Also, Ugly Betty is full of strong, diverse female characters.
@girlscoutcookie: Yeah, Roz is a good one. I lurve her.
But really - the only thing I got from this move of Katherine Heigl's is that she's...unbelievably stuck-up?
A bit OT, I guess, but another thing kind of along the same topic here... I was watching the special features on my 3rd Rock From the Sun DVDs and John Lithgow kept going on about how Sally was a "big, strong man stuck in a beautiful woman's body". Even though the characters apparently were genderless before coming to Earth. Yeah, that irritated me to no end.
Also, casting a 250-pound, middle-aged Princess Elisabethe in Don Carlos was kind of a bad move on the part of the COC this year...
Like with movies, TV, plays, etc. it makes sense for directors to have a say in what type of person is appropriate for a role, but Voigt seems to have been treated incredibly disrespectfully. And basically forcing some one to get a gastric bypass to save their job is pretty fuckin low, even for show business.
The campaign itself is kind of "meh", but...I mean, come on.
@redheadedstepchild: Right, 'cause that is totes the point.
We still haven't really shaken off winter up here.
Integration is a good thing!
I'm a 34 DDD (though I don't have it as bad as the girls in this video!), and I dream of Bs. Any time I hear a girl with As whine about not being able to fill out a top, I want to smack her about the head. Honestly. I mean, at least the bitch can buy a shirt - since most clothes seem to be made for emaciated transvestites.
What makes me the most bitter is I would have been smokin' 200 years ago! (And despite horrible crushing of organs, I bet corsets give you damn good support.) Grrr...
Though she does not seem to actually have done any acting for a long time? Aside from, like, that movie about assassins or something that's coming out?
But then again, it involves *gasp* thinking and applying information as needed, not just following one formula 100% of the time. And that's not to hate on formula-loving folks, but I am tired of hearing about how fields involving personal input and analysis at the most fundamental level (design, history, psychology, etc.) are somehow not "hardcore". Most of the people I know who love to brag about their mad math and chemistry skills can't get through a page of James Joyce without asking what the hell is going on, and use "well, it's ART, it's not ACADEMIC" as an excuse.
I know many girls just don't care for the maths and sciences (I am one of them!), but I have trouble believing that gender roles have nothing to do with it - I've found that creativity and analysis is often encouraged more in girls, since we're supposed to be all "emotional" and whatnot. And since creativity extends way past drawing and poetry, maybe we're just trained to enjoy application and analysis (the "human factor", I guess?) more from an early age. And why should that be considered a negative thing? Or are we looking at a case of "feminine = bad"? As always?
Sorry for the long post, but it's something I think about often enough.
I'm getting sick of this story.
Also, if these people were atheists, there's no way this shit would be allowed to continue. Or if it was, like, one 60 year guy who'd knocked up a fourteen year old. But, of course, if God said it was okay...
Does any one else think it's kind of a disservice to tell kids their best bet in life is "fast food management"? Then again, our whole Career Studies course was designed to convince us to forego University and become construction workers. No hate on construction workers, but why would you tell kids it's "foolish and unrealistic" to pursue post-secondary studies? 'Course, we were all way too elitist and materialistic to fall for such "truths"...
Also, does any one else think the kid looks kinda depressed? Or maybe she's just trying her best to ignore the paps.
So, uh, yes - we have Hell's Angels up here. And I must say, this whole business is a step up from shaking their hands and welcoming them to the fucking city...Mel.