NEW YORK, 1:49 PM, FRI MAY 16 | 49 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@jezebel.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS

If You Read One More Story About Britney In Your Life Ever...

rsbrit.jpgAsra Nomani is best-known today for imploring the press to just forget about fucking Britney Spears already. But Asra Nomani was best-known last summer for being the former best friend of Mariane Pearl who had basically been dropped by Mariane for Angelina Jolie, who played Mariane in the movie A Mighty Heart, and was, for that and various other reasons, declared by Esquire to be the "best person in the world" (in a piece notably criticized as the worst celebrity profile in the world.) I thought hard about ALL THESE THINGS when I read this week's Rolling Stone cover story on Britney Spears, which is sort of the logical sequel to the Angelina Jolie profile; overwrought, over-intellectualized and really fucking good rumination on the transformation of a troubled young girl estranged from her father. Is any of it true, though? Well, at the beginning, Britney gets approached by a nervous fan, who says she's "from the South too" and could she maybe get a picture for her little sister? Lips "almost vibrating with anger," she stares the girl "deep in the eyes" and says "I don't know who you think I am, bitch." (Um, Britney, bitch?) "But I'm not that person." In a way, it's the same thing Nomani is trying to say!

The whole "Rorschach Test" thing is getting a lot of press lately. You see in whatever those things you want to see. Britney is Bush, Angelina is Barack Obama, Barack Obama is Jesus Christ, Hillary Clinton is your mom, Hillary Clinton is your menopausal boss from hell. Nomani knows better than most that none of any of this is true, that it's more complicated than that.

I learned a few things I did not know from the Rolling Stone piece. I did not know that Kevin Federline's lawyers is a "former Israeli operative" who "penetrated the inner circles of Hollyood" in a way "not unlike counterterrorism" or that before he met Britney K-Fed's Chevy was repossessed. Or that the paparazzo who usually manages to get up front during her dramatic car chases is a former Death Row records executive. Or that once upon a time Britney Spears was a polite, well-mannered kid who did all her chores but she was driven to madness in part by two pivotal moments in her life: the trauma of the media mockery following her boob job, and cheating on Justin Timberlake with her choreographer. And there but for the grace of Harvey Levin go all of us?

Is any of this true? It is probably an oversimplification. Is the inspiring tale of Angelina's dramatic turnaround, from troubled self-mutilator estranged from her father to World's Best Person, also an oversimplification? No doubt. Do we tell ourselves stories in order to live? Are the stories in Us Weekly more dangerous than those in the Bible and the Koran? Am I really going to spend another hour I could have spent learning about, I dunno, the fallout of the Pakistani election on that question? I guess I just did.

3:00 PM on Tue Feb 19 2008
By Moe
7,635 views
86 comments

Comments

  • That first paragraph is confusing as hell. Who exactly are we talking about? This Asra person, Angie, Mariane, Britney, whoami?

  • Image of hortense hortense at 03:30 PM on 02/19/08 *

    The one thing about that article that stuck with me was the part about her breast implants, and how she'd had them, but was told not to admit it, and that she was basically taught to lie to the public, and somehow this crazy Britney rebellion is her way of shoving the truth down people's throats, whether they like it or not.

  • That cover picture makes my eyes twitch.

    Those colors just look like a bad scan to me.

  • i want some of what you're smokin, moe.

  • Image of ineffable.me ineffable.me at 03:32 PM on 02/19/08 *

    Rolling Stone started everything by putting her in sexy lingerie, holding a fucking stuffed animal on their cover back when she was 16 or whatever. So there's that.

  • @ineffable.me: Rolling Stone is one of the worst magazines out there, because people think it's actually kind of credible.

  • Image of hortense hortense at 03:37 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @ineffable.me: @katekate: Rolling Stone is your lame uncle who wants to know if you have "heard of this Strokes band" in 2008.

  • @ineffable.me: Yeah, considering RS has made money off of exploiting Britney's sexuality for years now, they're hardly in any position to judge the paps and the users surrounding her now. They're just as culpable.

  • Image of ineffable.me ineffable.me at 03:38 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @hortense: hahaha.

  • @ineffable.me: Ditto. For a RS writer to complain about Britney being an "inbred swamp thing" is like Dr. Frankenstein whining about his monster getting loose to tear shit up in the countryside.

    To be honest, I'm having a tough time understanding Moe's point.

  • @hortense: Brilliant!

  • Image of ineffable.me ineffable.me at 03:40 PM on 02/19/08 *

    The only redeeming quality RS has is Rob Sheffield. But not even my love for this guy can bring me to spend any money on this magazine. (Which is why if you ask me about music today all I can tell you is Hannah Montana and Rihanna and only because I read about them here, haha)

  • @hortense: That took me by surprise, as well. Going onstage during the VMAs in just a bikini as a way of saying, "This is me, take it or leave it?" It seemed a little farfetched but it does make some sense on the surface.

  • @hortense: Honestly, I can't say that I wouldn't eventually have gone completely fucking nuts either, with the amount of pressure that's been put on her since she was a teenager. She pranced around in lingerie but still had to tell everyone she was a virgin in order to sell records. She got a boob job but couldn't say anything about it, because it'd ruin her "perfect innocent Christian virgin" image. She was made out to be this fucking sex object for 40 year old men when she wasn't really even old enough to understand her own sexuality!

    She has never been allowed to have one single failure in her life. If she shows an ounce of weakness, she's leapt upon and torn apart by the same people who idolized her when she was who they wanted her to be.

    I'm still rooting for her. She never got a chance to just be a normal fucking human being, even when she was a little girl.

  • So here's what I want to know. Whose idea was it to market 16 year old Britney as a naughty school girl? Does this article answer that question? I've been wondering that since 1998 or whenever this whole Britney phenomenon began. Someone once told me it was her parents who decided that, but my guess is her label. Anyone know? Just curious. What a serious mindfuck for a teenager.

  • Image of SinisterRouge SinisterRouge at 03:44 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @ineffable.me: I totally remember that cover. Underwear no bra. Sideways. 16 yrs old.

  • @esmemurphy: I saw this special on VH1 where her mom said it was her idea to dress up in the schoolgirl outfit, but she apparently saw it as this fun, innocent thing. The record label went along with it.

  • @hortense: haha, I'm so glad I am not the only Stones hater!

    I read the article on Britney and wondered how much of the article was tabloid fodder and how much was actually, oh, I don't know, real investigating (with real, credible evidence).

    They should just continue to follow The Strokes and 50 Cent around. (why did they have Christina wear a quitar for one of their covers? Are guitars ever even AROUND her?)

  • @SinisterRouge: Here is a picture of the cover you're referring to, just FYI:
    [chrisonrails.files.wordpress.com]


  • @SinisterRouge: when does it start to be kiddie porn?

  • @hortense: I didn't think that people actually, like, *read* it any more.

  • So can you read that article online or do you have to actually buy the magazine?

  • Image of Moe Moe at 03:48 PM on 02/19/08 *

    Oh, Rolling Stone prints some pretty good stuff. It's too easy to make fun of their post-sixties relevance crisis. A good friend of mine won a national magazine award covering the war for them. Of course, they once also waited over a year to pay me a kill fee, but…

  • @Moe: Their war and politics coverage is pretty good. I'll give them that. I thought they were a music magazine though...

  • Image of jenndavo jenndavo at 03:49 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @Sukie in the Graveyard: Yeah, I get what you mean. The woman is followed by no less than 20 paps, usually 24 hours a day. How did they miss her screaming at a child in the middle of a mall? Seems like someone would have seen that, right? So is this something they heard from a clerk?

  • @kitschenette: holy crapola.
    And to think how young she was. I'm 26 and I look a few decades younger than she does in that pic. Poor kid.


  • @kitschenette: Yes, I think I saw an interview with Britney where she was like, "I just got the idea to tie my shirt up." I don't know if it was actually she or the label who thought of it.

    I was dating my husband at the time and I still remember my future mother-in-law saying she thought the video was "cute" and thinking it was adorable when my husband's three year old sister knew all the words to "Baby One More Time." Uh, NO.

  • I feel terrible that she was told to lie about her boob job, but to say that is the start of her downturn? How about when she was shoved into showbusiness at a young age and told to lie about EVERYTHING. To make this about tits and sex is to oversimplify.

  • If that scene ever happened, it couldn't have happened at the Topanga Mall as it says in the very first sentence of the story. There's no Betsey Johnson there - it's at Westfield Fashion Square Sherman Oaks. So ... it's a minor detail but makes me think they don't have fact checkers and this chick made that entire scene up. And then probably everything else.

  • Image of rednrowdy rednrowdy at 03:52 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @esmemurphy: not just whose idea was it, but regardless of whose idea it was (all sorts of wacky ideas get thrown about during marketing brainstorming), who was the person who signed off on it?!? further, why didn't her parents intervene?

    the whole thing is distasteful from the get go.

  • I'm so tired of this "had no childhood argument" you know who had no childhood, Somali and Darfur refugees who had to walk across a country before they were 10, children who are molested or forced into prostitution. These kids had no childhood. She's just another spoiled little princess from the south filled with excuses.

    There I said it, and I don't feel bad about it.

  • @AthertonMerriweather: Yeah, their foreign affairs coverage has a high batting average. I sorta miss PJ O'Rourke's vacations in hell.

  • Image of ineffable.me ineffable.me at 03:52 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @Moe: Yeah, their non-music articles are aces. Except for Rob, god I love that man, but yeah. I agree.

    @rachystyle: well, she shouldnt have gone and gottena boob job in the first place.

  • Image of ineffable.me ineffable.me at 03:52 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @AthertonMerriweather: i oew you a soda.

  • I blame her moms, yo. VH1 made a very compelling argument, although I was firmly on the 'Hate Mama Spears' train well before that.

  • @layladylan: I remember thinking the video was so cute when it came out. I must have been 11 or 12 at the time. The song didn't strike me as sexual, nor did the video, really. It just looked like a lot of fun and I wanted to be Britney dancing in the hallway in her schoolgirl uniform. Now that I'm older I totally realize how that image must have titillated millions of older men, despite being outwardly marketed to kids my age.

  • that LAT letter nomani wrote didn't fly with me. though, i'd be interested to see what her article says.

  • @jenndavo: I was mostly doubting the history of her childhood. When every second of her life wasn't documented by photographers but by hearsay and speculation.
    Now, I'm pretty sure the girl has been driven batshit crazy. (but then if flash bulbs were going off in my face every time I stepped out of the house, I may be batshit crazy as well...)


  • Image of SinisterRouge SinisterRouge at 03:57 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @kitschenette: Yup. That's the very one I am talking about. And I remember a friend of mine telling me how hot she was. And I was disturbed. I knew this girl was gonna be a hot mess one day.

  • @NicoleItchy: good point. it's the little things, innit?

  • Image of SarahMC SarahMC at 03:59 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @ThaKadinskyPapers: Her mom isn't her only parent, though. Apparently her dad was either drunk or MIA for most of her childhood.

  • @Moe: Their crap jobs hide the real, good stuff written by real, good writers.
    There were a few articles I had to save but otherwise... crap.


  • Image of BeAgrestic BeAgrestic at 04:05 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @AthertonMerriweather: Agreed.We get RS at my parents house and that's the only thing I ever read. It's very well done!

    @SinisterRouge: I remember that. It was a sign of things to come. At the time though, I thought it was hot.

  • Image of BeAgrestic BeAgrestic at 04:05 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @BeAgrestic: *the war stories

  • Image of jenndavo jenndavo at 04:06 PM on 02/19/08 *

    @Sukie in the Graveyard: Yeah, that's true, too. I especially hate the fact that they're taking the word of her first (and still fairly immature) boyfriend to determine when and where she lost her virginity. 'Cause, you know, boys never lie about sex or anything.

  • @esmemurphy: Some accounts say it was Britney's idea. I think Chuck Klosterman covered a few years ago when he interviewed her for Esquire. The one where she was pantsless on the cover.

  • Image of JennaW JennaW at 04:09 PM on 02/19/08 *

    I read this and thought it was full of shit. Mr. Pop Psyche needs to shut up.

    Britney doesn't care what people think but wants to show us what we've done to her? Sorry, hon. Guilt-free, here. I"m very sorry you lost out in the decent family roulette game, but it's not my fault that after reaching adulthood, you made a string of horrible life choices and then utterly failed to cope with the consequences.

    And there is no way she's in control of her out-of-controlness. This is such complete shit.

  • i used to be the kind of girl who hung out with guys almost exclusively, but lately i'm starting to think that true platonic friendship between men and women is practically impossible. i've lost more than one male friend because of unresolved sexual tension - like, he was secretly really into me and i didn't feel the same way, and he couldn't deal with it. to me it seems like many - not all, but many - male-female friendships there are ulterior motives in one or both parties. female friendships may be more difficult, but at least they're genuine.