<![CDATA[Jezebel: Airbrushing]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/jezebel.com.png <![CDATA[Jezebel: Airbrushing]]> http://jezebel.com/tag/airbrushing http://jezebel.com/tag/airbrushing <![CDATA[ French (Photo Retouchers) Don't Let Famous Women Get Fat ]]> drewvogue050508.jpgRemember the horror of that almost-unrecognizable atrocity at left? Turns out we can blame Pascal Dangin for that. Dangin, you see, is what writer Lauren Collins, in this week's issue of the New Yorker, calls "the premier retoucher of fashion photographs", a onetime hairdresser who so believes in reincarnation (symbolic, not metaphysical) that, when he moved from France to the U.S in 1989, he chose the first very flight out of Charles de Gaulle airport on the very first day of the new year.

Many women are transformed by Dangin's computer stylus, which sits in a basement laboratory at "Box", his four-story, Manhattan Photoshop fortress: In addition to Drew, there is the trophy wife with the "flat" face and "short" legs; the shoulder blade found "in a recent project at W"; the cast of the Sopranos; Prada models; "a famous actress in her late twenties"; a "crunchy"-faced model; "another well known actress"; "an actress with a movie coming out this spring"; Kate Moss; models Liya Kebede and Raquel Zimmerman; Madonna. And then there is model Christy Turlington, who, Collins explains, "needs the least help".

Collins, interestingly (purposefully?) glosses over Dangin's flaws as adeptly as he reshapes a model's nasiolabial folds. Her interview subjects, she explains, liken him to "a translator, an interpreter, a conductor, a ballet dancer articulating choreographed steps". (She compares his work to that of painters Jasper Johns and John Currin; he is, she later explains solemnly, "savantlike".) Collins also seems almost resolutely disinterested in exploring Dangin's role in perpetuating unrealistic standards of beauty and when a photograph ceases to be a photograph and becomes, what Redbook editor Stacy Morrison once said, "an image": most of the critics and/or experts of photo manipulation Collins quotes are all long-dead; the only living people she does quote are all fans of Dangin; and she all but skips over the news that Dangin retouched Dove's "Campaign for Real Beauty" advertisements. And when she finally gets around to asking Dangin about the work he does and how it affects and defines those aforementioned standards of beauty, she follows his explanation — "I'm just giving the supply to the demand" — with a cynical parenthetical announcing, "fashion advertisements are not public-service announcements." (Yeah, tell that to Newsweek's Jessica Bennett, who put up this story on Friday, quoting a NYC stylist as saying "those young kids looking at the magazines, they're dreaming of something that doesn't exist.")

The work Dangin does, has, not surprisingly, made him very rich. (He owns homes in Manhattan, the Hamptons, and St. Bart's; in addition to the cover portrait of Barrymore, Dangin, with the help of favorite Photoshop tools as the smudge brush, the warping tool, and the clone stamp, retouched — or "tweaked" — 107 advertisements and 36 fashion photographs in the March 2008 issue of Vogue alone.) It has also, interestingly, made him somewhat of a god among the egotistical, easily-unimpressed bigwigs in the fashion and photography industries, who defer to his whims without a second thought. His list of clients is both impressive and iconic: Steven Meisel, Patrick Demarchelier; Annie Leibovitz ("Just by the fact that he works with you, you think you're good"); Inez and Vinoodh; Craig McDean, who says he gives Dangin "carte blanche" to basically do whatever he wants. Whether Dangin enjoys all the adulation and deference that comes his way, Collins does not make clear (nor does she explore the fact that from the photographers to the photo retouchers to the art directors, images of women in fashion magazines are manipulated and decided upon by men before they ever appear before a female fashion editor's eyes.) As for the things Dangin doesn't enjoy — on the women whose photographs he alters, that is — they include the following: ropy blue veins; bony temples; fleshy chins; bumps of all sorts; big knees; "slumpy" legs; bad pores. Oh, and of course, fat asses.

Several days later, Demarchelier returned to the studio to continue winnowing images for the show. The conversation turned to which shot to include of another well-known actress.


"I like her in this one, because she looks very natural," Dangin said.

"Yes," Demarchelier agreed. "In that other pose, she looks like an actress."

"But she's also very good here," Dangin said, of a shot that showed her partially nude.

"Yes, she's very beautiful in that position. Do you want to cut it?"

"No, no. I'm going to keep it for the ass," Dangin said.

"Maybe we could redo the ass."

"Yes, the ass is quite heavy."

Pixel Perfect [The New Yorker]

Related: Picture Perfect [Newsweek]

Earlier: Photoshop of Horrors
Vogue Cover Girl Drew Barrymore Has Been Powerfully Photoshopped
Our Fifteenth Minute: That Faith Hill Photo Wasn't Actually A Photo, Redbook Editor Explains

]]>
Jezebel-386922 Mon, 05 May 2008 12:00:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386922&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PhotoShop Of Horrors ]]> haydensmall043008.jpgPoor Hayden Panettiere is no stranger to PhotoShop. And though it's not immediately apparent just what the problem is, something is clearly amiss with her body in this Candie's ad (as seen in this week's In Touch.) Specifically: Her legs. Evidence shows that they are not made of plastic. So why does this ad make them look like Barbie doll stems? Also, her shins appear to be as long as her entire arm. Which, anatomically, doesn't seem right. (Click to see larger.)





hayden043008.jpg

]]>
Jezebel-385823 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385823&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PhotoShop Of Horrors ]]> kim_airbrushed042908.jpgAwful Plastic Surgery has a side-by-side comparison of Kimberley Stewart on the beach and in a lingerie ad. While her body is similar, it is not the same. Click the picture for a larger view. [Awful Plastic Surgery]







kim_airbrushedBIG04908.jpg

]]>
Jezebel-385179 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:40:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385179&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Liz Hurley Loves Getting Airbrushed To Be "Thinner" & "Younger" ]]> lizhurleybikini042108.jpgAnother week, another airbrushing (mis)adventure. "Shooting bikinis is now my life, which as you can imagine is unmitigated hell," says Elizabeth Hurley, who has her own line of swimwear. "But if you signed on for the gig, sadly, you have to go and be jolly in a skimpy white bikini. So now I rely on nice photographers and a certain amount of retouching. I don't mind if you want to make me a bit thinner and a bit younger." In fact, Liz touches up her own snapshots — pictures of her husband, Arun Nayar and son Damian. "Everytime I download my holiday snaps I go over them," she claims. As always, Ms. Hurley is on-trend, because "airbrushing is here to stay," writes Nat Ives for Ad Age. Of Glamour magazine's treatment of America Ferrera, Ives claims "An actually ugly Betty just wouldn't be good for anyone's business, even if it might represent something relatable." But when it comes to magazine covers, is controversy is a good thing?

When Stephanie Faucher, the design director of Computerworld, was questioned by Folio magazine about the infamous Lebron James image on the cover of Vogue, she answered with her own question: "What better way to sell magazines than to run a controversial cover?"

Except that Folio reports, controversial covers don't always increase sales. Though, writes Joanna Pettas, "It's nice to hear people outside the industry talking about magazines. It's a reminder that print, and magazines in general, still have an impact on social culture." Still, one has to wonder: If women are tired of airbrushed celebs and "perfect" models, and a magazine really wanted to court controversy, wouldn't it be a good idea to publish an untouched cover photograph? I'd buy that, in a heartbeat. Would you?

Liz Hurley Admits She Gets Her Bikini Pictures Airbrushed [Mirror]
Liz Hurley Confesses Love Of Airbrushing [Telegraph]
Why Ridiculous Covers Matter [Folio]
Despite Talk of Ethics Codes, Airbrushing Is Here to Stay [AdAge]
Related: Cover Critique: Vogue's Lebron and Gisele
Earlier: America Ferrera's 'Glamour' Treatment, Revisited
Is Vogue's "LeBron Kong" Cover Offensive?
Mainstream Media Outlets Have Picked Up On The Controversial "LeBron Kong" Vogue Cover

]]>
Jezebel-382170 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EDT Dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382170&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ British Fashion Council Discovers Airbrushing, Becomes Appalled ]]> ferreramashup2122107.jpgThe British Fashion Council, the governing board behind London Fashion Week, has come out against the overuse of airbrushing in England's magazines. (Dear BFC: we could have told you about this a long time ago.) BFC reps tell the Telegraph that it is writing a letter to the British Society of Magazine Editors and others about "digitally-enhanced body images and the part it plays in magazines in perpetuating an unachievable aesthetic." The Council is also concerned that the health guidelines for models that they recommended earlier this year are "not being implemented." The Guardian says that "the recommendations include a ban on models under the age of 16 and non-smoking and drug free backstage environments."



English fashion authorities aren't the only international groups getting upset about the current state of the celebrity-industrial complex. The Women's Forum in Australia released a report in August called Faking It: The Female Image in Young Women's Magazines. And guess what they found? The tyranny of perfection perpetuated by women's magazines makes everyone hate themselves!!

Considering the fashion industry's widespread apathy about anorexia (according to the Guardian, Karl Lagerfeld said the models just had "skinny bones"; Dolce & Gabbana said that anorexia had "nothing to do with fashion"), it's hard to believe that the BFC's suggestions will be truly heard. But who knows? Maybe at some point a faux-celebrity's photographed cellulite won't cause a major media outcry. Fingers crossed!

Magazines criticised for airbrushing models [Telegraph]
Model health recommendations 'not being implemented' [Guardian]

Earlier:
Here's Our Winner! 'Redbook' Shatters Our 'Faith' In Well, Not Publishing, But Maybe God
Breaking News: Jennifer Love Hewitt Is A Human Being
America Ferrera's Glamour Treatment, Revisited

]]>
Jezebel-336897 Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:30:00 EST Jessica http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336897&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kelly Ripa's Adventures in Airbrushing ]]> kellybellysmall112107.jpgIf you saw Kelly "Ripped" Ripa on the May cover of Shape magazine, you saw her flat flat stomach, punctuated with an "innie" belly button. But Kelly's belly actually sports an outie. According to this week's Life & Style, Kelly's real belly button can be seen on the December cover of Fitness. Question: Why the fuck would you photoshop a navel? (Click the picture to see a side-by-side view.)

kellybellylarge112107.jpg

]]>
Jezebel-325582 Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:00:00 EST dodai http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325582&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ America Ferrera's 'Glamour' Treatment, Revisited ]]> Left, America Ferrera on the October 2007 cover of Glamour. At right, Ferrera at the Creative Arts Primetime Emmy Awards on Saturday.

[Emmy Awards image via Splash]

]]>
Jezebel-297987 Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297987&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kelly Clarkson Has Junk In The Trunk (And Other Things We Already Knew) As Confirmed By A Professional Retoucher ]]>
Veteran Jezebel readers may remember how we once offered $10,000 of our boss's money for an original unretouched cover photo from a glossy magazine. [The offer still stands! We're just waiting for the money shot, people!-Ed.] Well, it looks like professional celebrity virtual liposuctor Ivan Palaez wants our boss to save his money and give it all to us, because we are both broke and kind of satiated after procrastinating extensively over his portfolio of those cool morphing Flash images of pretty-to-ugly celebs. In the video above, he explains the art of turning perfectly pretty photographs of the merely glamorous into the impossibly glowy virtual reality images that keep us company in the subway. The weirdest part is how much he fucks with their freaking postures. On the site, visual evidence that stars are a little more like us than we think! (Specifically, in the pores and mid-section!) Click Kelly Clarkson, Brittany Murphy and Naomi Watts first... if, of course, you're the sort of person who loves a little schadenfreude now and again.

IWANEXstudio.com

Earlier: Unretouched Cover Photos Wanted

]]>
Jezebel-270285 Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:21:40 EDT Moe http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=270285&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It's Amazing What Kids These Days Can Do With A Computer And The Cover Of 'Playboy' ]]>
Video. Woman gets turned into stunning beauty via Photoshop. Going to get coffee.

Playboy Evolution Made By Photoshop [YouTube]

]]>
Jezebel-266603 Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:29:08 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266603&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How To Lose 100 Pounds In 4 Minutes Or Less ]]>
Photoshoping A Big Girl into A Model - Click Here for more great videos and pictures!
In what can only be described as a less professionally-done (but no less effective) response to Dove's famous Evolution Of Beauty video, someone has created a video showing how technology can make a sample size model out of a plus-sized one... in just a few quick minutes.

Photodropping 100 Pounds Away From This Model [Back In Skinny Jeans via Dethroner]
Related: Evolution Of Beauty — Dove Campaign For Real Beauty [YouTube]

]]>
Jezebel-264224 Tue, 29 May 2007 15:33:51 EDT Anna http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264224&view=rss&microfeed=true