• more about #maghag more comments →
    Scout: oh man...that was so boring. and I thought I was uber bored BEFORE I started reading. about nothing. and nobody. Are these women on some sort of c... more »
    yvanehtnioj: The more I look at that Natalie Portman cover, the more amused I am by the extreme crazyface. But props where they're due: finally a neckline that is... more »
    femme-bot: Britney...? Britney who? more »
    yvanehtnioj: Kate Hudson looks like Hayden Panetierre (I cannot even begin to believe I spelled that correctly. The cheerleader from Heroes, is who I mean) on tha... more »
    hortense: The same six actresses have swapped covers amongst themselves again. For real. With the exception of Lady Gaga and Britney holding her kids, you cou... more »
    Ratinski: Uh, Natalie, I did go to high school parties, and I managed not to touch alcohol until college and still haven't touched pot. Of course, where I come... more »
    JerseyGrrrl: Please tell me some poor soul had to sit around the offices of Harper's Bazaar and count 562 items in this magazine. Really? more »
    bluewine: Sorry to edit, but I believe you mean January 2010. I can't believe it will be 2010! more »
    Diziet_Sma: Wait, so nudey-girl calenders are empowering now? Hell, put me down for Pirelli, in that case. Ugh. more »
    ihateyourescalade: Way to exploit women's bodies under the protective mantle of feminism, Glamour. more »
  • We can't find any posts with those tags. Or check your spelling and try again.