Check out Jessica Simpson gracing the cover of the September issue of Elle. She looks great, doesn't she? While there's no doubt that Ms. Simpson is slim yet curvy girl, this particular shape appears to be digitally manufactured. We received a few tips about her waist being whittled, so we decided to take a closer look. An amateur investigation, after the jump.
Let's focus on that plaid shirt. So fascinating how the sleeves are rumpled and soft and look like actual fabric, while the sides that are in the shape of her body are sharp and crisp.
What's up with the pocket not being extended into the zero in 600? Did they downsize her boobs?
Again, this pocket does not seem right. Also, the top of her sleeve looks like actual fabric. All along her sides, the lines are too sharp, too defined. Definitely whittled via Photoshop. Inside the magazine, Jessica is photographed in another plaid shirt; maybe this one was touched-up too, but her body just looks more natural.
Isn't the body on the right more believable? Why is it tucked inside? Why does the cover have to be a medical oddity?
Perhaps on the right she took her ribcage out temporarily, then popped it back in for the photo on the left?
The photo on the right is an unaltered photograph of Jessica out and about. There is not a damn thing wrong with the size of her waist or boobs. Thery're just not good enough for the cover of Elle. And guess what? She's been on the cover of Elle wearing a plaid shirt next to the words "Fall Fashion" before. The image on the right is from September 2004.
Anyway, if you're wondering why digitally altering a cover is such a big deal, you should probably read Anna's post about the Faith Hill Redbook cover. It's a terrible and dangerous thing. To quote Anna: