Jezebel

  • Jezebel
  • celebrity
  • sex
  • fashion
Profile logout login
Writer Pins Concern For Fashion Models On Female Jealousy

Writer Pins Concern For Fashion Models On Female Jealousy #weightymatters #lisahilton

J. Crew: Socks & Sensibilities

J. Crew: Socks & Sensibilities #todayincatalogs #jcrewcatalog

Fat Like Him: Self-Help Writer's Ex Speaks Out

Fat Like Him: Self-Help Writer's Ex Speaks Out #backtalk #marryhim

Does Sexism Sell? With Super Bowl Commercials, Not Really

Does Sexism Sell? With Super Bowl Commercials, Not Really #badvertising #superbowladssexist

<i>Kell On Earth</i>: Idiot Interns, Idiot Journalists

Kell On Earth: Idiot Interns, Idiot Journalists #realitybites #kellonearthgeorgew

Dita Von Teese Gets &quot;Scared&quot; On <em>RuPaul's Drag Race</em>

Dita Von Teese Gets "Scared" On RuPaul's Drag Race #youbetterwork #rupaulsdragrace

<i>Weekly Standard</i> Writer: The Real Victims Of &quot;Hookup Culture&quot; Are Guys

Weekly Standard Writer: The Real Victims Of "Hookup Culture" Are Guys #betablues #hookupculture

Jezebel

FAQ. Include # before tag:
#tips, #snapjudgment, #groupthink, etc.

New York, 7:52 AM
Wed Feb 10
67 posts in the last 24 hours

JEZEBEL TEAM

Tip your editors:


Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter

Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan Morrissey
| Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter

Reporter:
Irin Carmon


Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter

Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
| Twitter
Latoya Peterson

Jenna Sauers


Contributor/Intern Coordinator:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter

Interns:
Maura Canavan
Madeleine Desmond
Noorain Khan
Lucy Zhihui Zhu

Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO JEZEBEL RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1770 Subscribers


Please confirm your birth date:

Please enter a valid date
Please enter your full birth year
This content is restricted.

New Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Spark Confusion, Criticism

On Monday, a government task force recommended that women under 50 not get regular mammograms, and the news has many women confused and worried about losing insurance coverage.

NBC's Andrea Mitchell and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, herself a breast cancer survivor, talk above about one of the biggest concerns sparked by the new guidelines: that insurance companies will now choose not to cover mammograms for women under 50. Doctors say this won't happen immediately, but is certainly possible, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance is already changing its system for grading health plans to reflect the new recommendations. Because of this, many worry that the change is motivated by a desire for cost-cutting, and not a concern for women's health. Carol H. Lee of the American College of Radiology says,

The only conclusion I can come to is it's economically motivated. In this climate, when we are all paying attention to how we can decrease the cost of health care, in my opinion that's the primary motivation.

But the United States Preventive Services Task Force, which not only recommended the change in mammogram ages but also said breast self exams have little benefit, says the real issue is unnecessary screening and even treatment. Women in their 40s are 60% more likely to experience false positives from mammograms, leading to unnecessary follow-up tests and anxiety. While these risks may seem relatively minor, early screening also increases the odds that a woman will be treated for cancer that never would have sickened her — and unnecessary cancer treatment is a much more serious proposition than a biopsy. Some women, in fact, seem relieved by the new guidelines. 51-year-old Nancy Moylan told the New York Times,

Sure, I know plenty of women who have breast cancer. And I know many, many women who've received false-positives. It always struck me that most women seemed so relieved to know that they don't have cancer that they never took the next step and said, ‘Hey, why was I just put through that anxiety? I've had all these invasive tests and worry only to find out that the mammogram isn't all it's cracked up to be?'

What's frustrating for many women may be the uncertainty of breast cancer screening, uncertainty only further compounded by the new guidelines, which have already been criticized by the American Cancer Society. Liesl Schillinger writes in The Daily Beast,

The only consistent message from the scientific community to women is to be afraid. How can issues of such life-and-death importance to women-more than half the population-be so murkily understood, and so conflictingly explained? Are medical authorities playing a guessing game with women's health?

Unfortunately, when it comes to breast cancer, a guessing game still seems to be the only game in town. Dr. Donald A. Berry, a statistician on the task force, says the money spent on regular mammograms for women under 50 "was buying something of net negative value," and that with the new guidelines, "the economy benefits, but women are the major beneficiaries." And in fact, many women have long forgone mammograms because they personally feel the risks outweigh the benefits. Unfortunately, mammograms only reduce the breast cancer death rate by 15% — a big deal if you are one of the ones saved, but still a relatively small fraction of all sufferers. This statistic — and the high number of false positives associated with mammograms — shows that what women really need are better screening tools. But for now, we have to decide what to do with the tools we have, and this decision has just become a lot more complicated.

Mammograms And Politics: Task force Stirs Up A Tempest [Washington Post]
Many Doctors To Stay Course On Breast Exams For Now [NYT]
New Mammogram Advice Finds A Skeptical Audience [NYT]
Panel Urges Mammograms At 50, Not 40 [NYT]
The Great Mammogram Debate [Daily Beast]


Send an email to Anna North, the author of this post, at annanorth@jezebel.com.


Upload an image | Add an image URL ×
×
×
Choose a file to upload:
×
Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
Loading comments ... -/|\
Earlier discussions Paging in progress... | Other discussions | Show all discussions | Show featured discussions only | Expand all replies Hide all replies
Start a new discussion
By Anna N.
Nov 18, 2009 09:30 AM 7 visitors3,117 85
Edit » Set to Draft » Invite » Syndicate »

Syndicate this post


Site:
Mode:

sending request
cancel
more about #mammograms
Party Crashers Slammed In Sin City • Michelle Obama Reflects On The Past Year
Filibuster: Joe Lieberman Continues To Be A Jerk Of The First Order
Senators Protect Mammograms, Screening Tests for Women
read more: #breastintentions, #mammograms, #newmammogramguidelines, #breastcancer, #cancer, #cancerscreening, #insurance, #healthcare, #health
 
  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Jezebel account.

Sign up here.



Send An Invitation

To invite commenters to this page, paste in a list of comma-separated email addresses, and then select send invites.

Please enter at least one email address.
Please use valid email addresses.
Please use unique email addresses.
Please enter fewer addresses.
requesting invites

Send a link

Send a link to this post 'New Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Spark Confusion, Criticism' via email:

Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your recipient's email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your message.
Sending message