<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jezebel: Freakonomics]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jezebel.com/tag/freakonomics</link>
		<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://gawker.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
		<description><![CDATA[Jezebel posts tagged Freakonomics]]></description>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex" href="http://jezebel.com/tattoo-nation/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">tattoonation</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex" href="http://jezebel.com/5542682/not-every-tattoo-is-about-sex" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex" alt="Click here to read Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2012/02/small_6be504b6697e99fdae70bd9171d8368c.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Steven D. Levitt at <em>Freakonomics</em> asks (and answers) the ever-annoying question: <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/tattoonomics-part-i/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FreakonomicsBlog+%28Freakonomics+Blog%29"><em>why get a tattoo</em>? </a> After rejecting the obvious, he zeroes in on the one reason we get inked (and do everything else): Sex.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5542682/not-every-tattoo-is-about-sex" title="Click here to read more about Not Every Tattoo Is About Sex">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5542682/not-every-tattoo-is-about-sex]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5542682]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Tattoo nation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Body art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Body Modification]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Painted ladies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tattoos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Why tattoos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katy Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5542682&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kissin' Cousins]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" href="http://jezebel.com/kissing/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">kissing</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" href="http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" alt="Click here to read Kissin' Cousins" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2009/01/TheKiss2.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				U.S.: One kiss. France: Two. Netherlands: 3. In today's "<a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/who-changes-the-kissing-rules/">Freakonomics</a>," Daniel Hamermesh asks, who makes the kissing rules? Who changes them? How do we learn them? And we'd better! [<a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/who-changes-the-kissing-rules/">New York Times</a>]				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins" title="Click here to read more about Kissin' Cousins">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5127753/kissin-cousins]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5127753]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Kissing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interaction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sadie Stein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5127753&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?" href="http://jezebel.com/cut-it-out/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">cutitout</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?" href="http://jezebel.com/5018052/plastic-surgery-where-do-you-draw-the-line-between-deformity-and-vanity" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?" alt="Click here to read Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2008/06/76/04/small_76042553b88ee8c45a9719ea10294b1e.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Americans are spending a reported <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/life/main/5834210.html">$13.2 billion</a> on cosmetic surgery (more than the GDP of Bolivia!), but should health insurers be reimbursing at least a few of these procedures? Over on the <em>New York Times</em> "Freakonomics" blog, plastic surgeon Dr. Michael Zenn <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/your-plastic-surgery-questions-answered/">points out</a>: "Insurance companies often insist that surgery should treat a functional problem, not a cosmetic one. However, the distinction is not as black and white as they would like and there is a large gray area between the two." Zenn uses the following as an example: "We might all agree that a woman who is a C cup and wants to be a D cup should not be covered by insurance, but what about an 18-year-old girl who has one B cup breast and one D cup breast? Many would argue that this scenario creates a functional problem that is hard to describe as only cosmetic. What about a woman who has had a mastectomy and wants a reconstruction? Cosmetic?"				<a href="http://jezebel.com/5018052/plastic-surgery-where-do-you-draw-the-line-between-deformity-and-vanity" title="Click here to read more about Plastic Surgery: Where Do You Draw The Line Between Deformity And Vanity?">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5018052/plastic-surgery-where-do-you-draw-the-line-between-deformity-and-vanity]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-5018052]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cut it out]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Facial Deformities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Plastic surgery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reconstructive surgery]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica G.]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018052&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Prostitutes Are The New Therapists]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><a title="Click here to read Prostitutes Are The New Therapists" href="http://jezebel.com/sexual-healing/" style="background-color:#888888; color:#FFFFFF; font-size:12px;text-align:right; display:block; height:14px; padding:1px 2px; text-decoration:none; text-transform:uppercase; width:156px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">sexualhealing</span></a></div -->					<div><a title="Click here to read Prostitutes Are The New Therapists" href="http://jezebel.com/373392/prostitutes-are-the-new-therapists" class="pp_image">
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read Prostitutes Are The New Therapists" alt="Click here to read Prostitutes Are The New Therapists" src="http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2008/03/small_naughtynurse32808.jpg"/>
											</a></div>
									</div>
				Hookers are everywhere these days: on the cover of the <a href="http://jezebel.com/373193/really-eliot-you-interfaced-with-this">cover of the <em>Post</em></a>, in a special <a href="http://jezebel.com/371282/young-beauty-sells-her-body-breaks-our-hearts?cpage=2#viewcomments">Diane Sawyer</a> boasts, you find prostitutes here and there, you can find prostitutes anywhere! But seriously, folks, the nerds over at the <em>New York Times'</em> <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/your-sex-industry-questions-answered/">Freakonomics blog</a> have an interview with two sex workers, Mindy and Dorothy, who answer readers' burning questions about what it's really like to be a prostitute. High or low end, they're all in cahoots with the coppers and they think legalization is ultimately bad for prostitutes because "they will just get exploited. They'll get paid a lot less and be forced to do a lot more." But the most interesting part is that both Mindy and Dorothy think "much of prostitution work is about therapy."				<a href="http://jezebel.com/373392/prostitutes-are-the-new-therapists" title="Click here to read more about Prostitutes Are The New Therapists">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/373392/prostitutes-are-the-new-therapists]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-373392]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sexual healing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diane Sawyer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Melissa Gira Grant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pucker up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tristan taormino]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica G.]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=373392&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Finance Roundup: We Scan The Biz Pages So As To Stop Hating Ourselves]]></title>
			<description>
			<![CDATA[
				<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
									</div>
				Sick of celebs &mdash; of the non Money Honey <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/dana-vachon/">neo-P. Keaton</a> variety &mdash; yet? Good, cause it's time for finance roundup, that thing we're doing so we don't lose all our neurons to the  silicon-silicone vortex. (Get that? Please?) Basically the big news today is that the Fed Chief, who is no longer Alan Greenspan so we really don't trust him, has called a recession "unlikely" despite all the bad news for the housing market, meaning you may actually be able to afford those babydoll dresses and lumberjack flannels along with your rent this time around. But probably not. Because economic health is for rich people.				<a href="http://jezebel.com/247841/finance-roundup-we-scan-the-biz-pages-so-as-to-stop-hating-ourselves" title="Click here to read more about Finance Roundup: We Scan The Biz Pages So As To Stop Hating Ourselves">More&nbsp;&raquo;</a>
				<br style="clear: both;" />
			]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/247841/finance-roundup-we-scan-the-biz-pages-so-as-to-stop-hating-ourselves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jezebel-247841]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Finance Roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fast Food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wsj]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:06:12 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moe]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=247841&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

