I went to school with a girl who had never had any cheese or bread because she was tested for allergies as a child and her mom insisted that the small, normal reaction that typically appears after the type of skin test she had meant she was allergic to... well almost everything. Keep in mind, the doctor explained that it truly wasn't a sign of a real reaction, just general irritation from the test. Unfortunately for the girl, her father had a better grasp of how the test worked but figured it wasn't worth the argument with her mom.... and let her grow up eating a severely restricted diet.
I was stunned when I learned that at 20 years old, my friend finally realized she could try pizza! Poor thing was missing out on a lot of tasty food for no good reason...
So yeah, I know many people do have real allergies, but I'm sure many more also just think they do either out of hypochondria, misunderstanding of science, or both.
A woman in my best friend's office claims that she is allergic to "fish smell." And so, no fish is allowed to be eaten on the floor that she works on.
I think that sometimes people claim to have injuries/conditions that are more severe then that person actually has just to get attention.
In addition to the normal dust/pollen stuff, I am also allergic to celery and soap. The only time I complain about my allergies is at the Kiehl's store. Outside of that, I just suck it up.
If you are not going into anaphylaxis, you can deal with a little discomfort.
@Le Coucher d'Yvette: Funny, I'm allergic to "Frat house smell" and "Looking at Ed Hardy products", which i believe are in the same subcategory of allergens as "fish smell".
I am allergic to pollen. And cedar. And basically everything that exists outdoors in my current location. It blows. But I'm luckily pretty free of food allergies. Maybe I played in dirt a lot as a child? I do get a bit bloaty when it comes to milk, so I buy Silk now. But sometimes, you must have ice cream.
I'm sure there are some people who will literally go into cardiac arrest if they eat a peanut. But others who don't have it as bad, or who have hovering and overanxious parents, aren't helping the ones who are really really allergic.
So, here's some REALLY intersting information gleaned at my latest allergy appointment, that might shed some light on some of the reasining for this (other than our increasingly hypochondriatic nation):
I recently went into for two series of allergy testing (one scratch testing session, and then one subcutaneous [in which allergens are injected just under the skin] session to the things my scratch test didn't react to), because in the past six months I have had two anaphylactic reactions to foods I have eaten regularly my whole life (and still do). During the first session, I reacted positively (my skin did) to peanuts, soy, legumes and lima beans (which, for some reason, they test separately). However, when I eat those foods I DO NOT react (I had green beans two hours ago, peanut butter last night, etc. etc.) -- my allergist classifies them as "non-symptomatic allergies."
When we were discussing this, he asked me if I'd ever had any itching in my mouth when I eat fresh foods. I do. I have been severely allergic to tree pollen and other various spring pollens since I was a baby -- in the spring I look like the "before" picture in allergy medicine ads, except I'm taking five medications. He told me that people with severe pollen allergies, like I have, sometimes react to fresh fruits and vegetables (fruits, in my case, because I am allergic to trees) because of the pollen content in and on them. It's called Oral Allergy Syndrome. There's a decent chance that my anaphylaxis wasn't anaphylaxis at all, but instead a systemic pollen reaction.
I can't even imagine how many kids have had the same kind of reaction only to have their parents cut gluten, peanuts or shellfish out of their diet. And I agree with the article as a whole:
1. You're probably not allergic.
2. If you think you are, see an ALLERGIST not a GP.
3. You have to test it out. You HAVE to eat the foods.
You know? That's all fine with me. Let the trend-jumpers think they're allergic to gluten. Maybe manufacturers will stop hiding it in so many foods if their sales drop. Every company that reformulates to drop the gluten from food makes life just that little bit easier for me - and slowly makes it cheaper to live gluten free.
I don't care if people think I'm lying to fit some mold, they're not the ones who end up crying in the restroom for hours and suffering with the rash for weeks if they mess up and eat the gluten. They can think that I'm a stuck up pretentious twit for all I care - after years of pain, I can finally close my fists and not worry about if my skin will split. And that's worth it all.
@SkittleKicks: While my best friend doesn't have celiac's disease, she is definitely gluten-intolerant. We went to a baseball game a few weeks ago and she had three crackers after not having wheat for a couple weeks, and she spent the last inning in the bathroom with cramps and diarrhea. While it's not nearly serious enough to be classified as CD, it's definitely a quality-of-life issue for her.
don't know if this has been said yet, but ladies, breast-feed your babies! it will help their immune system develop! and don't sanitize everything 24/7....kids are supposed to get dirty--it also helps build stronger immune systems. ever wonder why sick kids spend all day inside with no contact with other children?
@suth: Not all mothers can breastfeed. And a lot of children do spend plenty of time outdoors and with other children and still get sick. It's easy to blame the mothers, but often it isn't their fault at all.
Neither I nor either of my two siblings have any allergies or intolerances whatsoever.
My mom thinks it's because while we didn't grow up on farms per se, we grew up in two small farm towns. Her theory is that since we got exposed to stuff early, we built up a tolerance. (Again, I don't know how medically sound this is. Kind of makes sense, though.)
Ex-boyfriend was allergic to EVERYTHING. Or so he claimed. Really think he just didn't like my cats.
@maybeimamazed02: AAllergies don't work like that. You can only be allergic to something that you've been exposed to. That's why peanut allergy rates are low in Europe, where people don't eat as many peanuts as North Americans do, and that's why certain foods (egg yolks, peanuts) are to be avoided in the first 12 months of life, when children are more prone to develop the allergies. It's great that you're so healthy, but exposure is not the cause.
A good friend's son was just diagnosed with a peanut allergy last week. The doc however recommended regularly introducing trace amounts of peanuts to his diet (in a controlled environment), to help encourage growing out of the allergy. The doc insists that completely removing any exposure to the allergen only increases the severity of the reaction in most cases.
@MissyMcCLung:Me too. A nice counter argument to many schools' decisions to ban peanuts entirely. I for one, would have starved if my school had a ban on peanuts and peanut products, considering the fact that as a terribly picky eater, I ate a peanut butter sandwich every single day throughout elementary, middle and high school.
@MissyMcCLung: I wish he would advise the school boards here, because the allergen-free school environment we had to deal with this year was a pain in the ass. They ban many of the most high-profile allergens (including all nuts and seeds) because there are maybe one or two kids in the school with severe allergens.
There are only so many times you can send a kid to school with a meat and/or cheese sandwich before they get sick of it. And my girls are undersized--what about THEIR medical needs, eh? If I wanted to be an asshole about it, I should assert that they NEED peanut butter to gain weight and that the school is not responding to their special needs!
Alright, I wouldn't actually do that, but it irritates me that the whole school has to follow that rule for the small amount of kids. When I tried to substitute sunflower or sesame butter for the PB, I got told there's a kid that's allergic to ALL SEEDS. How is that even possible? Unless he's on a completely meat-only diet, he'd die if he wasn't in a bubble! Wait, no, not even then, because if he's that allergic, any seed-fed meat would cause a problem, too--they claim he's EXTREMELY allergic.
If your kid is actually that allergic, please homeschool him. It is not fair to demand the whole school district change for your own kid. Somebody's gotta tell these parents of speshul snowflakes that they're gonna have to deal with the real world eventually, or they're gonna melt.
@Kristinkles Ingabogovinanana: Another good counter argument is that it really hurts poor kids to ban peanuts altogether. Peanut butter is a VERY cheap and nutritious form of protein, and it hurts kids whose parents can't afford lunch meat when it gets banned.
@Cafezinha: THIS. Freshman year of college on of my friends got a roommate with sever allergies to any and all fragrances. My friend was not allowed to do her hair in the room, apply moisturizer, wear perfume, use air freshener (which she really needed, because allergy girl did not wash her sheets a single time all year, or every empty her trash). When asked why she didn't accept the medical single she was offered, she said she "wanted the roommate experience" and was so used to everyone catering to her that it didnt even cross her mind that she would be greatly inconveniencing someone else
@colormeroutine: I thought I've read somewhere that scent allergies are bunk, because there has to be a protein to react to, which there aren't in perfumes or cigarette smoke.
I can understand having an intolerance/bad reaction to smells, but not a true allergy. Can any medical Jezzies confirm/deny?
@Cafezinha: Wow. I'm really surprised the entire school went allergen free. I think it would be much more reasonable to work on a class by class basis --unless your kid's school eats communally.
@Cafezinha: I have never heard that and wouldn't know if it's true or not, but either way she should have taken the single.Just like parents who don't want their kids in the same building as certain things should keep them at home. You can't expect the whole world to bed over backwards accommodating you
@bronwynmaye: Well, they have the cafeteria where all the kids eat, but I think they eat in shifts...some grades together, some not.
They actually have a nut-free table well off to the side of the rest of the tables, and the allergic kids eat in the nurse's office by themselves anyway, so what's the point of being so strict about it?
@Cafezinha: "If your kid is actually that allergic, please homeschool him. It is not fair to demand the whole school district change for your own kid."
It's probably not a popular opinion but I completely agree. Not to mention that if my hypothetical child was that deathly allergic to things I certainly wouldn't trust anyone else to follow those rules 100% of the time.
@Cafezinha: That makes no sense (the allergen-free school, I mean). I understood in day care when certain classes had a "no peanuts" policy -- 2 and 3 year olds cannot really be trusted not to grab food off each other's plates. However, by elementary school, a nut-free table should be sufficient. That's what my daughter's school has and neither of the two peanut-allergy kids I know well has had a problem.
@Cafezinha: There was a kid in my school who was allergic to just about everything -- nuts, seeds, several kinds of vegetables, legumes, wheat, gluten, etc. etc. He went on an overseas trip that I was on one time, and carried around a card that had all his allergies listed on it that they gave out to every place we ate so they wouldn't accidentally kill him. He was a "Have-Four-Epi-Pens-On-Him-At-All-Times" kind of kid, and ate, while we were there, very literally meat and potatoes only.
I bring this up because our public schools NEVER changed SHIT for this kid. He just brought his own lunch, stayed clear of PB&J sandwiches, and survived all by himself.
working at an art school that has some kids with severe allergies I completely disagree. I think catering an entire school to a child is excessive, but as far as going on a room by room basis, thats not too much to ask. kids with severe peanut allergies already grow up sheltered more than others -they have to take their epi pens everywhere (many of the kids I work with are under 5 so we have to be prepared if they need the epi pen) and have to check the food that they are eating or might be surrounding them at all times. we have a girl whose mom comes in with stickers that say what her daughter can and can't have. i would imagine that having such a severe allergy is isolating as is, so why isolate these kids to extremes?
@Cafezinha: Scent allergies are very real. The two primary culprits are orris root (iris root, aka that flowery powdery base smell in most cheap perfumes) and lavandal (key component in lavender). My mom is massively allergic to both, as was my roommate in college.
@Cafezinha: Once upon a time (about twenty years ago), kids with severe peanut allergies were either homeschooled or sent to special ed classes with mentally disabled kids. Eventually, their parents sued, claiming their kids had the same right to the same sort of education that every other kid had.
(My mom was a special ed teacher for years, and she had a couple of kids who were very bright but allergic to nuts. It made things interesting, to put it mildly.)
@Cafezinha:
"Somebody's gotta tell these parents of speshul snowflakes that they're gonna have to deal with the real world eventually, or they're gonna melt"
I agree with you completely on this... and I grew up with a severe nut allergy at a time when no one had even heard of anaphalaxsis. Having a school-wide ban on nuts just isn't realistic. After about grd 3, my parents stopped dealing with school authorities and left it to me to deal with my allergy. So I had to come up with ideas that would keep me safe without forcing my dietary restrictions on everyone else. These skills came in really handy later on when I had roommates that loved peanut butter, had pot-lucks at the office... whatever. The bottom line is that with a school-wide ban, shy little me would probably have never learned to speak up for herself and I didn't grow up expecting people without allergies to put any effort into eating a special diet to keep me safe.
@Cafezinha: Homeschool children with allergies? Really? Just deny them the best chance at a good education, and friends, and extracurricular activies such as sports, music, and the arts, because they suffer allergies? Make those children's lives even harder? No. While a district-wide ban on nuts and seeds might be annoying, there are creative ways, millions of them, to feed a child without resorting to using nuts or seeds. Parents have become too dependant on peanuts over the last century, frankly. Yes, nut-free lunch tables or areas would make more sense. Yes, it's annoying to find meals for kids that doesn't just involve slapping goo on bread. But dig around for a day or two and you'll find tons of easy recipes for your kids.
@Cafezinha: I'm not a medical Jezzie, just sharing... I do experience itchy/watery eyes around certain perfumes, and I'm not sure why, it's only very specific ones. But I never claim to have a scent allergy, I just hold my breath when I'm around them, and I'm thinking it might be the actual chemical component of the perfumes, not the "natural" ones. I'd be interested to know if someone knows if that's true or not?
@mrsdracomalfoy: Nope, the two most pronounced allergens in fragrances are "natural": orris root and lavandal. One's from iris root, the other is from lavender. While it's tempting to blame evil fake chemicals, it's mostly the evil plants.
Wow, that's a relief. The next time a food allergen sends me into anaphylactic shock, I'll just tell myself that the LA times says it's nothing-while I suffocate.
Or, they could maybe recognize that while some people are faking or reading too jmuch WebMD, a lot of people still have serious, if not fatal, reactions to some foods and try not to be asshats about it. And that perhaps the outbreak of self-diagnoses has something to do with the lack of access to healthcare, specifically expensive specialists like allergists in this country.
@Sadie: I think the article misses that not everyone has the funds or the insurance coverage to run out and book an allergist appointment to be absolutely sure they are not the ones who don't really have an allergy. There's a reason that specialized tests like allergy tests are being read by primary care MDs-it costs less than booking specialist appts. Even if the care suffers. If it comes down to a choice between spending hundreds or thousands of $s out of pocket or just avoiding food that makes them sick, a lot of people *have to* opt for the latter. And I think the article missed that connection in a big way.
@Sadie: Yeah, I don't think so either, and I do like how this piece points out how unfair to real, serious food allergy sufferers some of the hypochondriacs or fakers can be.
Case in point-- I have a serious (i.e. past anaphylaxis, now carry epipen at all time) shellfish allergy, so when a big group goes for sushi, for example, I just ask that any shellfish rolls be on a separate platter so I don't accidentally take one, but never discourage anyone from ordering shrimp or crab rolls (though they always offer).
A friend of mine one day was like, "I'm totally using that from now on! I hate shrimp and crab, but am embarassed to say that at dinners or events, so I'm just going to lie and tell people I'm allergic". Thanks, please help feed in to the common perception among many waitstaff that we're faking it!
My brother's kid, who is about six months old now, just had a bunch of allergy tests done (the checkerboard on his back, not blood tests) and is officially allergic or unable to tolerate peanuts, gluten, and eggs. Which means no cake, no peanut butter cups, no biscuits, no cookies, and basically no good food ever. Poor kid is basically gonna be eating a vegan diet+ meat for the rest of his life.
@Dictator for Life: When I was tested, I was told that skin tests, while generally correlated with an actual food allergy, is still no guarantee either way (i.e. you can test negative, but then have a serious reaction when you actually eat the food; conversely you can test positive, but be fine eating it).
The only true way to definitively test is to do what's called a monitored food challenge. Basically you eat increasing amounts of the suspected food in the presence of medical personnel and epi on hand in case you react.
@Dictator for Life: Why did they do so many allergy tests on a six month old? I mean, my understanding is that kids that age tend to be intolerant of a lot of things, as their immune systems are still somewhat underdeveloped and not used to coping with the massive amount of stuff in the world at large. I am skeptical about such diagnoses at such a very young age, because it seems like with time and exposure most intolerance or mild allergies are grown out of.
@Atomic Bowling: He was having severe reactions to everything he ate, and he wasn't gaining any weight, and he was always sick. So the allergy test was called for, after a number of other treatments didn't get to the heart of the problem.
I had a bad aversion to some roasted cashews in Mozambique about five years ago and I haven't been able to eat them or any kind of nut since. It makes me queasy to even think about eating them. I lie to waitstaff and tell them that I'm allergic so they'll be more careful about putting them in my food. I always make sure to ask for meals sans nuts. I've had a lot of people tell me it's psychosomatic and that I'll just get over it. But honestly, like I said, it's been five years and I can't get near them without feeling nauseated. I try not to make an issue of it and simply just say "no nuts please", but then people get curious and I have to explain.
I think this upswing in people claiming to have food allergies hurts people who really do have an allergy that they need help for (people like me.) I'm allergic to something. I don't know what it is, maybe a spice or whatever, but whenever I ingest this thing I break out in hives all over my body about a half an hour later. Last time it was so bad my lips & eyelids swelled up (I've lived with these reactions all my life and I always say as long as my eyes, nose, mouth & throat don't swell, I'm fine. I pop a Benedryl or three and stay home until it goes away.) I went to an allergist and when I told him what happens he told me that there is no way that what I descibe could be happening. He was convinced that my body had just "decided" (that's the word he used) to get hives on dozens of separate occasions. Did I mention this man had a Harvard Medical School class ring on? He ran a blood test on me instead of a pin prick test, too. I refused to go back to see him again. The only thing I want to know is what I'm allergic to so I can avoid eating it. It's not like I eat something and my stomach hurts, I swell up like a balloon and it itches like hell. I wonder if that doctor treated me the way he did because he sees so many people claiming to have allergies?
@Sev: You may want to find a doctor who uses alternative medicine along with traditional medicine. There is a lot of focus on food allergies and food sensitivities in the alternative medical community.
There is a test called ELISA/ACT that is used by every doctor I've gone to who uses alternative medicine. This is a blood test that looks for food sensitivities, and it was incredible what it discovered. My constant nausea went away when I cut out the foods I was sensitive too, and they test for way more than traditional allergy tests.
@Sev: Please go see a different (and hopefully much better) allergist. This guy sounds like a moron. If you are having anaphylactic reactions, there should be no argument about it, just an interest in finding out the cause.
You know, as someone who is truly, TRULY allergic to many things (seriously guys - I had to have watermelon with holes drilled in it for candles for my school bdays instead of cupcakes, and my allergist and I are still on fantastic terms despite the 400+ testing shots he's given me over the years), people pretending to have allergies pisses me off.
1. People don't believe me when I tell them I can't eat almonds because I'm allergic to them. "Why aren't you allergic to ALL nuts then?" Because almonds are in the PEACH family. It's a POLLEN allergy. They correspondingly don't believe I'm allergic to petroleum, food dye, fragrances, etc.
2. Allergies and food sensitivities ARE two truly different things. And yes, they do wax and wane as you grow. When I was little I couldn't have red food dye without going Hulk style on everyone. Now, I can tell I've had too much red dye because I get irrationally angry/annoyed, but it's manageable.
3. I would wish food sensitivities on NO ONE. As a proud vet of the "Caveman Diet" for my ENTIRE childhood, there's a reason I now deal with the minor inconveniences of a constant headache and decreased energy to eat food I'm still slightly allergic to. Because it was GOOD. And once you're deprived, you understand.
A girl once went on an hour long diatribe about how she had Celiac's and couldn't eat gluten. During this diatribe, she ordered and ate a hamburger (with bun, mind you) and a basket of bread.
@Notes from the underwhelmed: When I was a waitress in college, I had this raging bitch of a customer insist on speaking to the chef to ensure nothing she ate came anywhere near gluten because she had "Celiac's." Then for dessert she ordered a fucking souffle. Yes, bitch, that shit is made with flour, and no, it is not Celiac's if you're just on a diet.
07/20/09
I was stunned when I learned that at 20 years old, my friend finally realized she could try pizza! Poor thing was missing out on a lot of tasty food for no good reason...
So yeah, I know many people do have real allergies, but I'm sure many more also just think they do either out of hypochondria, misunderstanding of science, or both.
07/20/09
I think that sometimes people claim to have injuries/conditions that are more severe then that person actually has just to get attention.
In addition to the normal dust/pollen stuff, I am also allergic to celery and soap. The only time I complain about my allergies is at the Kiehl's store. Outside of that, I just suck it up.
If you are not going into anaphylaxis, you can deal with a little discomfort.
07/20/09
07/20/09
I'm sure there are some people who will literally go into cardiac arrest if they eat a peanut. But others who don't have it as bad, or who have hovering and overanxious parents, aren't helping the ones who are really really allergic.
07/20/09
I recently went into for two series of allergy testing (one scratch testing session, and then one subcutaneous [in which allergens are injected just under the skin] session to the things my scratch test didn't react to), because in the past six months I have had two anaphylactic reactions to foods I have eaten regularly my whole life (and still do). During the first session, I reacted positively (my skin did) to peanuts, soy, legumes and lima beans (which, for some reason, they test separately). However, when I eat those foods I DO NOT react (I had green beans two hours ago, peanut butter last night, etc. etc.) -- my allergist classifies them as "non-symptomatic allergies."
When we were discussing this, he asked me if I'd ever had any itching in my mouth when I eat fresh foods. I do. I have been severely allergic to tree pollen and other various spring pollens since I was a baby -- in the spring I look like the "before" picture in allergy medicine ads, except I'm taking five medications. He told me that people with severe pollen allergies, like I have, sometimes react to fresh fruits and vegetables (fruits, in my case, because I am allergic to trees) because of the pollen content in and on them. It's called Oral Allergy Syndrome. There's a decent chance that my anaphylaxis wasn't anaphylaxis at all, but instead a systemic pollen reaction.
I can't even imagine how many kids have had the same kind of reaction only to have their parents cut gluten, peanuts or shellfish out of their diet. And I agree with the article as a whole:
1. You're probably not allergic.
2. If you think you are, see an ALLERGIST not a GP.
3. You have to test it out. You HAVE to eat the foods.
07/20/09
I don't care if people think I'm lying to fit some mold, they're not the ones who end up crying in the restroom for hours and suffering with the rash for weeks if they mess up and eat the gluten. They can think that I'm a stuck up pretentious twit for all I care - after years of pain, I can finally close my fists and not worry about if my skin will split. And that's worth it all.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
My mom thinks it's because while we didn't grow up on farms per se, we grew up in two small farm towns. Her theory is that since we got exposed to stuff early, we built up a tolerance. (Again, I don't know how medically sound this is. Kind of makes sense, though.)
Ex-boyfriend was allergic to EVERYTHING. Or so he claimed. Really think he just didn't like my cats.
07/20/09
07/20/09
I thought it was interesting and logical advice.
07/20/09
07/20/09
There are only so many times you can send a kid to school with a meat and/or cheese sandwich before they get sick of it. And my girls are undersized--what about THEIR medical needs, eh? If I wanted to be an asshole about it, I should assert that they NEED peanut butter to gain weight and that the school is not responding to their special needs!
Alright, I wouldn't actually do that, but it irritates me that the whole school has to follow that rule for the small amount of kids. When I tried to substitute sunflower or sesame butter for the PB, I got told there's a kid that's allergic to ALL SEEDS. How is that even possible? Unless he's on a completely meat-only diet, he'd die if he wasn't in a bubble! Wait, no, not even then, because if he's that allergic, any seed-fed meat would cause a problem, too--they claim he's EXTREMELY allergic.
If your kid is actually that allergic, please homeschool him. It is not fair to demand the whole school district change for your own kid. Somebody's gotta tell these parents of speshul snowflakes that they're gonna have to deal with the real world eventually, or they're gonna melt.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
I can understand having an intolerance/bad reaction to smells, but not a true allergy. Can any medical Jezzies confirm/deny?
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
They actually have a nut-free table well off to the side of the rest of the tables, and the allergic kids eat in the nurse's office by themselves anyway, so what's the point of being so strict about it?
07/20/09
It's probably not a popular opinion but I completely agree. Not to mention that if my hypothetical child was that deathly allergic to things I certainly wouldn't trust anyone else to follow those rules 100% of the time.
07/20/09
07/20/09
I bring this up because our public schools NEVER changed SHIT for this kid. He just brought his own lunch, stayed clear of PB&J sandwiches, and survived all by himself.
07/20/09
working at an art school that has some kids with severe allergies I completely disagree. I think catering an entire school to a child is excessive, but as far as going on a room by room basis, thats not too much to ask. kids with severe peanut allergies already grow up sheltered more than others -they have to take their epi pens everywhere (many of the kids I work with are under 5 so we have to be prepared if they need the epi pen) and have to check the food that they are eating or might be surrounding them at all times. we have a girl whose mom comes in with stickers that say what her daughter can and can't have. i would imagine that having such a severe allergy is isolating as is, so why isolate these kids to extremes?
07/20/09
07/20/09
(My mom was a special ed teacher for years, and she had a couple of kids who were very bright but allergic to nuts. It made things interesting, to put it mildly.)
07/20/09
"Somebody's gotta tell these parents of speshul snowflakes that they're gonna have to deal with the real world eventually, or they're gonna melt"
I agree with you completely on this... and I grew up with a severe nut allergy at a time when no one had even heard of anaphalaxsis. Having a school-wide ban on nuts just isn't realistic. After about grd 3, my parents stopped dealing with school authorities and left it to me to deal with my allergy. So I had to come up with ideas that would keep me safe without forcing my dietary restrictions on everyone else. These skills came in really handy later on when I had roommates that loved peanut butter, had pot-lucks at the office... whatever. The bottom line is that with a school-wide ban, shy little me would probably have never learned to speak up for herself and I didn't grow up expecting people without allergies to put any effort into eating a special diet to keep me safe.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
Or, they could maybe recognize that while some people are faking or reading too jmuch WebMD, a lot of people still have serious, if not fatal, reactions to some foods and try not to be asshats about it. And that perhaps the outbreak of self-diagnoses has something to do with the lack of access to healthcare, specifically expensive specialists like allergists in this country.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
Case in point-- I have a serious (i.e. past anaphylaxis, now carry epipen at all time) shellfish allergy, so when a big group goes for sushi, for example, I just ask that any shellfish rolls be on a separate platter so I don't accidentally take one, but never discourage anyone from ordering shrimp or crab rolls (though they always offer).
A friend of mine one day was like, "I'm totally using that from now on! I hate shrimp and crab, but am embarassed to say that at dinners or events, so I'm just going to lie and tell people I'm allergic". Thanks, please help feed in to the common perception among many waitstaff that we're faking it!
07/20/09
07/20/09
The only true way to definitively test is to do what's called a monitored food challenge. Basically you eat increasing amounts of the suspected food in the presence of medical personnel and epi on hand in case you react.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
There is a test called ELISA/ACT that is used by every doctor I've gone to who uses alternative medicine. This is a blood test that looks for food sensitivities, and it was incredible what it discovered. My constant nausea went away when I cut out the foods I was sensitive too, and they test for way more than traditional allergy tests.
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
07/20/09
1. People don't believe me when I tell them I can't eat almonds because I'm allergic to them. "Why aren't you allergic to ALL nuts then?" Because almonds are in the PEACH family. It's a POLLEN allergy. They correspondingly don't believe I'm allergic to petroleum, food dye, fragrances, etc.
2. Allergies and food sensitivities ARE two truly different things. And yes, they do wax and wane as you grow. When I was little I couldn't have red food dye without going Hulk style on everyone. Now, I can tell I've had too much red dye because I get irrationally angry/annoyed, but it's manageable.
3. I would wish food sensitivities on NO ONE. As a proud vet of the "Caveman Diet" for my ENTIRE childhood, there's a reason I now deal with the minor inconveniences of a constant headache and decreased energy to eat food I'm still slightly allergic to. Because it was GOOD. And once you're deprived, you understand.
07/20/09
Priceless.
07/20/09