness one day. An eyewitnesses says the catalyst for the outburst appeared to be a combination of anxiety that his L.A. factory would be the target of an immigration raid, and fury over his Wikipedia page, which has since endured quite a few revisions, including a few at the hands of his right-hand woman Iris Alonso. How not to manage people, in a few simple clauses, after the jump. (And yeah, there's sex.)

10. On March 13, Plaintiff was working in her office which she shares with other American Apparel employees. Defendant Charney barged into the office screaming and yelling Plaintiff's name in a loud voice. After he entered the office, Defendant Charney continued to rant and rage at Plaintiff, while wildly waving his arms in a threatening manner. Defendant Charney placed his face in extremely close proximity to Plaintiff's face, to the point that Defendant Charney's spit struck Plainfiff's face, while he continued to repeatedly threaten that he was going to "kick your ass."

11. Defendant Charney repeatedly shouted to Plaintiff that she should be f**king scared" and that if she did not do what he asked, plaintiff needed to resign. Defendant Charney made several references to an interview he had conducted with Jane magazine wherein he had received oral sex from an employee during the course of the interview and the reporter had engaged in masturbation. Defendant Charney sat down and ordered Plaintiff to "pretend to masturbate."

12. Plaintiff continued in a state of shock and terror and refused to respond in any manner to Defendant's demands. In addition Plaintiff was extremely embarrassed and humiliated at being sexually objectified in the presence of her co-workers, including her immediate supervisor, Matthew Swenson.

13. After an extended pause waiting for Plaintiff to respond to his command, and realizing that she had no intentions of complying, Defendant Charney then ordered Mr. Swenson to "pretend to masturbate." As Mr. Swenson complied with his Defendant Charney's instruction, Defendant Charney moved next to him and simulated an oral sex act with him.

14. Shortly after arriving home that evening, Plaintiff received a phone call from her supervisor, Mr. Swenson, who informed her that Defendant Charney had just called him screaming at him and demanding that he call her and instruct her to immediately call Defendant Charney. Plaintiff called Defendant Charney as instructed. Defendant Charney proceeded to launch another verbal tirade at Plaintiff, indlucing such statements as, "I don't give a f**k about you, your dinner or your f**king life, I have thousands of employees. I don't need to waste my time on you." Defendant Charney demanded that Plaintiff immediately work on a project relating to his public profile. Plaintiff complied with his demands which required her to work until almost midnight.

American Apparel Employee: My Boss Is A Jerkoff [TMZ]

Related: Change At American Apparel [WSJ] Woody Allen Dressed Down by American Apparel In Response To Lawsuit [NYDN]

Earlier: Working At American Apparel All It's Coked Up To Be Everything I Needed To Know About The American Economy I Learned At American Apparel

]]>
Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:00:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012440&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Girl Scout Robber Stefanie Woods: Sociopath? Or Helpless Victim Of The Terrible Disease Of Painkiller Addiciton? ]]> Stefanie Woods is a photogenic 18-year-old whose crime spree has captivated idyllic Palm Beach. If Law & Order taught me anything it's that she's also a sociopath. But see if you think I'm giving humanity too much credit: it all started when Woods, a part-time model, started chatting up a nine-year-old Girl Scout selling cookies outside a Wynn Dixie. Then she had a friend grab the kid's envelope of $168 and ran back to her car. (This crime was convicted as petty theft and has been referred to in media reports as a "ripoff" but I am pretty sure there are states in which you'd call it "robbery," especially if her name had been so curiously spelled by a non-Caucasian parent, but whatevs.) Okay, then she came back to the same grocery store, and bragged about what she'd pulled off. Then she gave the finger to news cameras. She declared her lack of remorse before a camera.

She told a judge she was a drug addict who had taken Xanax, Ecstasy, OxyContin, heroin, coke and LSD, to which the judge replied, "If all that is true, you should be dead," a statement that becomes immeasurably more accurate without its preambulatory clause. She also: skipped out on a Denny's bill — Denny's! thank the deities for poetic justice — and stabbed her boyfriend with a pocket knife and keyed his car...Oh, I don't know, maybe she's just a worthless drug addict. Anyway now she's finally going away, to juvi, and apparently also "crying," and definitely also sporting a fresh set of highlights. Who knows, maybe she will become even more famous in prison. The Mumia Abu-Jamal of our Generation. Then I can die.

Some videos:


Paris Hilton Of Palm Beach Has A Problem [NPR]
Girl Scout Cookie Thief Sentenced [Fox 29]
"You Should Be Dead" [Palm Beach Post]
The Part Where She Skips Out On A Denny's Tab [CBS 12]
Videogum Weighs In [Videogum]
"I Don't Know, Doesn't Everybody Like Money? [Fox 29]
"If Ian MacKaye Were Here, He Would Grab That Frappuccino Out Of Her Hand And Smash It Over Her Head And Say, 'Chill Out'" [Metatribes]

]]>
Thu, 29 May 2008 12:00:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393985&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sharpen The Knives: A Science Fiction Convention Happened, And Some <i>Fat People</i> Came! ]]> When last we wrote about science fiction conventions we learned about something called the Open Source Boob Project, wherein women attendees kindly volunteered to wear buttons allowing desirous men to grope their tits. If only all convention attendees were so open and accepting! Last weekend, a woman named Rachel Moss attended the World's Leading Feminist Science Fiction Convention or WisCon, about which she blogged,"This is my second year attending WisCon. I go because I love this. I remember how much I hate my fellow women, and then I go the whole rest of the year thankful that normal life is never this horrible" before posting pictures of various obese attendees complete with snarky captions. Rachel has since been publicly shamed and both apologized and removed her post, but a screengrab of her post excerpted in another forum arrived in our inbox yesterday night.

So here's the thing: Rachel Moss seems like an intelligent, cool, normal person. What the fuck do such people really want with mocking the fats? Did I not get the memo about how fat-trolling burns calories? I have friends like this. Indie rock listening friends who preach tolerance and limiting their carbon intakes low and desiring change in government — and yeah, Moss is an Obama girl! — who nevertheless disdain fat people and for whom being relatively thin almost seems to be a conversational prerequisite. Because fat people remind them of the suburbs they so detested as hopelessly victimized youths? I guess. But isn't that just so boring? Yes. So boring I wouldn't bother posting about it, except for my fear that such people are totally going to turn into Republicans one day.

The Offending Post
Public Shaming [Amptoons]
The Dimensions Of Hypersurfaces

]]>
Wed, 28 May 2008 14:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011411&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Washington Post</i> Magazine Runs Livejournal-y Cover Story By Unemployed <i>Male</i> Blogger. So Where's The Sultry Photo Shoot? ]]> Because one can never get one's fill of first-person newspaper Sunday magazine stories by unemployed people in which nothing much happens, I read a cover story in the Washington Post Magazine called "Terminated," wherein a man named T.M. Shine — and, you will be shocked to learn, he blogs! — gets laid off from his job and watches life collapse into a long malaisey mope-rock montage involving blueberry pancakes, paperwork, tear-inducing episodes of Extreme Makeover, and feeling like a john while meeting his old office manager in an abandoned Krispy Kreme parking lot to pick up the possessions the corporate overlords wouldn't give him time to pack. Unlike Emily Gould, Shine is not pictured in revealing loungewear, or at all. We learn he is: "a little older than Prince and not nearly as old as Jerry Seinfeld." We also learn that Laura, the office manager, is concerned his age/looks make him somehow unappetizing as a prospective hire.

"I'm worried," she says. "Jana is beautiful and younger, and Bob is Bob, but you, you I worry about. You need someplace to go."

But it's hard not to think: "well, Trader Joe's, obviously!" In the movie, he would meet a younger, liberally tattooed ingenue, one of those twentysomething girls in that stage where you're grappling with what comes after precocious, and they would fall in a sort of resigned kind of love. And my friends would go see that movie, just so one of us could eviscerate it on the internet, because there has to be some way to retaliate against the uncomfortable suspicion that being young and beautiful is actually, in this economy and in life, such a necessary scam if you happen to be a female. We should all get to be as deeply pathetic as T.L. Shine!

Times Magazine Dapples Sunlight On Its Memoirist [Observer]

]]>
Wed, 28 May 2008 12:00:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011366&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Remember The Sisterhood ]]> "Did you ever think you would hear Bill O'Reilly's channel applaud Jezebel for taking a 'firm moral position'?" Uh, no. We're still in shock. Click the pic for the video. (Related: I am officially semi-obsessed with Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, if only because we disturbingly share the same views on cities and some of the deadly sins. Though I am definitely also "sloth.") [5 Resolutions.]

]]>
Fri, 23 May 2008 13:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010754&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We were a little confused after receiving ... ]]> We were a little confused after receiving an irate tip accompanied by a link to a heartwarming story about the imminent nuptials of Redskins tight end Chris Cooley to a Redskins cheerleader named Christy. Don't football players and cheerleaders go together like…whiskey and Alka-Seltzer ? Was it sentences like "Golf may have an uncountable list of ethics, though bothering a complete stranger about getting married is not one of them" that offended? Um, then we checked out the post on his personal blog. [Click the pic for a screengrab.] [Yahoo! Sports]






]]>
Thu, 22 May 2008 16:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010561&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Should You Get Plastic Surgery To Stay Competitive At The Workplace? Gordon Patzer PhD. Thinks So! ]]> gordonpatzerphd.jpgFun new trend being reported by two-thirds of plastic surgeons! People are getting it done to "remain competitive in the workplace," with eye jobs and teeth-whitening two of the most popular procedures. Hey, cheaper than going back to school and easier than learning Flash design! Maybe I should look into it? Gordon Patzer Ph.D, author of Looks: Why They Matter More Than You Ever Imagined, a book bemoaning this trend, would apparently advocate it. "It's a good investment for the workplace," he says, noting that investments that improve your physical appearance and make you appear younger can ultimately delay the decline of your workplace effectiveness as you age." Einstein and Napoleon, Patzer warns, are "exceptions, that do not disprove the rule."

Anyway. I've addressed this topic countless times, so extensively we have this tag "American Titocracy," so if you've been reading awhile you know I think that the American economy is so driven by "want creation" that all work performed by women is on some level gradually acquiring properties of sex work. Which is why I feel so adamantly that somebody needs to punch Gordon Patzer in his conventionally handsome still-boyish-at-50 face.

(Let's face it: is there anyone of whose intellect you are generally more suspicious than a really really pretty person? Later on in life, that can actually work to their advantage, since the pretty people find adoring boyfriends who will stay in while they catch up on all the reading they missed out on in high school. I know a bunch of really pretty people who have totally overcompensated in this way, to the point that I now consider it a neutral if someone is extraordinarily attractive, though there is still a lot to be said for having been ugly throughout most of your formative years.)

The point is, however, that Gordon Patzer's brand of dismayed resignation is NOT WHAT AMERICA NEEDS RIGHT NOW. The threat to American hegemony is not the superior skin and/or bone structure of the BRIC nations. (Well, Brazil maybe?) And we need our fucking science minds to stop going into plastic surgery.

How Plastic Surgery Can Help Your Career [US News]

]]>
Tue, 13 May 2008 14:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390081&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Easy Curves: The Long, Hard Object Made For Bouncing Breasts ]]> Easy Curves is a phallic piece of plastic that is supposed to make breasts higher, larger, firmer, and "more centered" (???), and is being advertised pretty regularly on TV. (Seriously, I could not get through a Top Model marathon this weekend without seeing boob commercials every few minutes.) Easy Curves is sorta like a cross between a night stick and the Thigh Master and, as you'll see in the commercial above, it makes breasts dance from side to side for a "natural look." (Despite the fact that most of the chicks in the ad are pumped full of silicone.) For just $9.99 you get the boob stick, "an exclusive guide to a sexy bustline," 10 secrets to looking your best, and essential "boost" vitamins for women. As one woman in the commercial says, "There's no greater feeling than to be able to get into a bathing suit and feel good walking down the beach." Clearly this woman does not own a good vibrator.

]]>
Tue, 06 May 2008 14:20:00 EDT Slut Machine http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387700&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Open Source Boob Project</i>: The True Story Of One Epic Day Nerds Groped Free ]]> When people first started imploring us to weigh in on the Open Source Boob Project we had this scary image of a website featuring a picture of a pair of fake tits that registered computer programmers could modify and reshape and manipulate with nanotechnology or whatever else until the resultant pair of tits reflected the internet's consensus of the ideal pair of boobs. (The consensus would, of course, change and grow over time, reflecting an anthropological study in the ever-changing depiction of breasts in the media, anime and videogames; that's how the project would get academic funding.) Anyway: why did I give the geeks so much credit? The Open Source Boob Project was actually just a consensual gropeathon that went down at PenguiCon, which is, naturally, a science fiction convention, though its genesis happened at ConFusion, another science fiction convention, when one geek, probably inspired by a booth babe, said to another geek:

I wish this was the kind of world where say, 'Wow, I'd like to touch your breasts,' and people would understand that it's not a way of reducing you to a set of nipples and ignoring the rest of you, but rather a way of saying that I may not yet know your mind, but your body is beautiful.
At which point — another "friend" spoke up. (Who is this friend? And will the blogosphere hear from her? One can only hope.
We were standing in the hallway of ConFusion, about nine of us, and we all nodded. Then another friend spoke up.

"You can touch my boobs," she said to all of us in the hallway. "It's no big deal."

Now, you have to understand the way she said that, because it's the key to the whole project. The spirit of everything was formed within those nine words - and if she'd said them shyly, as though having her breasts touched by people was something to be endured or afraid of, the Open-Source Boob Project would have died aborning. But she didn't. Her words were loud and clearly audible to anyone who walked by, an offer made to friends and acquaintances alike.

Yet it wasn't a come-on, either. There wasn't that undertow of desperation of come on, touch me, I need you to validate my self-esteem and maybe we'll hook up later tonight. There was no promise of anything but a simple grope.

We all reached out in the hallway, hands and fingers extended, to get a handful. And lo, we touched her breasts - taking turns to put our hands on the creamy tops exposed through the sheer top she wore, cupping our palms to touch the clothed swell underneath, exploring thoroughly but briefly lest we cross the line from 'touching" to "unwanted heavy petting." They were awesome breasts, worthy of being touched.

At which point the whole crew decided that an awesome tradition had been born, and next time, they would just print up buttons saying "Yes, you may!" or alternately "No, you may not."

Well, that didn't go over so well. Ferrett and his nerd cohorts were showered with outrage and mockery and virtual kicks in the balls and now he's apologized, saying what "works in a microcosm can't work in a macrocosm" and all sorts of stupid shit someone is surely saving for a screenplay on a GeekCon Rom Com about a booth babe who falls in love with a friendly hacker, because the Open Source Boob Project is seriously the funniest thing since Band Camp, unless you're the type to get offended by "double standards" or whatever, and we talked to someone who gets offended by that stuff (and also, has to actually attend science fiction conventions) and the only thing that offended her was that there were no rules for groping dudes. "I am a total repressed groper," she admitted. Me too, kinda! But um...that's what crowded bars in Williamsburg are for, right? Wait, forget I said that.

No No Ojou Chan!
Earlier: Elegy For A Booth Babe

]]>
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:40:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Meet Gonzalo Otalora, The Robin Hood Of Ugly People ]]> gonzalo_otalora.jpgI was a little skeptical when I first read about Gonzalo Otalora, a Argentinian advocate for the ugly and bestselling author of the book Feosexual, a book that, among other things, advocates taxing the attractive to help reconcile the opportunity gap that persists in rewarding the symmetrically featured with money, influence and happiness and shitting all over the dreams of the uglies. And not because his logic is somewhat screwy: "If they spend money on diets, gyms, anti-wrinkle creams and plastic surgery, surely we can wheedle even more money out of them and donate it to the ugly among us. We, the unattractive, won't squander that money because we're not compulsive consumers." (Haha, yeah, spoken like a dude.) But because the photo circulating everywhere of Mr. Otalora, taken in his pimply adolescence, is kind of cute. It shows potential. Is he just another pretty person pretending to be ugly to differentiate himself from all the "book hot" people pretending to be truly hot in the name of spreading their important humanistic messages?

Yeah, not really.

I don't speak Spanish but I am kind of in love anyway.

Tax the Beautiful [Ode Magazine]
Feosexual, The Blog
Related: In Argentina, Ugly People Strike Back
Earlier: Dear Pretty Girls Who Are Also Smart: Some Tips For Avoiding Our Antipathy

]]>
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:30:00 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377499&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Maybe It's Time To Stop Hating On America's Scary Sadshaws ]]> When I began conceiving of Jezebel, one of the first "Don'ts" on my list concerned one Julia Allison, sex columnist, media figure and self-promoter extraordinaire. Not only was Julia amply covered by Jezebel's big brother site Gawker, to me, she represented everything that was wrong with young women in the 00's. Called "Scary Sadshaws" by former Gawker editor Emily Gould, these ladies worship at the altar of Manolo Blahnik, regard writer Candace Bushnell as some sort of saint, and, of course, take instruction from a certain HBO series that bore no similarity to how life is lived by the majority of single women. Scary Sadshaws are NYC's version of the stars of Girls Gone Wild, except that Patrick McMullan is their Joe Francis, and they substitute luxury goods for bare breasts. In my mind, they were not only ruining New York, but ruining what it means to be a serious young woman with ambition in the turn-of-the-century America. They were ruining everything for all of us.

The edict against Julia was lifted once — in a stunt carried out during New York Fashion Week last September — but for the most part, no mention of her was made. Readers (most of them, no doubt, New Yorkers) wrote in unsolicited after the blog launched to request that we not mention her, which only served to underscore that I'd made the right decision in keeping her off our roster of blog-worthy media and cultural personalities. Except when I spotted her and her (admittedly adorable) white dog from afar at some media clusterfuck, in my mind, it was (almost) as if she didn't exist.

The thing is, Julia Allison and her sisters in conspicuous consumption and shameless self-promotion do exist, and it's getting harder and harder to ignore them. Their latest assault came via the NY Times' "City" section, which devoted some 2,000-plus words (and multiple four-color photographs) to Julia in a piece titled "Channeling Carrie" yesterday. My reaction to the piece was not unlike the expression shown on a woman shown standing behind Julia in a photograph taken at her 27th birthday party in NYC's West Village: a mixture of curiosity, uncertainty, discomfort and mild disgust. (Or maybe I'm just projecting.)

In the article, Julia practically crowns herself the new queen of New York narcissism: "If Carrie Bradshaw were coming to New York today," the Times quotes her as saying, "she would be me." To a Times reporter interviewing her on video for an accompanying web feature, she strikes a more humble note, explaining that being "compared to a character who has inspired a lot of women by opening herself up and questioning the issues that concern not just single people in their twenties and thirties but of all ages, that's a compliment."

Maybe so, but here's the question that no one seems to be asking regarding both Sex and the City and the Scary Sadshaws it has spawned: What important issues did the series identify and illuminate? What barriers did it break? What did the characters ("Carrie & Company") ever do for anyone outside of themselves? What, praytell, was so damn groundbreaking about a group of narcissistic rich white women with a love of shopping and gossiping about their sex lives? (Despite what Candace Bushnell thinks, the themes of no-strings-attached sex, female friendship, conspicuous consumption and social-climbing had been amply investigated long before she came on the scene.)

I'm willing to admit that it's possible the problem isn't with the Scary Sadshaws but with me — perhaps, as Julia asserts, I can aspire to be both "serious and thoughtful" while also being "shallow and frivolous", although I don't see how I'd have the time — so last night, I went online and spent $300 on a box-set of every episode of Sex and the City ever produced. (It comes in a suede cover in a hue of hot pink not unlike the plastic case covering Julia's white MacBook.) I've decided to watch all 94 episodes between now and the premiere of the Sex and the City movie on May 30 — around 12 episodes a week — in the hopes that I can embrace my inner Carrie Bradshaw and figure out what all the fuss is about (perhaps I'll even learn to like pink!). At the very least, the next time I see Julia, we'll have something to talk about...although Candace Bushnell can still kiss my middle-income black ass.

Channeling Carrie [NY Times]
Web And the Single Girl [NY Times]

Earlier: Before Sex & The City, Talking About Sex Was Practically Illegal
Julia Allison Asks: What About Fashion Makes You Want To Hurl?

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:30:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373863&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Did We Go From Riot Grrrls To Girls Gone Wild? ]]> ashley31908.jpg In yesterday's Los Angeles Times, depression diarist turned Yale law student Elizabeth Wurtzel lamented the failure of feminism in the aughts. In her typically rambling-though-insightful style, Wurtzel careened from the Spitzer scandal to Girls Gone Wild to Entourage, concluding that women are still "left choosing between, yet again, the madonna or the whore." In today's paper however, gender studies professor Hugo Schwyzer rebuts Wurtzel, reminding her that, "suggesting that feminism has failed because it hasn't eradicated misogyny is like complaining that the Civil War was for naught because racism still endures." Although Schwyzer makes a good point (and calls out Wurtzel's ever-present self-absorption), the Prozac Nation author's op-ed did get me thinking - just how did we get from the riot grrls of the early 90s to the Girls Gone Wild?Or rather, when did female sexual emancipation become not about pleasing ourselves, but about pleasing men?

Here's where Wurtzel's self-absorption is most evident, but also where she makes her strongest argument. As one of the "third wavers" of feminism who included Katie Roiphe and Susan Faludi, Wurtzel says that she and her sisters promoted "Do Me" Feminism. "I appeared topless on the cover of one of my books, a decision I stand by still," she writes. "But I don't think the idea that you could own your own orgasm was ever intended to teach college coeds that it is a good idea to spend spring break in a shower with your roommate in a motel room in Daytona Beach having a lesbian encounter for the cameras of Girls Gone Wild. That's not feminism!"

As Dodai pointed out earlier this week, Wurtzel is right: those spring breakers are not embracing feminist principles when they lose their shirts. I am not of Elizabeth Wurtzel's generation — I am of the generation that Hugh Schwyzer praises for such "optimistic" feminists as Feministing's Jessica Valenti and Amanda Marcotte — but I agree with Wurtzel that things were better in the halcyon days of the 90s.

Take the Real World as a cultural barometer. When the show debuted in 1992, there were three women on the show, Julie, Becky and Heather. Each one had career aspirations: Julie wanted to be a dancer and took classes constantly; Becky was a musician who played at clubs in the city; Heather was a rapper. The women went on dates and had both relationships and hookups, but they were not getting wasted and competing with one another for male attention. None of the three were conventionally beautiful. Flash forward to Season 19 in Sydney, Australia. Besides the young Iranian woman, Parisa, who is derided about her looks by the other female cast members, the other ladies are interchangeable bleached blondes with fake tits or empty-headed brunettes with long, flowing hair. Kelly Ann got on the show because in her audition video she stripped down to her undies, on which she had written, "Make it Hott: Pick Me!" Shauvon left the show to get back with her boyfriend, whom she had originally broken up with because he was making her choose between him and her career.

Again, the question is: what's happened in the intervening 16 years? Is it the pornification of culture because of the internet? Did we become inured to the idea of women as objects because of the Starr report? Can we blame Britney for this one? Can't we have sexual freedom without flashing a camera?

Bitter Ashes Of Burned Brassieres [Los Angeles Times]
It's Not All About Wurtzel [Los Angeles Times]
Ashley Dupre In Girls Gone Wild Video [New York Post]

Related: Some Young Women Maybe Be Confusing Confidence With Carnality
The Real World: Female Empowerment Is A Stranger To The Seven Roommates

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:00:00 EDT Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369696&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Virginia Is For Covers ]]> pasties031708.jpgHorrors! We are living in a country where adults going to strip bars might actually see nipples. That's why Delegate John A. Cosgrove has sponsored a bill in Virginia to get pasties on topless dancers. The legislation, which goes into effect in July, says a business can have its mixed-beverage license suspended or revoked if there is "entertainment commonly called stripteasing, topless entertaining, or entertainment that has employees who are not clad both above and below the waist." Actually, the law already exists and has been around for a while, but authorities did not enforce it and club owners knew they could get away with having totally topless dancers. But thanks to Mr. Cosgrove — and tax dollars — we'll never have to worry about bare areolas in Virgina again. [Reason.com]

]]>
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:45:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368601&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Plump But Not Fat" For China Looks Kinda Ana To Us ]]> In preparation for the Olympics, the Chinese government is hiring female college students to serve as "ambassadors" from each of its major cities. Would you believe appearance is apparently factoring into the hiring decisions? And it's gotten competitive: in an effort to make sure its city is remembered for the most attractive girls, Shanghai officials established a list of VERY WEIRD STRICT appearance guidelines as to who ought to be hired for the job. Recruiters were instructed to seek out girls with "elastic skin" and a "ruddy and shiny complexion." (Re the "ruddy" part =I guess they're still supposed to pretend they like, revere peasants or something in China? Jezebel Sinophiles, do you know?) Much much weirder, the rules included strict ratios governing almost all the proportions of the face, and the posession of a "plump but not fat body."

Ummmmm, so the hostesses pictured above are plump? Anyway, the best part of the story is that officials totally denied there were any physical guidelines, and a local newspaper turned around and printed the little red rulebook in detailing all the specifications, according to the blog Shanghai Scrap (The URL looks like "Shanghai is crap", which would have been a better name but still.)

really wish that I had picked up on what might be some of the weirdest Olympics news of the year, hidden - in clear view - in this sentence from Xinhua's reiteration of the Xinmin Evening News story:

It also set strict standards on facial features, including the ratio between the "width of the nose and the length of the face", "width of the mouth and width between the pupils", Shanghai's Xinmin Evening News reported.

Fans of Leonardo DaVinci and/or Dan Brown's The DaVinci Code, should/could/will recognize what's going on here: the renowned Golden Ratio - 1.618 - has been enlisted to choose Shanghai's contingent of Olympic hostesses. There's a whole lot of internet literature on the Golden Ratio and its tenuous connection to Western aesthetics, so google around if you want a deeper explanation.


Oh, please Google it. And if you happen to read Chinese...click below for the rulebook itself. We are DYING for a translation.

chinesething.jpg

Golden Ratios And Other Forbidden Fetishes Of Shanghai Bureaucrats
[Shanghai Scrap]

]]>
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:40:22 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361836&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dolly Parton Blames Tits For Postponing Tour, But Is An Eating Disorder To Blame? ]]> -1.jpg"If somebody asks me point-blank, 'Have you had plastic surgery?' it's like, well, duh," Dolly Parton tells the latest issue of Ladies Home Journal in an interview tied to the concert tour she just canceled on account of her breasts. Prescient, no? The magazine doesn't say much about Dolly's new album, Backwoods Barbie, choosing instead to spend approximately 2,398 words on her breasts (which she nicknamed "shock" and "awe.") "They do seem like public property in a way. They served me well — I don't know if I'm supporting them or they're supporting me. I've always had nice ones but of course I've had 'em jacked up a bit...I'll never graduate from collagen." But her ever-eroding frame may have trouble accomodating such a heaving bosom: though she tells the writer she's trying to gain weight, she passes up fajitas and nachos in favor of a single sour candy and looks so thin she "couldn't arm wrestle an Olsen twin," according to the writer.

Oh, Dolly, we'd expect to be having this conversation with Carrie Underwood, but not you babe! Don't you become the Amy Winehouse of 2008! Drink some milk and put some meat on the bones.

Dolly Postpones Tour, Blames Breasts [MSNBC]

dolly.jpg

]]>
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:40:53 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=355187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hate Your Well-Paying, High-Profile Job? Be A Jezebel Career Mentor! ]]> eric_workinggirl1.jpgWhen women hop jobs on Wall Street, they're much more likely to maintain their "star power" than men, a Harvard Business School study recently found. The reason was obvious, yet interesting: while men tend to achieve their standing by kissing ass within their respective firms, women look outside their firms to build their networks, in hopes of becoming the types of employees who are indispensable regardless of office politics, secure in their expertise no matter what the internal situation at the office. It totally makes sense; anyone who's ever worked in a male-dominated workplace knows it's usually a waste of time to try and become "one of the guys" when you can keep out of the bullshit and harmlessly flirt with clients instead. And without further ado, well...we're looking for someone who's learned some of these lessons — maybe even the "hard way" — to be our career advice columnist. We're not looking for writers so much as we're looking for a woman who has achieved some modicum of success in a professional field and is searching for an honest outlet to (anonymously) dispense some of her wisdom.

We'd like someone who's been around the block — hired, promoted, laid off, the works — who can be candid about the sacrifices women must make to survive professionally amidst a recession, and offer thoughtful advice as to how to dig out of crap jobs and shitty situations. We'd love it if she's given some thought of her gender as it pertains to the workplace; put another way, we're not interested in the rare woman who's worked primarily in female-dominated fields (not that there are many to speak of.) We'd love it if she shared our obsession with Julie Roehm, but that's just a pipe dream.

Know anyone who sounds like this? (It could be you, of course; we understand that Jezebel is, ahem, a must-read in a lot of professional industries. However.) Tell her to have her people call my people...or uh, anyway, email me. Think of it as a mitzvah for working womanity!

How Star Women Build Portable Skills [Harvard Business Review]

]]>
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:40:01 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349844&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The CREEP Behind <b>C</b>itizens <b>U</b>nited <b>N</b>ot <b>T</b>imid ]]> We've gotten a lot of tips about Citizens United Not Timid, the new 527 organization founded by veteran Republican strategist Roger Stone to "educate the American Public about what Hillary Clinton really is." Here's that name again. Citizens United Not Timid. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, right? Lucky for us the organization will be printing T-shirts. (And doing literally nothing else.) Well, Stone probably finds it funnier than you do, as a veteran of Nixon's 1972 Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP). But it reminded me of an old Esquire story, "Hillary Clinton Has A Sexy Mouth," written in 1999 by Tom Junod:

I was flying to upstate New York to see Hillary Clinton when I heard the Hillary joke. I had a window seat. I was reading a magazine article about her when the man next to me leaned in to my ear and in a loud, plain whisper said, "What's the Hillary Clinton KFC special?"
I put the magazine in my lap. "Okay," I said. "I give up. What is it?"
"Two small breasts, two large thighs, and two left wings."

I looked at the man. He was sitting in the middle seat and was representative of every man who has ever sat next to me in the middle seat for as long as I've been flying. He had a hearty anonymity. He was friendly to me but fatalistic — cheerfully hostile — in regard to everything else, particularly politics and the mass media. He was too big for his seat and ate his allotted bag of snack mix with a kind of puzzled, proprietary disappointment. He was an engineer in his early fifties with an imposing belly, thick forearms, reddish hands, squarish fingers, graying hair combed to the side, and a well-kept, graying beard. He was wearing aviator-style eyeglasses, a golf shirt, blue jeans, and white sneakers. He had a laptop. When I told him, with a craven and guilty chuckle, what I thought of his joke — "That's cold, man" — he shrugged, as if in noncommittal apology, and then said confidentially, "I'll bet you she has bigger balls than Bill."

I suppose the reason I hate talking about the misogyny Hillary Clinton everyone seems so fond of detecting throughout this campaign is that it reminds me of guys like this, the idea of America as a joke that's not funny anymore. I can imagine my dead grandfather, himself an engineer (though never a fat one) telling a dumb joke like that, probably while washing down a drumstick — he preferred Popeye's — with a glass of Port or Bourbon or Creme de Menthe or whatever it was he felt like abusing at the time. Like most of the things I heard him say when I got old enough that he began to see me as more aligned with his hippie pinko atheist children than his own grandfatherly good intentions, it's the sort of thing I would have dismissed as an expression of a fundamental frustration with the limits to which a life of hard work and sacrifice can make a person happy and whole, a frustration that only fermented in the abyss of retirement.

Hillary Clinton knows who she is. It's impossible to feel the same about anyone who hurls such inanities at her. Because I am not a fan of her husband, I don't support Hillary in the Democratic Primary. But good grief, I feel as though I understand her and respect her, and I can't help but feel sorry for anyone desperate or ignorant enough to deem such wholly infantile, inane put-downs worthy of her. I mean, look: in the end, not even the airplane guy did. And about those pantsuits that that have become such a staple of the Hillary-as-confused-bipolar-schizo-who-can't-come-to-terms-with-her-gender: see ladies, pantsuits just aren't as flattering as skirts. But dudes: they're so much more comfortable.

Anyway I doubt this will be the last time we write on this site about Hillary and gender and sexism and identity politics, but fuck if I don't feel depressed for all dudes every time we find ourselves drawn into this thing.

"Legendary" GOP Strategist Launches Hillary Namecalling Effort [Talking Points Memo]
Earlier: Why Is The Word Cunt Still Such A Big Deal?

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:40:00 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348756&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Miss America Contestants Continue To Shock & Awe Us With Their "Talents" ]]> missam.pngThe Miss America preliminaries continued today, with another batch of girls performing their talents for whoever the hell judges these things. Alas, there was no baton-twirling. Or Marie Osmond-esque doll-dancing. But there was a whole lotta other kinds of dancing (and if you ask us, a lot of it looked like stripping. In pointe shoes.) Dodai and I continue to comment on this year's contestants in an annotated gallery that begins after the jump.



(Click on any image to begin viewing gallery)

Earlier: Miss America Contestants Stun Us With Their Talents

[Las Vegas, Nevada; January 24. Images via Splash.]

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:00:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348695&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Miss America Contestants Stun Us With Their "Talents" ]]> missamiercatalent2.pngUnlike previous incarnations, the 2008 Miss America Pageant, taking place this Saturday night, is going to be more "modern" (read: less middle-aged lady makeup, more spunk), or so says Ugly Betty's Michael Urie of TLC's Miss America: Reality Check. But holy shit: Judging from the photos of the young women "performing" (and yes, thank you Lord, there is baton-twirling!) in the preliminary competitions in Vegas today, it doesn't look like much progress has been made. A gallery of the pageant contestants (and did I mention the baton-twirling?!), accompanied by the musings of both myself and Dodai, begins after the jump.



(Click on any image to begin viewing gallery)

[Las Vegas, January 23. Images via Splash]

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:00 EST Jennifer http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348088&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sadistic Beauty Queen Kumari Fulbright: Now Also A Bigot ]]> kamarimashup010308.jpgWe were not disposed to really liking or caring about Kumari Fulbright, that beauty queen and Arizona law student cum ALLEGED sadistic kidnapper and torturer of her ex-boyfriend. I mean, I don't care how much of a loser he was, or how much jewelry she says he took from her, or whether she was high on meth and PCP or deranged or whatevs, you don't allegedly tie someone to a chair, point guns at him and stick a butcher knife in his ear without being a bad person. Still, you know, we've been reserving judgment. Due process etc. etc. Until now. It's funny how sometimes, all it takes to solidify that sort of judgment in your head about something is a really simple, everyday gesture, like a Facebook reply to a message from a friendly blogger stalker. In this case, the blogger in question was Abovethelaw's David Lat, and Kumari's answer is just the sort of thing you'd expect from...someone utterly devoid of a conscience. (And also: a brain.)

Kumari%20Fulbright%20Facebook%20message%20exchange%20Above%20the%20Law%20blog.jpg

Charming, right? And yeah, I realize it's not necessarily her replying to that response. But doesn't it seem like something someone with an oversupply of self-esteem combined with a total dearth of morals and a basic grasp of the penal code would write?

Kumari Fulbright Gets Saucy With Us! [Above the Law]
Related: 911 Recordings From Kidnap-Torture Released

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:30:05 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fake Titstimonials: We Asked, You Answered ]]> heidi11708.jpgToday's New York Times Thursday Styles follows up its story about possibly narcissistic kids with one about narcissistic women, or rather, how breast implants, unlike diamonds, won't last forever. (Yes, we know that not all breast implant recipients are narcissists.) Dr. Linda Huang, a Denver plastic surgeon, charges $5,000 to remove implants and roughly $7,500 to replace old ones and snarks, "If they would rather spend their money on a trip to Paris than on me, then I recommend they do not have breast augmentation to begin with." The Times story reminded us of a post from the other day, on which many readers admitted to riding the silicone wave. "I got fake tits last year to correct their asymmetry [and] I feel heaps better now that I am symmetrical. I have silicone gel implants and while they are harder than natural, they aren't rocks. Just 'firm,'" said one commenter. Said another: "I had that condition where your boobs are more long than round (my Dr. said aprox 20% of women have it) and part of getting it corrected entailed getting fake boobs put in. Did wonders for my self esteem & body image, no regrets whatsoever."



And not all of you breasty babes got implants because of "conditions" or "asymmetries." "I'm 5'11 190lbs and they are 38D from a 38AA. They are proportioned and look swell," said one enthusiast. "They feel great. I Love 'em. He loves 'em. That is all." But it's not all sunshine and lollipops for women with under the skin strap-ons!

I got mine courtesy of an abusive ex boyfriend who REALLY wanted me to have them. I was against them and had previously made fun of people with them, but at the time he had me feeling about one-inch tall and also had me under the impression that he was my only friend in the world. After 4 months of mentioning it to me daily, I agreed to go to a consult just to get him to shut up about it. The doctor (also Dolly Parton & Cher's doc), was really nice, but also convinced me that I had (previously un-noticed) assymetry by an entire cup size. Long story short, the ex wanted them so bad he agreed to pay for them if I would get them - I agreed because at the time I would have done anything to make him happy (what was WRONG with me!?), and now I have fake tits. They're not so bad. If I had a ton of money, I would remove them just because of the horrible person who's suggestion this was for me to have them. But overall, they're not bad. I was blown away (horrified) by the difference in positive attention I started getting from men from the second I got my new boobs.
Oh c'mon, we're sure the attention wasn't just because of the new tatters! We bet dudes just loved gazing at you because of your great, big, round personality.

Do My Breast Implants Have A Warranty? [New York Times]

Earlier: Heidi Montag Explains What It's Really Like Having Breast Implants

]]>
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:40:00 EST Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346133&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kids Today: More Narcissistic Than Ever? I Know, It's A Tough One... ]]> Is the younger generation more narcissistic than we are? Well YEAHDUH, but here's something kind of interesting! See, two scholars are engaged in a hot dispute as to whether all the MySpace/Flickr/tumblr/silvr/U.S.AmericanTopModelChefFifthGrader shit actually causes people to be more self-obsessed. The champion of the conventional wisdom is a San Diego State psychologist who wrote a book called Generation Me and is working on another called the Narcissism Epidemic. But now a University of Western Ontario psychologist is about to publish research that suggests the youngs no more narcissistic than any of the generations that preceded them. Wait, is it kinda funny that the anti-narcissism epidemic side comes from Canada and the Generation Me author is in Southern California? A Yale professor thinks so, telling the New York Times that "exaggerated beliefs in social decline are widespread — largely because people tend to mistake changes in themselves for changes in the external world." So people who study narcissism tend to be narcissists? Crazy! But moreover, it's bigger than that:

Never before in this country has there been such an economic imperative to cultivating narcissism. "Build Brand You"! Start a blog! Advance Your Swagger! If you want a raise, dress better! Hit the gym! Assert yourselves! If you try to count on hard work alone, you'll never have any time to Make Yourself Noticed! And anyway, the immigrants and the Chinese and the Indians and the Romanians have the work ethic thing cornered. Oh what, you don't want to be the boss, the ruler, the editor-in-chief? You'd rather be a team player, and subscribe to the pitifully naive notion that the sum can be greater than parts or whatever? Did you not hear that cooperation is over? What has cooperation done for us lately? Lesssseeee...maybe designed us a really thin MacBook? Approved a half-trillion dollar war? If you've learned anything from the reality TV you watch it's that there can only be one Top Model, one Top Chef, one Celebrity Apprentice, one Biggest Loser. And yeah, you can say that's only TV. But good luck finding a decent job on an assembly line somewhere! You're better off shooting to be the next American Apparel model.


Generation Me Vs. You, Revisited [NY Times]
Related: Want A Better Job? Stop Working Right Now And Get Your Nails Did

]]>
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:00:00 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346121&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Heidi Montag Explains What It's <i>Really</i> Like Having Breast Implants ]]> heidimaxim011408.jpgThere is much we didn't know about Heidi Montag that we learned in the February Maxim (i.e. this re her album "I'm taking my time to make sure it's a classic....I want to be like Michael Jackson, Madonna, Stevie Wonder — all the greats.") But the most interesting revelation was surely this quote, re how breast implants have changed sex with (EWWW) Spencer:
I get a better ab workout now because it's like there are two weights on my chest. That makes it both easier and harder.
Ha ha, harder, such a comedienne, Heid! But seriously, this story made me realize that I'd never actually put myself in Heidi's tits before. What's it like to have the country's new most popular cosmetic surgery. Is it an around-the-clock abdominal workout? Did you know that it doesn't necessarily ruin your chances of breast-feeding? No really, Brooke Burke allegedly does it!

Seriously though, I think it's obvious what I'm doing here, Jezebreasts: fishing for your fake titstimonials; your saline solutions. Surely you have a friend who has, for whatever dumb reason, gotten fake tits. Or do you? I actually know more people who have converted to Islam than I do people who have gotten fake tits. And I know one person who has converted to Islam. Not that I am drawing comparisons, just saying.

]]>
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:30:00 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=344601&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ If You Go To Work For American Apparel, Can You Really <i>Expect</i> Dov Charney To Wear Clothes? ]]> DOV.jpgJust when you thought a day could not pass without a post on American Apparel, the best worst company in America, we get this alarming tidbit courtesy the New York Post: one of the sexual harassment cases against chronic masturbating abusive perv-with-a-heart-of-gold-lame-leggings American Apparel founder/CEO Dov Charney is going to trial. Tomorrow! Former sales manager and aggressive in-line skater Mary Nelson accuses Dov of attending a sales meeting wearing nothing but a "cock sock." Do you go to work for Dov Charney expecting him to wear clothes to meetings? Nevermind, that! The news here is that Dov Charney is so morally certain he is entitled to run his company however like a corporate embodiment of a Vice Magazine coffee table book he wants that he is eschewing the easy way out to take his case before a jury. Knowing a little bit about the case from when it was filed in 2005 — briefly, considering it's American Apparel we're talking about here, the plaintiff's story isn't that salacious — I thought I'd check back in on its progress since...

And holy itshay is it long! Just downloading the documents would probably cost ten grand. Think of the billable hours! And think of the money Dov could've saved just slipping this chick the $200K or whatever she wanted in the first place. But it isn't about the money, with American Apparel; it never was. It's about DEMOCRACY.

Check this space for our final tally on the cost of downloading the American Apparel sexual harrassment case. In fact, if you've got some free time to spare, do it yourself at the court website.

My calculator isn't strong enough for all those numbers.

UPDATE: SORRY ARGH MISTAKES WERE MADE REBOOT REBOOT.

Dirty Clothes "Suit" [NY Post]

]]>
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:30:36 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342233&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ In Bizarre Development, Elite Universities Pledge To Offer Something Called "Financial Aid" ]]> BornRich_PH611386_lg.jpgHere is something good happening in the world for once: Yale just decided to do a radical thing and actually use the billions of dollars in its coffers to actually give financial aid to students who need it. It's a very odd move, one that defies market conventions since Yale has absolutely no problem filling its classes with kids who will willingly indenture themselves at investment banks and management consulting firms for decades after graduation to pay off their tuition fees, but see, Harvard did it a few weeks ago — and one can only imagine that Princeton, whose endowment is big enough to give tuition away for the next half century or so, will follow suit. Interestingly, this news comes on the same day that New York Magazine runs a story on the problem of instilling work ethic in the children of America's 15,000 families worth more than $100 million. Most likely, you never kids from families worth $100 million before you went to college. And once in college you probably didn't see them in class! Remember Born Rich?

Luke Weil, heir to the Autotote gaming fortune, described how Brown University couldn't bring itself to kick him out because it needed his family's money—"I think I attended less than eight academic commitments"—and added that in boarding school, whenever a classmate would annoy him, he knew "I can just say, 'Fuck you, I'm from New York. I can buy your family; piss off.' "
(Whatever happened to Luke? Well, he has since worked at Bear Stearns, gone to Columbia Business School, assaulted his ex-girlfriend.) (To be fair, the story also quotes Holly Peterson, author of The Manny, claiming her billionaire father "only" subsidized her lifestyle by $600 a month in her twenties. But fuck, why be fair? Prove it, Holly.) Anyway, congratulations, normal kids who can get into Harvard and Yale and whatever other trendhumping money-soaked colleges follow suit on this plan. Trust us, realizing that the hundred laziest, most extravagantly wealthy people in your freshman dorm are the ones who will very soon control the universe is hard enough without knowing you'll be so bogged down in debt you'll have to actually go work for them when you get out.

Yale Will Increase Spending From $22.5 Billion Fund [Bloomberg]
Rich Kid Syndrome [New York]

]]>
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:30:28 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341780&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kumari Fulbright's Facebook: Don't Have Pitty, "My Only Job Is Looking Cute!" ]]> kamarimashup010308.jpgLaw blogger David Lat did a courageous thing today and "poked" the sadistic beauty queen law student Kumari Fulbright on Facebook. Hours later, she poked him back. So brave of him! And so friendly of her!! (To think a neighbor is accusing her of having acted "real impersonal" right before she allegedly went on a biting spree all over her ex-boyfriend's tied-up body.) (He also says she had "lost a lot of weight" in the weeks before the attack. Diets make us vague and cold also!) Anyway, David is not the first intrepid soul to try to contact Fulbright via social networking sites. An AP story filed this morning read:
Fulbright's phone is out of service and her apartment was unoccupied Wednesday, without any furniture. Efforts also were made to contact her through MySpace.com.
Silly "old media," no one checks MySpace more than two or three times a week these days! Anyway, without further ado, the profile gold:

Activities:"My only job is looking cute!" Favorite Quotes: "Whoever said money can't buy happiness didn't have enough money." — Kumari Fulbright "Find a guy who calls you beautiful instead of hot, who calls you back when you hang up on him, who will lie under the stars and listen to your hearbeat [sic], or will stay awake just to watch you sleep... wait for the boy who kisses your forehead, who wants to show you off to the world when you are in sweats, who holds your hand in front of his friends, who thinks you're just as pretty without makeup on, one who is constantly reminding you of how much he cares and how lucky he is to have you. Find the guy that when he's with his friends, points to you and says...that's her." — One Wise Woman
And then tell him you're going on a little excursion. Don't be scared, it's just a "shower"...

Reflections On The Facebook Profile Of Kumari Fulbright [Above the law]

]]>
Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:00:00 EST Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340317&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kumari Fulbright, the stab-happy beauty queen/law ... ]]> kumari1308.jpgKumari Fulbright, the stab-happy beauty queen/law student who was languishing in a Tucson jail for kidnapping, biting, and threatening her ex-boyfriend, is currently out on bail. Police are holding another suspect in the kidnapping, Larry Hammond, 40, but they are still looking for a pair of fugitive brothers, Robert Ergonis, 44, and Michael Ergonis, 46. The Ergonis brothers have allegedly high-tailed it to Colombia, according to the Associated Press. Fulbright is accused of biting her ex-boyfriend on the arm, hand and ear, sticking him with a butcher knife (also in the ear) and threatening to kill him. Hell hath no fury like a pageant princess scorned! Just ask Miss Puerto Rico. [MSNBC]

]]>