New Hampshire is trying to tell women they're giving themselves cancer by having abortions, but wouldn't you know it, their "logic" falls apart if you even so much as glance at it, and vulcanized was brave enough to do just that:
I don't understand. I follow the claim that pregnancy reduces the risk of breast cancer, but why would abortion increase it? Abortion is not the opposite of pregnancy. Not being pregnant is. How am I, who has never been pregnant, different from a woman who has had an abortion? Aren't we the same? Or if it's true that estrogen released during pregnancy is good for the breasts, wouldn't the woman who had an abortion be a little better off than me since at she had at least some of that estrogen? This makes it sound like I am practically killing myself by not putting a baby in my tummy pocket.
Submit nominations to the Comment of the Day tag page. Click on the comment's time stamp, and post the comment's URL to the forum along with the tag #cotd. (Replying to a comment with "#cotd" does not work.)
Use #trollpatrol to report comments that you feel the editors/mods should be aware of. Try not to respond to/approve/promote trollish comments in the threads — instead, just post the comment on the #trollpatrol page, the same way you'd post a comment on #groupthink or on the #cotd page, and the editors/mods will take care of it.
For meetups, use the meetup tag page!