<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jezebel: Sociology]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jezebel.com/tag/sociology</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Jezebel posts tagged Sociology]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women" href="http://jezebel.com/number-crunching/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">numbercrunching</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women" href="http://jezebel.com/5774275/the-funnest-factoids-from-the-white-house-report-on-women" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women" alt="Click here to read The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/03/small_0302womencount.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				There may be <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/white-house-issues-report-on-women-in-america/?partner=rss&emc=rss">no new studies</a> in the just-released <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/Women_in_America.pdf">White House Report on Women</a>, but that doesn't mean there's nothing to learn from the report, which conveniently culls all relevant government data on women. That includes some breakdowns of things we've been hearing about for awhile &mdash; women's education attainment contrasting with the pay gap &mdash; and a few little surprises. Some highlights, here.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5774275/the-funnest-factoids-from-the-white-house-report-on-women" title="Click here to read more about The Funnest Factoids From The White House Report On Women">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5774275/the-funnest-factoids-from-the-white-house-report-on-women]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5774275]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Number Crunching]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Factoids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[White house report on women]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:02:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5774275&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever" href="http://jezebel.com/i-thee-dread/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">itheedread</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever" href="http://jezebel.com/5650274/the-recession-hates-marriage-weddings-more-than-ever" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever" alt="Click here to read The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2010/09/shutterstock_61788154.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				According to new census data, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/28/national/main6908056.shtml">marriage rates</a> in 2009 were the lowest they've been in a century.  Why? It's the economy, stupid. Well, that, and the Wedding Channel.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5650274/the-recession-hates-marriage-weddings-more-than-ever" title="Click here to read more about The Recession Hates Marriage, Weddings More Than Ever">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5650274/the-recession-hates-marriage-weddings-more-than-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5650274]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[i thee dread]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weddings]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5650274&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &quot;Family&quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &amp;quot;Family&amp;quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People" href="http://jezebel.com/we-are-family/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">wearefamily</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &amp;quot;Family&amp;quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People" href="http://jezebel.com/5638587/disturbing-percentage-of-americans-believe-family-includes-dogs-but-not-gay-people" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &amp;quot;Family&amp;quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People" alt="Click here to read Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &amp;quot;Family&amp;quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2010/09/kids_all_right915.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A new study shows that for some 30% of Americans, pets can be considered family. But not so much for gay partners.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5638587/disturbing-percentage-of-americans-believe-family-includes-dogs-but-not-gay-people" title="Click here to read more about Disturbing Percentage Of Americans Believe &quot;Family&quot; Includes Dogs, But Not Gay People">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5638587/disturbing-percentage-of-americans-believe-family-includes-dogs-but-not-gay-people]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5638587]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[We Are Family]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gay couples]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gay couples with children]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lgbt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Unmarried couples]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna North]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5638587&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[We're Not Immature, We're &quot;Emerging Adults&quot;]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read We're Not Immature, We're &amp;quot;Emerging Adults&amp;quot;" href="http://jezebel.com/kids-today/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">kidstoday</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read We're Not Immature, We're &amp;quot;Emerging Adults&amp;quot;" href="http://jezebel.com/5616005/were-not-immature-were-emerging-adults" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read We're Not Immature, We're &amp;quot;Emerging Adults&amp;quot;" alt="Click here to read We're Not Immature, We're &amp;quot;Emerging Adults&amp;quot;" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2010/08/twentysomethings818.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				One psychologist thinks twentysomethings who are marrying, procreating, and starting careers later than their parents are inhabiting a new life stage called "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #emergingadulthood" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #emergingadulthood" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/emergingadulthood/">emerging adulthood</a>."  But do today's young people really need a special term to define them?				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5616005/were-not-immature-were-emerging-adults" title="Click here to read more about We're Not Immature, We're &quot;Emerging Adults&quot;">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5616005/were-not-immature-were-emerging-adults]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5616005]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Kids Today]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adulthood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Career]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Emerging adulthood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[growing up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Grown-Up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey jensen arnett]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Life Stages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Robin marantz henig]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:12:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna North]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5616005&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure" href="http://jezebel.com/merch/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">merch</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure" href="http://jezebel.com/5588857/when-a-women-went-grocery-shopping-in-search-of-adventure" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure" alt="Click here to read When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2010/07/6a00d83542d51e69e20134856c3c99970c-800wi"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a href="http://longstreet.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83542d51e69e20134856c3c99970c-pi"></a>These sales-happy customer relations images from a  modern food merchandising catalog (<em>Modern Merchandising</em>, 1939) come at an interesting time in the history of eating &mdash; or lesser yet, the history of buying food.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5588857/when-a-women-went-grocery-shopping-in-search-of-adventure" title="Click here to read more about When Women Went Grocery Shopping In Search Of Adventure">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5588857/when-a-women-went-grocery-shopping-in-search-of-adventure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5588857]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Merch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women meat]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John  Ptak]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5588857&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations" href="http://jezebel.com/i-thee-dread/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">itheedread</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations" href="http://jezebel.com/5350404/research-on-marrying-women-will-definitely-lead-to-sweeping-generalizations" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations" alt="Click here to read Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2009/09/507678.1020.A.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Perhaps in response to all the recent talk about the female imperative for mate-poaching - or perhaps coincidentally - today's "Science Times" brings <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/science/01angi.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss">a piece by Natalie Angier</a> suggesting that women are <em>also</em> prone to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SERIAL MARRIAGE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SERIAL MARRIAGE" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/serial-marriage/">serial marriage</a>.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5350404/research-on-marrying-women-will-definitely-lead-to-sweeping-generalizations" title="Click here to read more about Research On Marrying Women Will Definitely Lead To Sweeping Generalizations">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5350404/research-on-marrying-women-will-definitely-lead-to-sweeping-generalizations]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5350404]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[i thee dread]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Alpha males]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fact-finders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marriage works usa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[natalie angier]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Serial marriage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350404&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kissin' Cousins]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" href="http://jezebel.com/kissing/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">kissing</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" href="http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" alt="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2009/01/TheKiss2.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				U.S.: One kiss. France: Two. Netherlands: 3. In today's "<a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/who-changes-the-kissing-rules/">Freakonomics</a>," Daniel Hamermesh asks, who makes the kissing rules? Who changes them? How do we learn them? And we'd better! [<a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/who-changes-the-kissing-rules/">New York Times</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins" title="Click here to read more about Kissin' Cousins">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5127753]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Kissing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interaction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5127753&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Undercover]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Undercover" href="http://jezebel.com/the-secret-life-of-syrian-lingerie/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">thesecretlifeofsyrianlingerie</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Undercover" href="http://jezebel.com/5075023/undercover" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Undercover" alt="Click here to read Undercover" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2008/11/Bra_Set.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A new book, <em><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f323cf4-a6ea-11dd-95be-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">The Secret Life of Syrian Lingerie</a></em> is a sociological study that seeks to examine the history and culture of undies, and by extension, a society in transition. The authors find that the more religious the area — and correspondingly, conservative women's outerwear — "the more risqué the underwear." And the lingerie itself is worthy of study, "an outrageous mixture of kitsch and creativity: thongs are adorned with fake birds – 'bird’s nest' (ish al-asfour) is the slang for women’s pubic hair – or even the red rose of martyrdom, symbol of Hizbollah; bras are emblazoned with 'I love you' in Arabic and play tunes when squeezed."  This lighthearted approach to sexuality is exactly the kind of truth the authors hope to illuminate. As one puts it, "modernity is the process of removing the fig leaf from our contradictions.” [<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f323cf4-a6ea-11dd-95be-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">FT</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5075023/undercover" title="Click here to read more about Undercover">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5075023/undercover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5075023]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[The Secret Life of Syrian Lingerie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lingerie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Underwear]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5075023&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[
The old adage that men marry their mothers...]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read " href="http://jezebel.com/mommie-dearest/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">mommiedearest</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read " href="http://jezebel.com/388103/" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read " alt="Click here to read " src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2008/05/small_lucill5708.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The old adage that men marry their mothers has some <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSN0647129420080507">truth</a> to it, according to some scientists who study this sort of thing. Researchers at the University of Iowa have discovered that "If a man's mother is highly educated, chances are the woman he marries will have a similar education," <em>Reuters</em> reports. They surveyed men in their 20s and 30s who earned salaries in the top 10% for their age group and found that 80% of men whose mothers had college degrees married women with college degrees.  Sociologist Christine Whelan, the co-author of the study, told <em>Reuters</em>, "For an increasing number of these men ... when they make their own choices about someone who they think will be a good wife in the future or a good mother, they go back to their role models." [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSN0647129420080507">Reuters</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/388103/" title="Click here to read more about 
The old adage that men marry their mothers...">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/388103/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-388103]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mommie dearest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Christine Whelan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[university of iowa]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 May 2008 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica G.]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=388103&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!" href="http://jezebel.com/exclusive%21/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">exclusive!</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!" href="http://jezebel.com/373004/who-actually-buys-bottega-veneta-we-ask-a-girl-who-actually-owns-one" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!" alt="Click here to read Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/11/84d1c53a9e3324a5afcbc451c8045017.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				There is a totally made-up <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/fashion/27BOTTEGA.html">story</a> in today's <em>New York Times</em> about Bottega Veneta. <em>You</em> know Bottega. They make those basketweave-y leather bags. Unless you <em>don't</em> know Bottega, in which case now you know the source of all the noxious superiority fumes whenever you're in the realm of one of the carriers of one of those basketweavy bags. Well, here's the "trend": The idea is that Bottega's bags are getting popular because they are more "understated" than flashy Louis Vuitton bags, and people are sick of logos. You know, the basketweave, it is not quite like a <em>logo.</em> No one knows where it's from. Until they do. And then they recognize it everywhere they see it. So it's like a logo, but subtler. Plus, you can't knock it off! So people <em>know</em> you spent a lot of money. Sort of like with a logo, if all the people who stole other people's logos were rounded off and thrown in Guantanamo Bay like God intended. Seriously though. I have known about Bottega since 2006, when I took a press trip to Hong Kong, on which a publicist was hellbent on acquiring a knockoff...<em>Bottega Veneta</em>. <br   />				<a href="http://jezebel.com/373004/who-actually-buys-bottega-veneta-we-ask-a-girl-who-actually-owns-one" title="Click here to read more about Who Actually Buys Bottega Veneta? We Ask A Girl Who Actually Owns One!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/373004/who-actually-buys-bottega-veneta-we-ask-a-girl-who-actually-owns-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-373004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bottega Veneta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conspicuous Consumption]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Expensive Shit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moe]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=373004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

