<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jezebel: Ny Press]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jezebel.com/tag/ny press</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Jezebel posts tagged Ny Press]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Getting Dumped]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Getting Dumped" href="http://jezebel.com/maghag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Getting Dumped" href="http://jezebel.com/5011660/getting-dumped" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Getting Dumped" alt="Click here to read Getting Dumped" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2008/05/d4/c5/small_2006c6039c992de4535d4de87ed2b110.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The cover of this week's <em>New York Press</em>  features the legs of the <em>Sex And The City</em> characters coming out of garbage cans. The reviewer "trashes" the movie, get it? But yeah. Treating women like toxic waste, so funny. A tipster points out that the image is similar to an <a href="http://www.esquire.com/cover-detail?year=1967&month=2">old</a> and incredibly sexist <em>Esquire</em> cover. Are we <em>regressing</em> in our depiction of women? (Click the picture to see both covers.) [<a href="http://www.nypress.com/">NY Press</a>, <a href="http://www.esquire.com/cover-detail?year=1967&month=2">Esquire</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5011660/getting-dumped" title="Click here to read more about Getting Dumped">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5011660/getting-dumped]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5011660]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Covers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[NY Press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 14:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5011660&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

