Her "long, blond-streaked hair fall[s] just so above each breast and her cheerleader-pretty face...Any old swatch of cloth rides like a midsummer night's dream on... her ‘most incredibly perfect body.'" Newsweek sure did appreciate Gloria Steinem's ideas in 1971!
That little masturbatory passage is just one reminder that we have, in fact, made some progress over the past few decades — now, such officially-sanctioned slobber is now more likely to be found in men's magazines than newsweeklies. Though, as the main story in Newsweek's package on women and feminism, led by three young women at the magazine, argues, not quite enough progress:
The more we talked to our friends and colleagues, the more we heard the same stories of disillusionment, regardless of profession. No one would dare say today that "women don't write here," as the NEWSWEEK women were told 40 years ago. But men wrote all but six of NEWSWEEK's 49 cover stories last year-and two of those used the headline "The Thinking Man." In 1970, 25 percent of NEWSWEEK's editorial masthead was female; today that number is 39 percent. Better? Yes. But it's hardly equality.
We should add that we are proud to work at NEWSWEEK. (Really, boss, we are!) We write about our magazine not because we feel it's worse here, but because NEWSWEEK was once ground zero for a movement that was supposed to break at least one glass ceiling. Just as our predecessors' 1970 [gender-discrimination] case didn't happen in a vacuum, NEWSWEEK today is neither unique nor unusual. Female bylines at major magazines are still outnumbered by seven to one; women are just 3 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs and less than a quarter of law partners and politicians.
It's nice to see a full-throated embrace of feminism by the magazine that, among its many cycles in and out of the gender war, was responsible for one of Susan Faludi's signature examples of the 1980s backlash against feminism. (The above cover was included in the magazine's own Web gallery). Newsweek has always been a voice and a champion of the establishment (professed flirtations with counterintuitiveness notwithstanding), so if feminism gets to shed some of its marginalization in the process, great.
There is a space for media criticism in all this, and for self-criticism, and for self-revelation. And yet to have your entire, extensive editorial package focus on your magazine and its past covers, and your childhood, and your issues with the F-word — well, it's all too easy for something like this to happen. If the actual staff of Newsweek doesn't include much in the way of diversity, isn't it time to utilize those reporting skills of which the traditional media is supposed to be the last guardians?