<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jezebel: Magazines]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jezebel.com/tag/magazines</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Jezebel posts tagged Magazines]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor" href="http://jezebel.com/assholes/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">assholes</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor" href="http://jezebel.com/5881333/lad-mag-suggests-guys-get-rapey-because-odds-are-in-their-favor" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor" alt="Click here to read Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2012/02/small_7eaa5f6b813fe9d99add70b510197806.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Remember how it's <a href="http://jezebel.com/5866602/can-you-tell-the-difference-between-a-mens-magazine-and-a-rapist">hard</a> to tell the difference between British lad mags and rapists? Well, it's especially tough when said mags actually tell their readers to rape women. Which was apparently online mag UniLad's idea of a funny joke.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5881333/lad-mag-suggests-guys-get-rapey-because-odds-are-in-their-favor" title="Click here to read more about Lad Mag Suggests Guys Get Rapey, Because Odds Are in Their Favor">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5881333/lad-mag-suggests-guys-get-rapey-because-odds-are-in-their-favor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5881333]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Assholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lad Mags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rape jokes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sexual Assault]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Unilad]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna North]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5881333&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep Cosmo from their Children]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; from their Children" href="http://jezebel.com/cosmopolitan/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">cosmopolitan</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; from their Children" href="http://jezebel.com/5873837/fun+hating-parents-petition-to-keep-cosmopolitan-from-their-children" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; from their Children" alt="Click here to read Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; from their Children" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2012/01/small_069da83c81c0459722e9c94b569d6c18.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				A totally lame group of fun-hating parents demanding their children's minds be shielded from hypersexual content have banded together to petition that <em>Cosmopolitan</em>, the best magazine to read if you'd like to be sexually judged in airports, be concealed in the checkout area of their local supermarkets.   Where's a girl got to put a scrunchie in order to get some fearless fun around here?!				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5873837/fun+hating-parents-petition-to-keep-cosmopolitan-from-their-children" title="Click here to read more about Fun-Hating Parents Petition to Keep Cosmo from their Children">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5873837/fun+hating-parents-petition-to-keep-cosmopolitan-from-their-children]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5873837]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Concerned parents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ftc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Moms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Petitions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Gloria Ryan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5873837&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her Cosmo Debut]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; Debut" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; Debut" href="http://jezebel.com/5872848/17+year+old-dakota-fanning-makes-her-cosmo-debut" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; Debut" alt="Click here to read 17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her &lt;em&gt;Cosmo&lt;/em&gt; Debut" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2012/01/small_ad127d59ae8c5b1a132538f295fc3209.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				We've all watched Dakota Fanning grow up, and though she won't be 18 until next month the folks at <em>Cosmo</em> simply couldn't wait to put her on the cover of the magazine with the line, "His Best Sex Ever" near her head. Fanning's appearance on the cover isn't really all that scandalous. She's a freshman at NYU, and Miley Cyrus was considered an appropriate choice for the cover of women's magazines when she was <a href="http://jezebel.com/5200475/at-16-miley-cyrus-is-still-a-girl-and-yet-a-woman">just 16</a>. However, <em>New York Magazine</em> <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2012/01/dakota-fanning-covers-cosmo.html">notes</a> that the cover story "Welcome to Your Cosmo Years, Dakota" creepily lists ways to tell she's quite the adult, and the caption on a photo of Dakota in bunny ears reads, "Two years ago this would have been cute. Now it's hot." Ironically, you aren't really a woman until editors decide it's okay to portray you in a sexy, infantilizing manner.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5872848/17+year+old-dakota-fanning-makes-her-cosmo-debut" title="Click here to read more about 17-Year-Old Dakota Fanning Makes Her Cosmo Debut">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5872848/17+year+old-dakota-fanning-makes-her-cosmo-debut]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5872848]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:35:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5872848&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?" href="http://jezebel.com/rag-trade/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">ragtrade</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?" href="http://jezebel.com/5871278/what-a+list-faces-sold-the-most-magazine-covers-in-2011" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?" alt="Click here to read What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/12/small_7dfa9b1fbe630b4f5792e39b64b2a4f1.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				2011 is already over in magazine-land, where January '12 issues are filling up newsstand shelves. This allows us to ask, and answer, the hard questions, like: did people buy a catastrophic number of magazines with <strong>Kim Kardashian</strong>'s face on them this year, or just a distressingly high one? And what's the deal with <strong>Sarah Jessica Parker</strong>, anyway? SJP proved a reliable cover subject on <i>Elle</I>, <i>Vogue</I>, and <i>Marie Claire</I>, earning each magazine its second- or third-bestseller of the year. <strong>Kim Kardashian</strong> had <i>Glamour</I> and <i>Cosmopolitan</I>'s bestsellers, but on the front of <i>Harper's Bazaar</i>, <i>Self</I>, and <i>Lucky</i>, Kim's face elicited only average sales. <i>Women's Wear Daily</I> reports that "a source said that her January 2012 <i>Glamour</I> cover with sisters<strong> Khloé </strong>and <strong>Kourtney</strong> is on track to fall below 400,000 sales &mdash; <strong>a really poor performance</strong>." Peering into the American id by way of magazine-buying habits has its interesting findings: people like <strong>Mark Sanchez </strong>more than they do <strong>Derek Jeter</strong>. They don't like <strong>Reese Witherspoon</strong>, but they do like<strong> Gwyneth Paltrow</strong> &mdash; just not on the cover of <i>Bon Appetit</i>. <strong>Heidi Klum</strong> did well, and so did <strong>Mila Kunis</strong>, who delivered 15% above-average sales for <i>W</I> and 10% above-average for <i>Cosmopolitan</I>. But people hate <strong>Justin Timberlake</strong> on a cover: with Mila, he had the fourth-best <i>Elle</I> of the year, but alone, he was <i>Esquire</I>'s worst seller. Also unwanted on magazine covers in 2011: <strong>Justin Bieber</strong>. Nobody bought Bieber's <i>Vanity Fair</I> &mdash; it was the third-worst selling issue not only of the year, but of editor Graydon Carter's entire tenure &mdash; and his <i>Rolling Stone</i> sold 5% below average. Maybe all of those Beliebers who buy up multiple copies of his albums should show a little love to their local newsagent? And <strong>Lady Gaga</strong> had both the third-best and the third-worst <i>Harper's Bazaar</I> issues of the year (May being best and October being worst). Either people were all like, 'Wait, we just got a <I>Harper's Bazaar</I> with this lady's face on it, what gives?' or they prefer Gaga with makeup and weird facial prosthetics. (Her October cover was au naturel.) [<a href="http://www.wwd.com/media-news/media-features/newsstands-best-and-worst-sellers-of-2011-5441321?module=today">WWD</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5871278/what-a+list-faces-sold-the-most-magazine-covers-in-2011" title="Click here to read more about What A-List Faces Sold The Most Magazines In 2011?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5871278/what-a+list-faces-sold-the-most-magazine-covers-in-2011]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5871278]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Rag Trade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kim kardashian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lady gaga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Round-up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sarah Jessica Parker]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Sauers]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5871278&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lindsay's Playboy Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Lindsay's &lt;em&gt;Playboy&lt;/em&gt; Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop" href="http://jezebel.com/lindsay-lohan/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">lindsaylohan</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Lindsay's &lt;em&gt;Playboy&lt;/em&gt; Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop" href="http://jezebel.com/5869181/lindsays-playboy-issue-is-either-a-bestseller-or-a-flop" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Lindsay's &lt;em&gt;Playboy&lt;/em&gt; Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop" alt="Click here to read Lindsay's &lt;em&gt;Playboy&lt;/em&gt; Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/12/small_47b62221971350b0233d0c3ad13e397b.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				After Lindsay Lohan's entire <em>Playboy</em> pictorial leaked online, Hugh Hefner decided to release the issue <a href="http://jezebel.com/5866906/hugh-hefner-says-hell-release-linsday-lohans-playboy-issue-early-just-in-time-for-christmas">early</a>. So how are sales? Well, the mag either "falls flat with consumers," or is "on fire." TMZ <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/12/18/lindsay-lohan-playboy/#.Tu561kr7KiK">reports</a>:				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5869181/lindsays-playboy-issue-is-either-a-bestseller-or-a-flop" title="Click here to read more about Lindsay's Playboy Issue Is Either A Bestseller Or A Flop">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5869181/lindsays-playboy-issue-is-either-a-bestseller-or-a-flop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5869181]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playboy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5869181&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!" href="http://jezebel.com/shitness/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">shitness</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!" href="http://jezebel.com/5868054/fitness-advice-follies--go-easy-on-the-cake-fattie" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!" alt="Click here to read Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/12/small_5a31acf3c1765fc67c367526b196f30d.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Have you ever felt like women's health and fitness magazines seem to be addressing an audience that consists of unfrozen cavewomen from another planet who don't know anything of the ways of the earth-people?  You're not alone.  Today's inaugural entry in Fitness Advice Follies&mdash; the dumping ground for obvious, confusing, or terrible diet and exercise advice&mdash; addresses a topic near and dear to all of our hearts:  cake.  Specifically, is cake delicious?				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5868054/fitness-advice-follies--go-easy-on-the-cake-fattie" title="Click here to read more about Fitness Advice Follies:  Go Easy on the Cake, Fattie!">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5868054/fitness-advice-follies--go-easy-on-the-cake-fattie]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5868054]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Shitness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['Health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fitness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fitness advice follies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Gloria Ryan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5868054&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of Vogue]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/5867149/decrepit-meryl-streep-is-the-oldest-woman-to-ever-grace-the-cover-of-vogue" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;" alt="Click here to read Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/12/small_fd5acd51b94ef5dfc353ac6ca5e81e51.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Were you aware that we live in a world in which Blake Lively has been on the cover of <em>Vogue</em> twice while Meryl Streep hasn't made a single appearance? Well, no more. <em>Vogue</em> has released the cover of its January issue, which features Streep (along with some groundbreaking jacket-wearing methods). Inside the 62-year-old <a href="http://omg.yahoo.com/news/meryl-streep-covers-vogue-magazine-first-time-050307977.html">says</a> that when she was offered three different witch roles after turning 40, she felt it meant older women were "grotesque on some level" and told her husband, "It's over." The Associated Press notes that she "jokes in the magazine she's the 'oldest person'" to appear on the cover, but it's true. Priscilla Presley was 59 when she posed for the magazine <a href="http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_2757017/vogue-magazine-united-states-august-2004/">in 2004</a>, but she shared the cover with her daughter and granddaughter. Streep has appeared in international editions of <em>Vogue</em>, but in 2010 the <a href="http://jezebel.com/5709601/the-year-in-vogue-what-did-we-see">average age</a> of cover models in the American magazine was only 33.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5867149/decrepit-meryl-streep-is-the-oldest-woman-to-ever-grace-the-cover-of-vogue" title="Click here to read more about Decrepit Meryl Streep Is The Oldest Woman To Ever Grace The Cover Of Vogue">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5867149/decrepit-meryl-streep-is-the-oldest-woman-to-ever-grace-the-cover-of-vogue]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5867149]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Meryl Streep]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5867149&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Is Carey Mulligan's Vogue Cover On The New Issue Of French Elle?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why Is Carey Mulligan's &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Cover On The New Issue Of French &lt;em&gt;Elle&lt;/em&gt;?" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why Is Carey Mulligan's &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Cover On The New Issue Of French &lt;em&gt;Elle&lt;/em&gt;?" href="http://jezebel.com/5866201/why-is-carey-mulligans-vogue-cover-on-the-new-issue-of-french-elle" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why Is Carey Mulligan's &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Cover On The New Issue Of French &lt;em&gt;Elle&lt;/em&gt;?" alt="Click here to read Why Is Carey Mulligan's &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Cover On The New Issue Of French &lt;em&gt;Elle&lt;/em&gt;?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/12/small_1d3b36b0325f2c1bcf6660f5c474ce24.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Fashionista has <a href="http://fashionista.com/2011/12/carey-mulligans-october-2010-vogue-cover-is-now-on-the-cover-of-french-elle-how-did-this-happen/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fashionistacom+%28Fashionista%29">spotted</a> a magazine mystery that will put those skills you developed while reading <em>Highlights</em> to good use. On the right we have Carey Mulligan's October 2010 <em>Vogue</em> cover, and on the left is the November 2011 issue of <em>Elle</em> France. The two covers obviously used the same photo, though it seems like the images may have been tweaked slightly in Photoshop. Mulligan's left arm, eye makeup, and smile look a bit different, but it's possible it's a scanner issue.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5866201/why-is-carey-mulligans-vogue-cover-on-the-new-issue-of-french-elle" title="Click here to read more about Why Is Carey Mulligan's Vogue Cover On The New Issue Of French Elle?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5866201/why-is-carey-mulligans-vogue-cover-on-the-new-issue-of-french-elle]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5866201]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Carey mulligan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[french elle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5866201&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?" href="http://jezebel.com/photoshop-of-horrors/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">photoshopofhorrors</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?" href="http://jezebel.com/5863412/will-a-formalized-scale-for-photoshopping-do-any-good" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?" alt="Click here to read Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/11/small_e1b986d85a1ea123be58804985541505.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				At this point, we know that most, if not all, of the commercial, non-news images we see are digitally enhanced. Still, studies show that women &mdash; of all sizes &mdash; feel bad and/or think negative thoughts about their bodies after viewing pictures of models in magazine ads for just three minutes. And many magazine readers are not yet women; they are girls, with still-developing physiques, self-esteem and brains. Yet extensive Photoshopping persists. But what if you could measure just how much a photograph had been altered? Would it help in countering the effect of these misleading images? We may find out: A proposal for a program is in the works.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5863412/will-a-formalized-scale-for-photoshopping-do-any-good" title="Click here to read more about Will A Formalized Scale For Photoshopping Do Any Good?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5863412/will-a-formalized-scale-for-photoshopping-do-any-good]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5863412]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop of horrors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5863412&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By Women's Health [UPDATED]]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By &lt;em&gt;Women's Health&lt;/em&gt; [UPDATED]" href="http://jezebel.com/photoshop-of-horrors/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">photoshopofhorrors</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By &lt;em&gt;Women's Health&lt;/em&gt; [UPDATED]" href="http://jezebel.com/5862083/amber-heards-organs-scooped-out-by-womens-health" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By &lt;em&gt;Women's Health&lt;/em&gt; [UPDATED]" alt="Click here to read Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By &lt;em&gt;Women's Health&lt;/em&gt; [UPDATED]" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/11/small_0a03920216b55b33cd0c0dede07005a5.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Finally, we've found a magazine that doesn't lie to its readers with its cover lines. Yes, Amber Heard's torso looks strangely whittled on the <a href="http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/64525342.html">cover</a> of <em>Women's Health</em>, but the editors clearly labeled the image "Sculpt Sexy Curves." As in, you can't achieve this look from this month's silly diet and exercise tips, you'll need to digitally sculpt this silhouette in Photoshop.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5862083/amber-heards-organs-scooped-out-by-womens-health" title="Click here to read more about Amber Heard's Organs Scooped Out By Women's Health [UPDATED]">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5862083/amber-heards-organs-scooped-out-by-womens-health]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5862083]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop of horrors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Amber Heard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[women's health]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:35:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5862083&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside People Offices]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Offices" href="http://jezebel.com/hey-girl/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">heygirl</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Offices" href="http://jezebel.com/5860710/heroes-protest-ryan-gosling-losing-sexist-man-alive-title-outside-people-offices" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Offices" alt="Click here to read Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside &lt;em&gt;People&lt;/em&gt; Offices" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/11/small_cc2db624fd393a163002c904514216b2.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				In the spirit of the DASH store vigil for Kim Kardashian's marriage, today a massive crowd of Ryan Gosling fans (okay, about 12 people) gathered outside <em>People</em> magazine headquarters to <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/ryan-gosling-fans-protest-outside-people-magazine">protest</a> the editors' decision to <a href="http://jezebel.com/5860032/foxy-francophile-bradley-cooper-anointed-sexiest-man-alive">name</a> Bradley Cooper 2011's Sexiest Man Alive. When we last checked, the year was not 2009 and <em>People</em> wasn't a publication that caters exclusively to 14-year-old boys. The folks behind <em>Time</em> Person Of The Year should take this as a warning. Sure, Steve Jobs changed the world and stuff, but Ryan Gosling fans will be vindicated.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5860710/heroes-protest-ryan-gosling-losing-sexist-man-alive-title-outside-people-offices" title="Click here to read more about Heroes Protest Ryan Gosling Losing 'Sexiest Man Alive' Title Outside People Offices">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5860710/heroes-protest-ryan-gosling-losing-sexist-man-alive-title-outside-people-offices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5860710]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hey girl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ryan Gosling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ryan gosling protest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sexiest Man Alive]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:08:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5860710&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper" href="http://jezebel.com/5859155/let-us-mourn-the-dead-trees-involved-in-the-all+new-tabloid-magazine-just-for-reality-stars" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper" alt="Click here to read New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/11/small_964bf4d96358141f3a21967773e9e1a1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Sales of tabloid magazines have been floundering for quite some time, and <em>Ok!</em> was hemorrhaging money until it was sold this summer. So, how do you maximize profits at a time when we're saturated with celebrity gossip and people are buying fewer magazines in general? Create a <em>brand new</em> magazine that follows the petty, producer-instigated arguments and Walmart excursions of America's least talented stars! <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5859155/let-us-mourn-the-dead-trees-involved-in-the-all+new-tabloid-magazine-just-for-reality-stars" title="Click here to read more about New Reality-Show-Only Tabloid Promises To Waste Unprecedented Amounts of Paper">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5859155/let-us-mourn-the-dead-trees-involved-in-the-all+new-tabloid-magazine-just-for-reality-stars]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5859155]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Reality weekly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5859155&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body" href="http://jezebel.com/body-image/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bodyimage</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body" href="http://jezebel.com/5853981/these-ads-are-trying-to-sell-you-on-the-notion-of-loving-your-body" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body" alt="Click here to read These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/10/small_whenwillyoustop_sharper.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The South African edition of <em>Marie Claire</em> put together a "body issue," and asked ad agencies to come up with concepts where the thing being advertised is loving your body. An interesting twist from a ladymag &mdash; usually such publications are blamed for fostering low-self esteem in women.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5853981/these-ads-are-trying-to-sell-you-on-the-notion-of-loving-your-body" title="Click here to read more about These Ads Are Trying To Sell You On The Notion Of Loving Your Body">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5853981/these-ads-are-trying-to-sell-you-on-the-notion-of-loving-your-body]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5853981]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:09:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5853981&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself" href="http://jezebel.com/5843748/martha-stewart-magazine-plagiarizes-itself" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself" alt="Click here to read Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/09/small_martha1-popup.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				While flipping through this year's Halloween issue of <em>Martha Stewart Living</em>, Mary Findley realized she'd seen this image before. While it would have been tremendously easy to switch the icing to white, swap the bat decorations for ghosts, and change the caption to "ghoulishly good," the editors decided to run the exact same "scarily sweet" cake that was pictured in the 2008 issue. The <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/business/media/martha-stewarts-halloween-magazine-brings-fan-a-surprise.html?ref=todayspaper">notes</a> that publications repurpose content all the time &mdash; the problem is there's no indication in the magazine that many of the articles are republished.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5843748/martha-stewart-magazine-plagiarizes-itself" title="Click here to read more about Martha Stewart Magazine Plagiarizes Itself">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5843748/martha-stewart-magazine-plagiarizes-itself]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5843748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Martha Stewart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[martha stewart living]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5843748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read" href="http://jezebel.com/5833480/lady-mags-push-readers-to-go-online-even-while-they-read" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read" alt="Click here to read Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/08/small_triptico_1314088056476.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Many magazines are having a hard time attracting readers to their websites, so they're trying a new approach. Rather than just listing urls and hoping people will look them up online, magazines are becoming littered with mobile codes. The hope is that while readers don't care enough to look up an editor's blog, they'll bother to hunt down QR codes and snap them with their cell phones.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5833480/lady-mags-push-readers-to-go-online-even-while-they-read" title="Click here to read more about Lady Mags Push Readers To Go Online Even While They Read">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5833480/lady-mags-push-readers-to-go-online-even-while-they-read]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5833480]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Appic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Glamour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile codes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qr codes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5833480&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Italian Vogue Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]" href="http://jezebel.com/racism/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">racism</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]" href="http://jezebel.com/5833054/italian-vogue-features-unbelievably-racist-slave-earrings" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]" alt="Click here to read Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/08/small_screen_shot_2011-08-21_at_7.17.53_pm.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The <em>Vogue</em> brand is no stranger to offensive missteps. In the past we've seen French <em>Vogue</em> do <a href="http://jezebel.com/5381556/french-vogue-must-not-think-blackface-is-that-offensive">blackface</a>, American <em>Vogue</em> portray LeBron James as <a href="http://jezebel.com/368655/is-vogues-lebron-kong-cover-offensive">King Kong</a>, and Indian <em>Vogue</em> put a <a href="http://jezebel.com/5044233/vogue-india-puts-fendi-bib-on-impoverished-child-critics-freak">Fendi bib</a> on an impoverished child. However, <em>Vogue</em> Italia always seemed a bit more enlightened than its sister publications. Just three years ago, the magazine put out its first <a href="http://jezebel.com/5024967/italian-vogues-all-black-issue-a-guided-tour">"all black" issue</a>, which (while not without its questionable moments) did more than any other edition to push for more diversity in fashion.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5833054/italian-vogue-features-unbelievably-racist-slave-earrings" title="Click here to read more about Italian Vogue Features Unbelievably Racist 'Slave Earrings' [Updated]">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5833054/italian-vogue-features-unbelievably-racist-slave-earrings]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5833054]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vogue italia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue italia slave earrings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue slave earrings]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5833054&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read 13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read 13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App" href="http://jezebel.com/5827114/13-things-we-learned-from-the-cosmo-for-guys-ipad-app" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read 13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App" alt="Click here to read 13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/08/small_cosmoforguys_splash.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				As we now know, <em>Cosmopolitan</em> <a href="http://jezebel.com/5826835/cosmo-for-guys-launches-men-instantly-question-bedroom-skills">just launched</a> an iPad-only magazine called <em>Cosmo For Guys.</em> It's like <em>Cosmo</em>, but … uh, for guys. As card-carrying guys ourselves, we took a look and learned a few things.<!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5827114/13-things-we-learned-from-the-cosmo-for-guys-ipad-app" title="Click here to read more about 13 Things We Learned From The 'Cosmo For Guys' iPad App">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5827114/13-things-we-learned-from-the-cosmo-for-guys-ipad-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5827114]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmo for guys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Modern Man]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5827114&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Seventeen Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Seventeen&lt;/em&gt; Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Seventeen&lt;/em&gt; Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them" href="http://jezebel.com/5827173/seventeen-informs-girls-that-boys-are-probably-lying-to-them" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Seventeen&lt;/em&gt; Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Seventeen&lt;/em&gt; Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/08/small_emma-watson-seventeen-august-2011-02.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The Awl has been reading the August issue of <em>Seventeen</em> for some reason and <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2011/08/teen-girl-mag-prepares-for-life-of-disappointment-lies">spotted</a> this gem:  A column called "LIES He Tells You Straight To Your Face." Maybe it's best that girls learn they can't trust anything guys say, from basic facts about their lives to their love of kittens. It paves the way for <em>Cosmo</em> to scare them them into thinking men are lying about what they want in bed and in all likelihood, sleeping with their best friend.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5827173/seventeen-informs-girls-that-boys-are-probably-lying-to-them" title="Click here to read more about Seventeen Informs Girls That Boys Are Probably Lying To Them">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5827173/seventeen-informs-girls-that-boys-are-probably-lying-to-them]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5827173]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Seventeen boys lie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Seventeen Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Aug 2011 09:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5827173&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community" href="http://jezebel.com/born-this-gay/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">bornthisgay</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community" href="http://jezebel.com/5818237/lady-gaga-considers-herself-part-of-the-lgbt-community" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community" alt="Click here to read Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/07/small_gagacover7511.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Lady Gaga has <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/the-new-issue-of-rolling-stone-the-rise-of-lady-gaga-20090527">openly discussed</a> her physical attraction to women in the past, but in a new <a href="http://news.advocate.com/post/7263991145/lady-gaga-portrait-of-a-lady">interview</a> for the August issue of <em>The Advocate</em>, Gaga says firmly that she is not just a gay activist, but is an actual member of the LGBT community. "The b letter," she said.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5818237/lady-gaga-considers-herself-part-of-the-lgbt-community" title="Click here to read more about Lady Gaga Considers Herself Part Of The LGBT Community">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5818237/lady-gaga-considers-herself-part-of-the-lgbt-community]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5818237]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Born this gay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lady gaga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lady gaga lgbt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the advocate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracie Egan Morrissey]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5818237&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian Vogue: &quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&quot;]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&amp;quot;" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&amp;quot;" href="http://jezebel.com/5816282/plus+size-model-on-plus+size-issue-of-italian-vogue-we-need-fashion-to-catch-up-to-women-of-size" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&amp;quot;" alt="Click here to read Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&amp;quot;" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/06/small_italianvogue628.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Earlier this month, <a href="http://jezebel.com/5807901/not-one-not-two-but-three-plus+size-models-land-cover-of-italian-vogue">three plus-sized models</a> landed the cover of <em>Vogue</em> Italia. Velvet d'Amour &mdash; the plus-sized actress, model and photographer who famously walked the runway at the Jean Paul Gaultier show in Paris in 2006 &mdash; has some thoughts about the issue, and the fact that the women aren't actually wearing much in the way of fashion.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5816282/plus+size-model-on-plus+size-issue-of-italian-vogue-we-need-fashion-to-catch-up-to-women-of-size" title="Click here to read more about Plus-Size Model On Plus-Size Issue Of Italian Vogue: &quot;We Need Fashion To Catch Up To Women Of Size&quot;">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5816282/plus+size-model-on-plus+size-issue-of-italian-vogue-we-need-fashion-to-catch-up-to-women-of-size]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5816282]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[italian vogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modeling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Plus-Size]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plus-size models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Velvet d'amour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vogue italia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weighty Issues]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weighty Matters]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5816282&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous Newsweek Cover]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt; Cover" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt; Cover" href="http://jezebel.com/5816206/undead-princess-diana-strolls-with-kate-middleton-on-ridiculous-newsweek-cover" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt; Cover" alt="Click here to read Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt; Cover" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/06/small_dianalede.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Shudder-inducing fanfic of the week: The new issue of <em>Newsweek</em> features a story called "Diana At 50: If She Were Here Now," by none other than Tina Brown. The digital artwork on the cover reanimates Diana so that she is walking alongside daughter-in-law Kate Middleton, who is gazing adoringly at the People's Princess and ignoring the fact that if this is really happening, Di is a zombie. The <em>Atlantic Wire</em> <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2011/06/how-creepy-princess-dianas-ghost-cover-newsweek/39337/">asks</a>, "How Creepy Is Princess Diana's Ghost on the Cover of Newsweek?" Answer: Very!				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5816206/undead-princess-diana-strolls-with-kate-middleton-on-ridiculous-newsweek-cover" title="Click here to read more about Undead Princess Diana Strolls With Kate Middleton On Ridiculous Newsweek Cover">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5816206/undead-princess-diana-strolls-with-kate-middleton-on-ridiculous-newsweek-cover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5816206]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fanfic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[princess di]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[princess diana]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Princess diana newsweek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tina Brown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5816206&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age" href="http://jezebel.com/maghag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age" href="http://jezebel.com/5811363/ladymags-are-lying-about-their-age" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age" alt="Click here to read Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/06/small_agegraphic_6-13.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				This will shock you: The women portrayed in ladymags don't reflect their readership. In <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43360848/ns/health-skin_and_beauty/">this case</a>, when it comes to age.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5811363/ladymags-are-lying-about-their-age" title="Click here to read more about Ladymags Are Lying About Their Age">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5811363/ladymags-are-lying-about-their-age]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5811363]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Elle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Harper's Bazaar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[women's magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women's magazines and age]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:37:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5811363&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food" href="http://jezebel.com/notable-quotable/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">notablequotable</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food" href="http://jezebel.com/5802756/january-joness-diet-includes-fast-food" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food" alt="Click here to read January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/05/small_allurejanjones517.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The woman who plays Betty Draper says: "I'll stop at McDonald's and get a strawberry shake and fries and not feel guilty at all, because I deserve it."				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5802756/january-joness-diet-includes-fast-food" title="Click here to read more about January Jones's Diet Includes Fast Food">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5802756/january-joness-diet-includes-fast-food]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5802756]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[notable quotable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Allure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Eating]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fast Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[January Jones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 May 2011 17:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5802756&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Barnes &amp; Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model" href="http://jezebel.com/exclusive/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">exclusive</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Barnes &amp; Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model" href="http://jezebel.com/5802115/barnes--noble-censors-cover-featuring-androgynous-male-model" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Barnes &amp; Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model" alt="Click here to read Barnes &amp; Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/05/small_dossier_051611.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Barnes & Noble recently took an unusual step &mdash; the bookstore chain required the magazine <i>Dossier</i> wrap its <a href="http://jezebel.com/5789886/andrej-pejic-goes-topless-for-dossier">new issue</a> in opaque plastic before agreeing to stock it. The problem with the cover? Nudity. More specifically, the nude torso of the famously androgynous male model Andrej Pejic. Barnes & Noble was concerned customers would mistake Pejic for a shirtless <i>woman</i>. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5802115/barnes--noble-censors-cover-featuring-androgynous-male-model" title="Click here to read more about Barnes & Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5802115/barnes--noble-censors-cover-featuring-androgynous-male-model]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5802115]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[andrej pejic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dossier]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[male nudity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shirtlessness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Skye Parrott]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 May 2011 10:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Sauers]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5802115&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands" href="http://jezebel.com/5800119/yet-another-pole-dancing-magazine-hits-the-stands" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands" alt="Click here to read Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/05/small_vertical_arts_fitness_5911.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				In November of last year, the premiere issue of <em>Pole Spin</em> magazine <a href="http://jezebel.com/5691446/introducing-the-magazine-for-pole-dancers/gallery/1" target="new">arrived</a>, and, as far as we could tell, it was the <em>only</em> magazine dedicated to  The International Pole Dance Fitness & Lifestyle. But now! Meet <em>Vertical</em>, a new bimonthly publication <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/finally-pole-dancing-gets-its-own-magazine-131417">about</a> the "sport and performance of pole."				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5800119/yet-another-pole-dancing-magazine-hits-the-stands" title="Click here to read more about Yet Another Pole Dancing Magazine Hits The Stands">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5800119/yet-another-pole-dancing-magazine-hits-the-stands]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5800119]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pole dancing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pole spin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Stripping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vertical art & fitness]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 May 2011 17:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodai Stewart]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5800119&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Cosmopolitan&lt;/i&gt; Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)" href="http://jezebel.com/rant/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">rant</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Cosmopolitan&lt;/i&gt; Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)" href="http://jezebel.com/5797360/cosmo-magazine-gives-you-permission-to-look-in-a-mirror-preferably-while-eating-lettuce" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Cosmopolitan&lt;/i&gt; Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)" alt="Click here to read &lt;i&gt;Cosmopolitan&lt;/i&gt; Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/04/small_hayley_williams_cosmpolitan_may_2011.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				I haven't read <i>Cosmopolitan</i> magazine since I was 16.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5797360/cosmo-magazine-gives-you-permission-to-look-in-a-mirror-preferably-while-eating-lettuce" title="Click here to read more about Cosmopolitan Gives You Permission To Look In A Mirror (Preferably While Eating Lettuce)">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5797360/cosmo-magazine-gives-you-permission-to-look-in-a-mirror-preferably-while-eating-lettuce]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5797360]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane Moore]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5797360&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Time I Was In Tiger Beat]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Time I Was In &lt;em&gt;Tiger Beat&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/maghag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Time I Was In &lt;em&gt;Tiger Beat&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/5791697/the-time-i-was-in-tiger-beat" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Time I Was In &lt;em&gt;Tiger Beat&lt;/em&gt;" alt="Click here to read The Time I Was In &lt;em&gt;Tiger Beat&lt;/em&gt;" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/04/small_tigerbeat_fan2.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Charles Laufer, the founder of <em>Tiger Beat</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/business/media/13laufer.html">died</a> recently. It reminded me of how I wound up posing for the teenybopper bible. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5791697/the-time-i-was-in-tiger-beat" title="Click here to read more about The Time I Was In Tiger Beat">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5791697/the-time-i-was-in-tiger-beat]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5791697]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Remembrances]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Teen Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Teeny boppers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tiger beat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5791697&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Very Stupidest Things Vogue Has Ever Published About Politics]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Very Stupidest Things &lt;i&gt;Vogue&lt;/i&gt; Has Ever Published About Politics" href="http://jezebel.com/terrible/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">terrible</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Very Stupidest Things &lt;i&gt;Vogue&lt;/i&gt; Has Ever Published About Politics" href="http://jezebel.com/5784456/the-very-stupidest-things-vogue-has-ever-published-about-politics" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Very Stupidest Things &lt;i&gt;Vogue&lt;/i&gt; Has Ever Published About Politics" alt="Click here to read The Very Stupidest Things &lt;i&gt;Vogue&lt;/i&gt; Has Ever Published About Politics" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/04/small_xlarge_vogue_tweet_031711.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				American <i>Vogue</i>'s fawning, and roundly criticized, <a href="http://www.vogue.com/magazine/article/asma-al-assad-a-rose-in-the-desert/">profile</a> of Asma al-Assad, the First Lady of Syria, got me thinking about the almost-funny and totally abject stupidity of so much of that luxury rag's "coverage" of "serious" world events. From puff-pieces about dictatorships to homeless chic, models posed as oil-slicked birds to an urban guerilla fashion story, <i>Vogue</i> really has done it all! Never mind the fact that nobody in their right mind would ever pick it up for its up-to-the-minute reports from Benghazi: willful obliviousness on this scale has to be seen to be believed. <!-- %JUMP:More &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5784456/the-very-stupidest-things-vogue-has-ever-published-about-politics" title="Click here to read more about The Very Stupidest Things Vogue Has Ever Published About Politics">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5784456/the-very-stupidest-things-vogue-has-ever-published-about-politics]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5784456]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[terrible]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maghag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Sauers]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5784456&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal" href="http://jezebel.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal" href="http://jezebel.com/5789192/ladymags-and-mens-magazines-are-not-created-equal" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal" alt="Click here to read Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/04/small_tripticmag_4-4.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Some magazine insiders <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/doreeshafrir/status/55293995911356416">are</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/danisteinchizz/status/55285358342049792">irritated</a> by how the industry's top awards <a href="http://magazine.org/asme/about_asme/asme_press_releases/2011-nma-finalists.aspx">reorganized</a> the "general excellence" category: Women's magazines are in the "Fashion, Service and Lifestyle" category, while fashion-centric <em>GQ</em> and other men's magazines fall under the same category as "business, science and active-interest publications."  Separately, about a third of the writer finalists <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/annfriedman/status/55362177904803840">are</a> women.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5789192/ladymags-and-mens-magazines-are-not-created-equal" title="Click here to read more about Ladymags And Men's Magazines Are Not Created Equal">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5789192/ladymags-and-mens-magazines-are-not-created-equal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5789192]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Asmes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[national magazine awards]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:05:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5789192&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?" href="http://jezebel.com/goop/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">goop</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?" href="http://jezebel.com/5787328/can-gwyneth-really-support-her-own-food-magazine" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?" alt="Click here to read Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/03/small_orir-rchgq0.jpg"/>
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</a></div>
									</div>
				<!-- videoId: oriR-RChGQ0 --><!-- /videoId: oriR-RChGQ0 --> Details are hazy &mdash; so take this with a grain of her preferred Maldon Sea Salt &mdash; but word on the street is, Gwyneth may be getting her own glossy.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5787328/can-gwyneth-really-support-her-own-food-magazine" title="Click here to read more about Can Gwyneth Really Support Her Own Food Magazine?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5787328/can-gwyneth-really-support-her-own-food-magazine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5787328]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[GOOP]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gwyneth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gwynnie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:22:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5787328&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?" href="http://jezebel.com/study/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">study</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?" href="http://jezebel.com/5781956/why-do-people-read-magazines-that-make-them-feel-bad" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?" alt="Click here to read Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/03/small_hard_look_mags.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Why do people keep buying beauty and fitness magazines if study after study shows staring at extremely thin models just makes people depressed about their own looks? A new study suggests it isn't just that we're gluttons for punishment. Readers who are unhappy with their looks will avoid comparing themselves to models, but they actually ogle them even more if they're told they can transform themselves into Gisele Bundchen.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5781956/why-do-people-read-magazines-that-make-them-feel-bad" title="Click here to read more about Why Do People Read Magazines That Make Them Feel Bad?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5781956/why-do-people-read-magazines-that-make-them-feel-bad]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5781956]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines envy models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Models low self-esteem]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:33:31 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5781956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them" href="http://jezebel.com/study/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">study</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them" href="http://jezebel.com/5772476/women-more-likely-to-make-purchases-when-models-look-like-them" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them" alt="Click here to read Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_mannequins228.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				One researcher has found something that should surprise nobody: women want to buy clothes more if they see them on models who look like them. Will advertisers actually take notice?				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5772476/women-more-likely-to-make-purchases-when-models-look-like-them" title="Click here to read more about Women More Likely To Make Purchases When Models Look Like Them">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5772476/women-more-likely-to-make-purchases-when-models-look-like-them]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5772476]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Advertisers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plus-size models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna North]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5772476&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines" href="http://jezebel.com/media/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">media</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines" href="http://jezebel.com/5769289/magazine-editors-respond-to-the-dearth-of-female-bylines" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines" alt="Click here to read Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_byline_gap224.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				After a <a href="http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/134775/">post</a> last month about the gender disparity in magazine publishing, which was followed by <a href="http://vidaweb.org/the-count-2010">VIDA's</a> much more thorough and ultimately conclusive study, I, perhaps naively, expected to see a comment or two from the publications about the roots of this imbalance. Then weeks passed, and, well, basically nothing. For a while I thought that perhaps it was time to give this up. They had all likely seen the numbers; I didn't want to come off whiny. But then my curiosity remained, and I figured it couldn't hurt to ask. <!-- %JUMP:Continue reading this post &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5769289/magazine-editors-respond-to-the-dearth-of-female-bylines" title="Click here to read more about Major Mag Editors Address The Dearth Of Female Bylines">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5769289/magazine-editors-respond-to-the-dearth-of-female-bylines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5769289]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Female bylines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Female writers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Harpers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Republic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New York Review Of Books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Republished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elissa  Strauss]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5769289&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines" href="http://jezebel.com/mag-hag/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">maghag</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines" href="http://jezebel.com/5766799/read-the-years-69-silliest-sex+related-cover-lines" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines" alt="Click here to read Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_sex_cover_lines_640.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The design website UnderConsideration has created an incredible interactive graphic featuring 69 real <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #coverlines" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #coverlines" href="http://jezebel.com/#!coverlines/">cover lines</a> featured on magazines in 2010. You can filter by magazine or by various keywords, including "burning," "crazy," "STDs," "thong," and "vagina," to generate a new graphic. It's an incredibly useful tool for figuring out whether you should consult <em>Cosmo</em>, <em>Glamour</em>, <em>Maxim</em>, <em>Men's Heath</em>, <em>Redbook</em>, <em>Self</em>, or <em>Women's Health</em> for expert advice on "His Burning Sex Need." (Hint:  The answer is <em>Cosmo</em>.  All of these lines are absurd, but no other magazine stoops to using the terms "va-jay-jay" and "hoo-ha" on its covers.)				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5766799/read-the-years-69-silliest-sex+related-cover-lines" title="Click here to read more about Read The Year's 69 Silliest Sex-Related Cover Lines">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5766799/read-the-years-69-silliest-sex+related-cover-lines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5766799]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[69 Cover Lines That Will blow Your Mind]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[69 Sex cover Lines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cover lines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5766799&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy" href="http://jezebel.com/buyer-beware/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">buyerbeware</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy" href="http://jezebel.com/5757099/tabloid-wont-honor-its-satisfaction+guaranteed-refund-policy-despite-our-dissatisfaction" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy" alt="Click here to read Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_tabloid_lies_bigpic_copy.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Prepare yourself for the shocking tale of how one tabloid deceived its readers for weeks, seemingly without remorse. I'm not talking about how the weekly gossip rags regularly print spurious rumors about Jessica Simpson's undying love for Nick Lachey or Suri's skincare regimen. <em>OK!</em> magazine broke a promise, and no amount of adorable Jolie-Pitt kid photos will ever make it up to me. <!-- %JUMP:Continue reading this post &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5757099/tabloid-wont-honor-its-satisfaction+guaranteed-refund-policy-despite-our-dissatisfaction" title="Click here to read more about Tabloid Won't Honor Its Satisfaction-Guaranteed Refund Policy">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5757099/tabloid-wont-honor-its-satisfaction+guaranteed-refund-policy-despite-our-dissatisfaction]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5757099]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Buyer Beware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[OK Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ok refund]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ok satisfaction guaranteed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tabloids]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:25:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5757099&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit" href="http://jezebel.com/fit-for-print/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">fitforprint</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit" href="http://jezebel.com/5753287/womens-fitness-magazines-are-bullshit" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit" alt="Click here to read Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_negativefitness_01.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				They promise to tone, transform, fix, and whittle your body, but all <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #womensfitnessmagazines" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #womensfitnessmagazines" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/womensfitnessmagazines/">women's fitness magazines</a> really do is help you lose all that flabby self-esteem you've spent years accumulating.  How are they bullshit?  Let us count the ways. <!-- %JUMP:Continue reading this post &raquo;% -->				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5753287/womens-fitness-magazines-are-bullshit" title="Click here to read more about Women's Fitness Magazines Are Bullshit">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5753287/womens-fitness-magazines-are-bullshit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5753287]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Fit for print]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ladymags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[move]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[self]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women's fitness magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[women's health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Womens fitness]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Gloria Ryan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5753287&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine" href="http://jezebel.com/hef-salad/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">hefsalad</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine" href="http://jezebel.com/5753038/i-was-a-playboycom-editor" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine" alt="Click here to read I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_hef1.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<em>In light of a lengthy new <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/magazine/06Hefner-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine">profile</a> of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hughhefner" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hughhefner" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/hughhefner/">Hugh Hefner</a>, a former editor muses on Hef's passage from icon to ghost.</em>				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5753038/i-was-a-playboycom-editor" title="Click here to read more about I Was A Cog In The Playboy Machine">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5753038/i-was-a-playboycom-editor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5753038]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Hef salad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hugh Hefner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playboy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playboy Magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playboy Mansion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playboy.com]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Playmates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Soft core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Feb 2011 13:17:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chauncey  Hollingsworth]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5753038&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy" href="http://jezebel.com/gleeking-out/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">gleekingout</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy" href="http://jezebel.com/5751898/righteous-moms-wont-allow-lea-michele-to-be-sexy" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy" alt="Click here to read Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_cosmo_lea_michele.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				The March cover of <em>Cosmo</em> features <em>Glee</em>'s resident "good girl" <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leamichele" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leamichele" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/leamichele/">Lea Michele</a> in a top that's cut nearly to her belly button. Cue the parental hand-wringing!				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5751898/righteous-moms-wont-allow-lea-michele-to-be-sexy" title="Click here to read more about Righteous Moms Just Can't Let Lea Michele Be Sexy">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5751898/righteous-moms-wont-allow-lea-michele-to-be-sexy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5751898]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Gleeking out]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cosmo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lea michele]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lea michele cosmo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lea michele cosmopolitan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mag Hag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Hartmann]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5751898&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines" href="http://jezebel.com/charts/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">charts</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines" href="http://jezebel.com/5750239/the-sorry-state-of-women-at-top-magazines" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines" alt="Click here to read The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/02/small_vida_charts22.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				VIDA has counted up the female writers &mdash; and female-authored books reviewed at a variety of publications &mdash; and these charts detail their dismal results (dudes are in red). So what's behind this inequality?				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5750239/the-sorry-state-of-women-at-top-magazines" title="Click here to read more about The Sorry State Of Women At Top Magazines">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5750239/the-sorry-state-of-women-at-top-magazines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5750239]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nonfiction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[The Count]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[VIDA]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women's writing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Writing and Gender]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:37:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna North]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5750239&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bon Appetit Unwisely Joins Forces With SATC]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Bon Appetit&lt;/em&gt; Unwisely Joins Forces With &lt;em&gt;SATC&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/food-for-thought/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">foodforthought</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Bon Appetit&lt;/em&gt; Unwisely Joins Forces With &lt;em&gt;SATC&lt;/em&gt;" href="http://jezebel.com/5742093/bon-appetit-unwisely-joins-forces-with-satc" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Bon Appetit&lt;/em&gt; Unwisely Joins Forces With &lt;em&gt;SATC&lt;/em&gt;" alt="Click here to read &lt;em&gt;Bon Appetit&lt;/em&gt; Unwisely Joins Forces With &lt;em&gt;SATC&lt;/em&gt;" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2011/01/small_picture_4_10.png"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bonappetit" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bonappetit" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/bonappetit/">Bon Appetit</a>'s "irreverent new ad campaign" is one thing. Getting Carrie'd away, quite another.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5742093/bon-appetit-unwisely-joins-forces-with-satc" title="Click here to read more about Bon Appetit Unwisely Joins Forces With SATC">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5742093/bon-appetit-unwisely-joins-forces-with-satc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5742093]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[food for thought]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bon Appetit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sex And The City]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:16:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5742093&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

