Over on Racialicious, Latoya Peterson writes about the March issue of Glamour, which contains a transcript from the panel that editor-in-chief Cindi Leive put together after the slide show debacle six months ago in which an editor called an Afro "a no-no" and declared dreadlocks "political." The editor was fired, and the subsequent racial peace summit happened in November. The panel featured Farai Chideya (NPR, News & Notes), Vanessa Bush (Essence), Jami Floyd (TV anchor), Daisy Hernandez (Colorlines), Lisa Price (Carol's Daughter Hair Products), Venus Opal Reese (PH.D, University of Texas), Mally Roncal (make up artist/entrepreneur), and Barbara Trepagnier (sociology professor). And yet, Peterson writes, as she read the transcript, she asked herself, "How did something so right go so wrong?"
The prevailing dominance of the white beauty ideal was not mentioned. Most of the discussion focused around corporate ideals of what is acceptable and what is not... We can discuss differences in hair texture. We can discuss differences in body type. We can discuss differences in facial features. But this does not change the reality that 'white' is considered the golden standard and that everything else is deemed unacceptable. Straightened hair, fairer skin, keener features are all considered beautiful while anything else is automatically considered unattractive. If you are a woman of color, you suddenly find yourself under enormous pressure to compensate for that you 'lack.'
Earlier: 'Glamour' Editor To Lady Lawyers: Being Black Is Kinda A Corporate "Don't"
Glamour "Racist" Freed From Slavery To Fashion
Glamour "Racist" Ashley Baker Calls Us, Sets Nappy Hair Story Straight
Glamour Attempts To Negotiate Peace Between Blacks, Bitchy Redheads
How Does A Black Woman Feel About The Glamour Controversy? I Asked Myself!