For the first time in a hundred years, a woman is on death row in Virginia. Now Iran is calling the US hypocritical for its objection to the execution of Sakineh Ashtiani. Are they right?
According to the NY Daily News, Teresa Lewis was convicted of plotting to kill her husband and stepson, with the help of two men she met at Wal-Mart. The men, who actually carried out the murder, received life sentences, while Lewis got the death penalty. Appeals have centered around Lewis's IQ — at 72, it's just above the cutoff for mental retardation — and on a statement by one of her accomplices, who wrote, "Killing Julian and Charles Lewis was entirely my idea. I needed money, and Teresa was an easy target." Nonetheless, Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell isn't convinced, and Lewis is scheduled to die this Thursday.
Lewis isn't the only woman on death row right now — according to the Death Penalty Information Center, there were 61 as of January 1, or a little under 2% of the total death row population. But Lewis would be the first woman to be executed in the whole country since 2005, and her sentence comes at an inopportune time, when many in the US are speaking out against Iran's execution of another woman, Sakineh Ashtiani. Hillary Clinton has asked for Ashtiani's release, and now Iran is accusing the US of hypocrisy. Says one Iranian news agency,
The US and the American media tried their best to make a symbol of human rights out of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani because of the background of their atrocities towards Iran but after seven years, human rights organisations have been silent for Teresa. This shows their double standard in relation to other counties.
On the one hand, sources in Iran exaggerate the similarity between the two cases. Some news agencies are claiming that Lewis was convicted of "having an extramarital relationship," like Ashtiani, when in fact that's not a crime in the US. However, the Iranian media and government have a point: it's hard for the US to protest other countries' execution decisions when it continues to administer the death penalty. We may think murder is a more valid reason for execution than adultery, but as long as we're killing our own citizens, it's hard for us to take the moral high ground. In fact, Lewis's gender is really immaterial here — the real question is, does our government have the right to take a life? If we answer yes (unlike, it should be noted, many other countries), we can hardly criticize Iran for doing the same.