But frankly, going on to state that the Qur'an and Sharia prescribes flogging rather than death seems to be a judgment call based upon your interpretation of sharia - which is a sticky wicket because obviously others disagree with that interpretation and feel stronger punishment is in order. For you to state that you know the correct interpretation of sharia is a bit presumptuous at best when it is in direct conflict of how many Islam scholars interpret the law.
This is what you need to know about me; any interpretation is fine, what you choose to believe and practice is your choice. In this case, that appears to be that your god believes a person is subject to corporal punishment in one fashion or another for adultery. I do not follow Islam for a host of reasons, chief among them the same reasons I am not a Christian, but that doesn't mean I begrudge anyone else's beliefs. But just as you may judge me or my religion (Goddess worship/ neo-Pagan, for what it's worth and so you may fairly judge) for practices with with you disagree, I also judge yours. Not condemn, necessarily, but form a strong opinion.
In this case, just as mohamedvz2001 feels that stoning is a just and equitable form of punishment, and you feel that the Qur'an has laid out several "outs" for adultery... the devil is in the details. ie. somewhere in between.
Basically, unless two people are fucking in the town square or one of them admits to it, you can't prove adultery. You just get a divorce and go about your life.
Right, but if you did drop your knickers and confess, you clearly deserve to die. Perfectly reasonable.
You don't? As in, you find it to be a relatively fair, just, thoughtful method of death for adultery? (I am avoiding the argument over whether adultery merits death, that is none of my concern, thank the pagan gods I worship.)
She's checking to make sure you haven't found any better berries or nuts, guaranteed.
Sounds like it might get dangerous if it's all hunter-manly-macho instead.