The New York Times set about to find out why women are left cold by McMahon:
Interviews with nearly three dozen women around the state reveal that many are troubled by what they see as the harshness of the attacks Ms. McMahon has leveled at Mr. Blumenthal, the wall-to-wall advertising she is underwriting with tens of millions of dollars, and her role in the wrestling industry, with its cartoonish and demeaning depictions of women.
It's interesting to see "demeaning" standing there alone, without a "Timesian critics say" qualifier attached to it. (Everything we know about the WWE, we learned from videos attacking Linda McMahon and Mick Foley, so we're going to withhold judgment until further study.) They also quote a woman who appears to oppose McMahon for other reasons: